Suppr超能文献

阿法替尼对比厄洛替尼作为晚期肺鳞状细胞癌患者二线治疗的疗效:3期随机LUX-Lung 8试验的最终分析

Afatinib versus erlotinib as second-line treatment of patients with advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the lung: Final analysis of the randomised phase 3 LUX-Lung 8 trial.

作者信息

Goss Glenwood D, Cobo Manuel, Lu Shun, Syrigos Konstantinos, Lee Ki Hyeong, Göker Erdem, Georgoulias Vassilis, Isla Dolores, Morabito Alessandro, Min Young J, Ardizzoni Andrea, Bender Shaun, Cseh Agnieszka, Felip Enriqueta

机构信息

The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada.

Unidad de Gestión Clínica Intercentros de Oncología Médica, Hospitales Universitarios Regional y Virgen de la Victoria, IBIMA, Málaga, Spain.

出版信息

EClinicalMedicine. 2021 Jun 18;37:100940. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.100940. eCollection 2021 Jul.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

LUX-Lung 8 was a randomised, controlled, phase 3 study comparing afatinib and erlotinib as second-line treatment of patients with advanced squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the lung. We report the final overall survival (OS) and safety analyses of LUX-Lung 8 and investigate the characteristics of patients who achieved long-term benefit (≥12 months' treatment).

METHODS

LUX-Lung 8 (NCT01523587) enroled patients between March 2012 and January 2014 in 183 cancer centres located in 23 countries worldwide and this final analysis had a data cut-off of March 2018. Eligible patients had stage IIIB or IV lung SCC and had progressed after at least four cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive afatinib (40 mg per day) or erlotinib (150 mg per day) until disease progression. Endpoints included OS and safety; a post-hoc analysis of patients with long-term benefit (≥12 months on treatment) was also conducted.

FINDINGS

795 eligible patients were randomly assigned (398 to afatinib, 397 to erlotinib). OS was significantly prolonged with afatinib compared with erlotinib (median 7·8 months vs 6·8 months; hazard ratio 0·84; 95% CI 0·73-0·97;  = 0·0193). These findings were consistent with those of the primary analysis and were consistent across subgroups. Adverse events (AEs) were manageable with dose interruption and reduction, with similar AEs being experienced between both groups. Twenty-one (5·3%) patients receiving afatinib and 13 (3·3%) patients receiving erlotinib achieved long-term benefit; median OS was 34·6 months and 20·1 months, respectively. Amongst 132 afatinib-treated patients who underwent tumour genetic analysis, family mutations were more common in patients with long-term benefit than in the overall population (50% vs 21%).

INTERPRETATION

Afatinib is a treatment option for patients with SCC of the lung progressing on chemotherapy who are ineligible for immunotherapy, particularly those with family genetic aberrations. Afatinib has a predictable and manageable tolerability profile, and long-term treatment may be well tolerated.

摘要

背景

LUX-Lung 8是一项随机、对照、3期研究,比较阿法替尼和厄洛替尼作为晚期肺鳞状细胞癌(SCC)患者的二线治疗。我们报告LUX-Lung 8的最终总生存期(OS)和安全性分析,并调查获得长期获益(治疗≥12个月)患者的特征。

方法

LUX-Lung 8(NCT01523587)于2012年3月至2014年1月在全球23个国家的183个癌症中心招募患者,本次最终分析的数据截止日期为2018年3月。符合条件的患者为IIIB期或IV期肺SCC,且在至少四个周期的铂类化疗后病情进展。患者被随机分配(1:1)接受阿法替尼(每日40mg)或厄洛替尼(每日150mg),直至疾病进展。终点包括OS和安全性;还对获得长期获益(治疗≥12个月)的患者进行了事后分析。

结果

795例符合条件的患者被随机分配(398例接受阿法替尼,397例接受厄洛替尼)。与厄洛替尼相比,阿法替尼显著延长了OS(中位生存期7.8个月对6.8个月;风险比0.84;95%CI 0.73-0.97;P=0.0193)。这些结果与初步分析一致,且在各亚组中均一致。不良事件(AE)可通过剂量中断和减少进行管理,两组经历的AE相似。21例(5.3%)接受阿法替尼治疗的患者和13例(3.3%)接受厄洛替尼治疗的患者获得了长期获益;中位OS分别为34.6个月和20.1个月。在132例接受阿法替尼治疗并进行肿瘤基因分析的患者中,获得长期获益的患者中 家族突变比总体人群更常见(50%对21%)。

解读

对于化疗后病情进展且不符合免疫治疗条件的肺SCC患者,阿法替尼是一种治疗选择,尤其是那些有 家族基因畸变的患者。阿法替尼具有可预测且可管理的耐受性,长期治疗可能耐受性良好。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac5c/8225678/39a20a5dc79d/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验