Suppr超能文献

局部晚期直肠癌新辅助治疗的应用:帕博利珠单抗在 2 期随机临床试验中的初步结果。

Use of Total Neoadjuvant Therapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: Initial Results From the Pembrolizumab Arm of a Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial.

机构信息

NRG Oncology, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Alliance, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

JAMA Oncol. 2021 Aug 1;7(8):1225-1230. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.1683.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) is often used to downstage locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) and decrease locoregional relapse; however, more than one-third of patients develop recurrent metastatic disease. As such, novel combinations are needed.

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether the addition of pembrolizumab during and after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy can lead to an improvement in the neoadjuvant rectal (NAR) score compared with treatment with FOLFOX (5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin) and chemoradiotherapy alone.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In this open-label, phase 2, randomized clinical trial (NRG-GI002), patients in academic and private practice settings were enrolled. Patients with stage II/III LARC with distal location (cT3-4 ≤ 5 cm from anal verge, any N), with bulky disease (any cT4 or tumor within 3 mm of mesorectal fascia), at high risk for metastatic disease (cN2), and/or who were not candidates for sphincter-sparing surgery (SSS) were stratified based on clinical tumor and nodal stages. Trial accrual opened on August 1, 2018, and ended on May 31, 2019. This intent-to-treat analysis is based on data as of August 2020.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomized (1:1) to neoadjuvant FOLFOX for 4 months and then underwent chemoradiotherapy (capecitabine with 50.4 Gy) with or without intravenous pembrolizumab administered at a dosage of 200 mg every 3 weeks for up to 6 doses before surgery.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary end point was the NAR score. Secondary end points included pathologic complete response (pCR) rate, SSS, disease-free survival, and overall survival. This report focuses on end points available after definitive surgery (NAR score, pCR, SSS, clinical complete response rate, margin involvement, and safety).

RESULTS

A total of 185 patients (126 [68.1%] male; mean [SD] age, 55.7 [11.1] years) were randomized to the control arm (CA) (n = 95) or the pembrolizumab arm (PA) (n = 90). Of these patients, 137 were evaluable for NAR score (68 CA patients and 69 PA patients). The mean (SD) NAR score was 11.53 (12.43) for the PA patients (95% CI, 8.54-14.51) vs 14.08 (13.82) for the CA patients (95% CI, 10.74-17.43) (P = .26). The pCR rate was 31.9% in the PA vs 29.4% in the CA (P = .75). The clinical complete response rate was 13.9% in the PA vs 13.6% in the CA (P = .95). The percentage of patients who underwent SSS was 59.4% in the PA vs 71.0% in the CA (P = .15). Grade 3 to 4 adverse events were slightly increased in the PA (48.2%) vs the CA (37.3%) during chemoradiotherapy. Two deaths occurred during FOLFOX: sepsis (CA) and pneumonia (PA). No differences in radiotherapy fractions, FOLFOX, or capecitabine doses were found.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Pembrolizumab added to chemoradiotherapy as part of total neoadjuvant therapy was suggested to be safe; however, the NAR score difference does not support further study.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02921256.

摘要

重要性:局部晚期直肠癌(LARC)患者通常采用新辅助放化疗(TNT)降期治疗,降低局部复发率;但仍有三分之一以上的患者出现复发性转移性疾病。因此,需要新的联合治疗方案。

目的:评估在新辅助放化疗期间和之后加入派姆单抗是否能提高新辅助直肠(NAR)评分,与单纯接受 FOLFOX(氟尿嘧啶、亚叶酸钙和奥沙利铂)和放化疗的患者相比。

设计、地点和参与者:在这项开放标签、2 期随机临床试验(NRG-GI002)中,在学术和私人实践环境中招募患者。招募的患者为 II/III 期 LARC 且肿瘤下缘距离肛门边缘较远(cT3-4≤5cm)、肿瘤较大(任何 cT4 或肿瘤位于直肠系膜筋膜 3mm 以内)、存在远处转移高风险(cN2)或不适合保留肛门手术(SSS)的患者,根据临床肿瘤和淋巴结分期分层。试验招募于 2018 年 8 月 1 日开始,于 2019 年 5 月 31 日结束。本意向治疗分析基于截至 2020 年 8 月的数据。

干预措施:患者随机(1:1)接受新辅助 FOLFOX 治疗 4 个月,然后接受卡培他滨联合 50.4Gy 放化疗,并在手术前静脉注射派姆单抗,剂量为 200mg,每 3 周 1 次,最多 6 次。

主要终点和次要终点:主要终点为 NAR 评分。次要终点包括病理完全缓解率(pCR)、SSS、无病生存率和总生存率。本报告重点关注明确手术后的终点(NAR 评分、pCR、SSS、临床完全缓解率、切缘受累情况和安全性)。

结果:共 185 名患者(126 名男性,占 68.1%;平均[SD]年龄为 55.7[11.1]岁)被随机分配至对照组(CA,n=95)或派姆单抗组(PA,n=90)。其中,137 名患者可评估 NAR 评分(68 名 CA 患者和 69 名 PA 患者)。PA 组的平均(SD)NAR 评分为 11.53(12.43)(95%CI,8.54-14.51),CA 组为 14.08(13.82)(95%CI,10.74-17.43)(P=0.26)。PA 组的 pCR 率为 31.9%,CA 组为 29.4%(P=0.75)。PA 组的临床完全缓解率为 13.9%,CA 组为 13.6%(P=0.95)。PA 组行 SSS 的患者比例为 59.4%,CA 组为 71.0%(P=0.15)。在放化疗期间,PA 组(48.2%)比 CA 组(37.3%)的 3 级到 4 级不良事件略有增加。在 FOLFOX 期间发生 2 例死亡:败血症(CA)和肺炎(PA)。未发现放疗次数、FOLFOX 或卡培他滨剂量的差异。

结论和相关性:派姆单抗联合放化疗作为新辅助放化疗的一部分,提示是安全的;然而,NAR 评分的差异不支持进一步研究。

试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT02921256。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验