• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

产潜在AmpCβ-内酰胺酶肠杆菌科细菌引起的血流感染的早期治疗结果:以哌拉西林/他唑巴坦为重点的回顾性队列研究

Early Treatment Outcomes for Bloodstream Infections Caused by Potential AmpC Beta-Lactamase-Producing Enterobacterales with Focus on Piperacillin/Tazobactam: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

作者信息

Herrmann Lena, Kimmig Aurelia, Rödel Jürgen, Hagel Stefan, Rose Norman, Pletz Mathias W, Bahrs Christina

机构信息

Institute of Infectious Diseases and Infection Control, Jena University Hospital, Am Klinikum 1, 07747 Jena, Germany.

Institute of Medical Microbiology, Jena University Hospital, 07747 Jena, Germany.

出版信息

Antibiotics (Basel). 2021 Jun 2;10(6):665. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10060665.

DOI:10.3390/antibiotics10060665
PMID:34199546
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8229083/
Abstract

The Gram-negative bacilli spp., spp., , complex, spp. and are common Enterobacterales that may harbor inducible chromosomal AmpC beta-lactamase genes. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate treatment outcomes and identify predictors of early treatment response in patients with bloodstream infection caused by potential AmpC beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales (SPICE-BSI). This cohort study included adult patients with SPICE-BSI hospitalized between 01/2011 and 02/2019. The primary outcome was early treatment response 72 h after the start of active treatment, defined as survival, hemodynamic stability, improved or stable SOFA score, resolution of fever and leukocytosis and microbiologic resolution. Among 295 included patients, the most common focus was the lower respiratory tract (27.8%), and spp. ( = 155) was the main pathogen. The early treatment response rate was significantly lower ( = 0.006) in the piperacillin/tazobactam group (17/81 patients, 21.0%) than in the carbapenem group (40/82 patients, 48.8%). Independent negative predictors of early treatment response ( < 0.02) included initial SOFA score, liver comorbidity and empiric piperacillin/tazobactam treatment. In vitro piperacillin/tazobactam resistance was detected in three patients with relapsed -BSI and initial treatment with piperacillin/tazobactam. In conclusion, our findings show that piperacillin/tazobactam might be associated with early treatment failure in patients with SPICE-BSI.

摘要

革兰氏阴性杆菌属、属、属、属复合菌、属和属是常见的肠杆菌科细菌,可能携带可诱导的染色体AmpCβ-内酰胺酶基因。本研究的目的是评估潜在产AmpCβ-内酰胺酶肠杆菌科细菌(SPICE-BSI)所致血流感染患者的治疗结局,并确定早期治疗反应的预测因素。这项队列研究纳入了2011年1月至2019年2月期间住院的成年SPICE-BSI患者。主要结局是开始积极治疗72小时后的早期治疗反应,定义为存活、血流动力学稳定、序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分改善或稳定、发热和白细胞增多症消退以及微生物学清除。在纳入的295例患者中,最常见的感染部位是下呼吸道(27.8%),属(n = 155)是主要病原体。哌拉西林/他唑巴坦组(17/81例患者,21.0%)的早期治疗反应率显著低于碳青霉烯组(40/82例患者,48.8%)(P = 0.006)。早期治疗反应的独立阴性预测因素(P < 0.02)包括初始SOFA评分、肝脏合并症和经验性使用哌拉西林/他唑巴坦治疗。在3例复发性SPICE-BSI且初始使用哌拉西林/他唑巴坦治疗的患者中检测到体外哌拉西林/他唑巴坦耐药。总之,我们的研究结果表明,哌拉西林/他唑巴坦可能与SPICE-BSI患者的早期治疗失败有关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7521/8229083/bfdf12492b5c/antibiotics-10-00665-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7521/8229083/bfdf12492b5c/antibiotics-10-00665-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7521/8229083/bfdf12492b5c/antibiotics-10-00665-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Early Treatment Outcomes for Bloodstream Infections Caused by Potential AmpC Beta-Lactamase-Producing Enterobacterales with Focus on Piperacillin/Tazobactam: A Retrospective Cohort Study.产潜在AmpCβ-内酰胺酶肠杆菌科细菌引起的血流感染的早期治疗结果:以哌拉西林/他唑巴坦为重点的回顾性队列研究
Antibiotics (Basel). 2021 Jun 2;10(6):665. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10060665.
2
Meropenem Versus Piperacillin-Tazobactam for Definitive Treatment of Bloodstream Infections Caused by AmpC β-Lactamase-Producing spp, , , spp, or : A Pilot Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial (MERINO-2).美罗培南与哌拉西林-他唑巴坦用于产AmpCβ-内酰胺酶的[具体菌名]、[具体菌名]或[具体菌名]所致血流感染的确定性治疗:一项多中心随机对照试验(MERINO-2)
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2021 Aug 2;8(8):ofab387. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofab387. eCollection 2021 Aug.
3
Ceftolozane-tazobactam versus meropenem for definitive treatment of bloodstream infection due to extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) and AmpC-producing Enterobacterales ("MERINO-3"): study protocol for a multicentre, open-label randomised non-inferiority trial.头孢洛扎他唑巴坦与美罗培南治疗产超广谱β-内酰胺酶(ESBL)和 AmpC 酶肠杆菌科细菌血流感染的比较(MERINO-3):一项多中心、开放标签、随机非劣效性临床试验方案。
Trials. 2021 Apr 22;22(1):301. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05206-8.
4
Effectiveness of third-generation cephalosporins or piperacillin compared with cefepime or carbapenems for severe infections caused by wild-type AmpC β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales: A multi-centre retrospective propensity-weighted study.三代头孢菌素或哌拉西林与头孢吡肟或碳青霉烯类药物治疗产野生型 AmpC 酶肠杆菌科所致重症感染的疗效比较:一项多中心回顾性倾向评分匹配研究。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2023 Jul;62(1):106809. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2023.106809. Epub 2023 Apr 6.
5
Risk Factors of Death in Bloodstream Infections Caused by AmpC β-Lactamase-Producing in Patients with Neoplasia.肿瘤患者中产 AmpC β-内酰胺酶血流感染的死亡危险因素。
Infect Drug Resist. 2021 Aug 11;14:3083-3097. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S312920. eCollection 2021.
6
Piperacillin/tazobactam versus cefepime or carbapenems for cefoxitin-non-susceptible Enterobacter cloacae, Klebsiella aerogenes, Citrobacter freundii, Serratia marcescens and Morganella morganii bacteraemia in immunocompromised patients.哌拉西林/他唑巴坦与头孢吡肟或碳青霉烯类药物治疗免疫功能低下患者中产头孢西丁耐药的阴沟肠杆菌、产气肠杆菌、弗氏柠檬酸杆菌、黏质沙雷菌和摩氏摩根菌菌血症的比较。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2023 Apr 3;78(4):1009-1014. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkad037.
7
Outcomes of treating AmpC-producing Enterobacterales bacteraemia with carbapenems vs. non-carbapenems.碳青霉烯类与非碳青霉烯类治疗产 AmpC 肠杆菌科血流感染的结局比较。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2020 Feb;55(2):105860. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2019.105860. Epub 2019 Dec 11.
8
Antibiotic Treatment of Infections Caused by AmpC-Producing Enterobacterales.产AmpC肠杆菌科细菌所致感染的抗生素治疗
Pharmacy (Basel). 2024 Sep 21;12(5):142. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy12050142.
9
Mortality and Risk Factors of Death in Patients with AmpC -Lactamase Producing Bloodstream Infection: A .产AmpC内酰胺酶血流感染患者的死亡率及死亡风险因素:A.
Infect Drug Resist. 2024 Sep 18;17:4023-4035. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S473789. eCollection 2024.
10
Piperacillin-Tazobactam versus Other Antibacterial Agents for Treatment of Bloodstream Infections Due to AmpC β-Lactamase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae.哌拉西林-他唑巴坦与其他抗菌药物治疗产AmpCβ-内酰胺酶肠杆菌科细菌所致血流感染的比较
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017 May 24;61(6). doi: 10.1128/AAC.00276-17. Print 2017 Jun.

