Cheng Wen-Chien, Lin Chi-Chien, Liao Wei-Chih, Lin Yu-Chao, Chen Chia-Hung, Chen Hung-Jen, Tu Chih-Yen, Hsia Te-Chun
Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Department of Internal Medicine, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
School of Medicine, College of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.
BMC Cancer. 2024 Feb 19;24(1):228. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-11956-w.
The irreversible epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR TKIs) afatinib and dacomitinib are approved for first-line treatment of EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of afatinib and dacomitinib in this setting.
Between September 2020 and March 2023, we retrospectively recruited patients diagnosed with advanced-stage EGFR-mutant NSCLC who were treated with first-line irreversible EGFR-TKIs. The enrolled patients were assigned to two groups based on whether they received afatinib or dacomitinib.
A total of 101 patients were enrolled in the study (70 to afatinib and 31 to dacomitinib). The partial response rates (PR) for first-line treatment with afatinib and dacomitinib were 85.7 and 80.6% (p = 0.522). The median progression-free survival (PFS) (18.9 vs. 16.3 months, p = 0.975) and time to treatment failure (TTF) (22.7 vs. 15.9 months, p = 0.324) in patients with afatinib and dacomitinib treatment were similar. There was no significant difference observed in the median PFS (16.1 vs. 18.9 months, p = 0.361) and TTF (32.5 vs. 19.6 months, p = 0.182) between patients receiving the standard dose and those receiving the reduced dose. In terms of side effects, the incidence of diarrhea was higher in the afatinib group (75.8% vs. 35.5%, p < 0.001), while the incidence of paronychia was higher in the dacomitinib group (58.1% vs. 31.4%, p = 0.004). The PFS (17.6 vs. 24.9 months, p = 0.663) and TTF (21.3 vs. 25.1 months, p = 0.152) were similar between patients younger than 75 years and those older than 75 years.
This study showed that afatinib and dacomitinib had similar effectiveness and safety profiles. However, they have slightly different side effects. Afatinib and dacomitinib can be safely administered to patients across different age groups with appropriate dose reductions.
不可逆表皮生长因子受体酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(EGFR-TKIs)阿法替尼和达可替尼已被批准用于一线治疗EGFR突变阳性的非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)。我们旨在比较阿法替尼和达可替尼在此情况下的疗效和安全性。
在2020年9月至2023年3月期间,我们回顾性招募了被诊断为晚期EGFR突变NSCLC并接受一线不可逆EGFR-TKIs治疗的患者。根据患者接受的是阿法替尼还是达可替尼,将入选患者分为两组。
共有101例患者纳入本研究(70例接受阿法替尼治疗,31例接受达可替尼治疗)。阿法替尼和达可替尼一线治疗的部分缓解率(PR)分别为85.7%和80.6%(p = 0.522)。接受阿法替尼和达可替尼治疗的患者的中位无进展生存期(PFS)(18.9个月对16.3个月,p = 0.975)和治疗失败时间(TTF)(22.7个月对15.9个月,p = 0.324)相似。接受标准剂量和减量剂量的患者之间,中位PFS(16.1个月对18.9个月,p = 0.361)和TTF(32.5个月对19.6个月,p = 0.182)无显著差异。在副作用方面,阿法替尼组腹泻发生率较高(75.8%对35.5%,p < 0.001),而达可替尼组甲沟炎发生率较高(58.1%对31.4%,p = 0.004)。75岁以下和75岁以上患者的PFS(17.6个月对24.9个月,p = 0.663)和TTF(21.3个月对25.1个月,p = 0.152)相似。
本研究表明,阿法替尼和达可替尼具有相似的有效性和安全性。然而,它们的副作用略有不同。阿法替尼和达可替尼可以在适当减量的情况下安全地用于不同年龄组的患者。