Brubaker B H
Department of Nursing, Eastern Mennonite College, Harrisonburg, VA.
Nurs Res. 1988 Sep-Oct;37(5):282-7.
Weiner's (1985b) attribution theory was tested by determining attributions for current weight and classification of attributions on the dimensions of locus, stability, controllability, intentionality, and universality. Relationships between these causal dimensions and expectancy for future success in weight control were tested using 260 faculty and staff in two collegiate settings. Subjects were placed in outcome (success or failure) groups, depending on whether they reported weighing what they desired (success) or more than they desired (failure). Personal habits related to food and activity were perceived as the major causes of weight outcomes, although success subjects frequently chose inherited or physiological factors. Weiner's stability-expectancy proposition was supported by increased expectancy after success when stability was rated higher, and after failure when stability was rated lower, R2 = .40.
通过确定对当前体重的归因以及在控制点、稳定性、可控性、意向性和普遍性维度上的归因分类,对韦纳(1985b)的归因理论进行了测试。在两个大学环境中,对260名教职员工进行了测试,以检验这些因果维度与未来体重控制成功期望之间的关系。根据受试者报告的体重是否符合他们的期望(成功)或超过他们的期望(失败),将他们分为结果(成功或失败)组。与饮食和活动相关的个人习惯被视为体重结果的主要原因,尽管成功组的受试者经常选择遗传或生理因素。当稳定性被评为较高时,成功后期望增加;当稳定性被评为较低时,失败后期望增加,R2 = 0.40,这支持了韦纳的稳定性-期望命题。