Suppr超能文献

纳美芬治疗酒精依赖的安全性和持久性。两项上市后安全性研究的结果。

Safety and Persistence of Nalmefene Treatment for Alcohol Dependence. Results from Two Post-authorisation Safety Studies.

机构信息

Castle Craig Hospital, Peeblesshire, UK.

Frank Andersohn Consulting and Research Services, Mandelstr. 16, 10409 Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Alcohol Alcohol. 2021 Aug 30;56(5):556-564. doi: 10.1093/alcalc/agab045.

Abstract

AIMS

Two post-authorisation studies assessed the safety and persistence of patients' use of nalmefene.

METHODS

The START study (EUPAS5678) was a non-interventional, multi-country, prospective, 18-month (8 follow-up visits) cohort study including outpatients initiating nalmefene for the first time. The multi-database retrospective cohort study (MDRC, EUPAS14083) included baseline and follow-up data from German, Swedish and UK healthcare databases. Both studies permitted 'all comers' without explicit exclusion criteria; predefined subgroups of interest included the elderly (≥65 years) as well as patients with significant psychiatric and/or somatic comorbidities.

RESULTS

START study: Overall, the mean duration of nalmefene treatment was 10.3 ± 7.3 months (N = 1348), with 49.0% of patients treated for ≥1 year; frequent reasons for treatment discontinuation were 'goal reached' and 'drug cost'. The most frequently reported adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were nausea (4.7%), dizziness (3.2%) and insomnia (2.0%). ADR rates appeared higher in the elderly subpopulation (18.6% reported ≥1 ADR vs. 12.0% in the total population) but were not higher in the other predefined subgroups.MDRC study: The database follow-up analysis followed 2892 patients over 18 months for whom the duration of nalmefene treatment was between 2 and 3 months and <5% of patients used nalmefene for ≥1 year.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the inclusion of a wider patient population (e.g. elderly patients and those with relevant co-morbidities), the safety and tolerability profile of nalmefene given in routine practice was consistent with previous clinical studies. The differing rates of persistence beyond 1 year likely reflect the different methodologies and highlight the relevance of psychosocial support at follow-up visits.

摘要

目的

两项上市后研究评估了纳美芬患者使用的安全性和持续性。

方法

START 研究(EUPAS5678)是一项非干预性、多国家、前瞻性、18 个月(8 次随访)的队列研究,包括首次开始使用纳美芬的门诊患者。多数据库回顾性队列研究(MDRC,EUPAS14083)包括德国、瑞典和英国医疗保健数据库的基线和随访数据。这两项研究都允许“所有患者”,没有明确的排除标准;感兴趣的预设亚组包括老年人(≥65 岁)以及有明显精神和/或躯体合并症的患者。

结果

START 研究:总体而言,纳美芬治疗的平均持续时间为 10.3±7.3 个月(N=1348),49.0%的患者治疗时间≥1 年;治疗中断的常见原因是“达到目标”和“药物费用”。报告的最常见药物不良反应(ADR)是恶心(4.7%)、头晕(3.2%)和失眠(2.0%)。在老年亚组中,ADR 发生率较高(18.6%报告≥1 种 ADR,而总人群中为 12.0%),但在其他预设亚组中并不更高。MDRC 研究:数据库随访分析对 2892 名患者进行了 18 个月的随访,这些患者接受纳美芬治疗的时间在 2 至 3 个月之间,且<5%的患者使用纳美芬治疗时间≥1 年。

结论

尽管纳入了更广泛的患者人群(例如老年患者和有相关合并症的患者),但在常规实践中使用纳美芬的安全性和耐受性与先前的临床研究一致。1 年以上的持续性差异可能反映了不同的方法学,并强调了随访时心理社会支持的重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b310/8406067/db6addeb1776/agab045f1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验