引用本文的文献

1
Cefepime versus carbapenem for treating complicated urinary tract infection caused by cefoxitin-nonsusceptible ESCPM organisms: a multicenter, real-world study.头孢吡肟与碳青霉烯类药物治疗由头孢西丁不敏感的肠杆菌科细菌、葡萄球菌和假单胞菌(ESCPM)引起的复杂性尿路感染:一项多中心、真实世界研究
BMC Infect Dis. 2025 Mar 31;25(1):439. doi: 10.1186/s12879-025-10850-5.
2
Advancements in Managing Choledocholithiasis and Acute Cholangitis in the Elderly: A Comprehensive Review.老年患者胆总管结石及急性胆管炎管理的进展:一项综述
Cureus. 2025 Feb 4;17(2):e78492. doi: 10.7759/cureus.78492. eCollection 2025 Feb.
3
Piperacillin/tazobactam vs. cefepime or carbapenems for the treatment of bloodstream infections due to bacteria producing chromosomal AmpC beta-lactamase: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Chronic liver disease negatively affects outcome in hospitalised patients with community-acquired pneumonia.慢性肝病会对社区获得性肺炎住院患者的预后产生负面影响。
Gut. 2021 Jan;70(1):221-222. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-320876. Epub 2020 Apr 6.
2
Does This Patient Need Blood Cultures? A Scoping Review of Indications for Blood Cultures in Adult Nonneutropenic Inpatients.是否需要给这位患者做血培养?成人非中性粒细胞减少住院患者血培养适应证的范围评价。
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Aug 22;71(5):1339-1347. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa039.
3
Outcomes of treating AmpC-producing Enterobacterales bacteraemia with carbapenems vs. non-carbapenems.
哌拉西林/他唑巴坦与头孢吡肟或碳青霉烯类药物治疗产染色体AmpCβ-内酰胺酶细菌所致血流感染的系统评价和荟萃分析
Infection. 2024 Dec 4. doi: 10.1007/s15010-024-02447-y.
4
Mortality and Risk Factors of Death in Patients with AmpC -Lactamase Producing Bloodstream Infection: A .产AmpC内酰胺酶血流感染患者的死亡率及死亡风险因素:A.
Infect Drug Resist. 2024 Sep 18;17:4023-4035. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S473789. eCollection 2024.
5
Clinical Outcomes of Patients with AmpC-Beta-Lactamase-Producing Enterobacterales Bacteremia Treated with Carbapenems versus Non-Carbapenem Regimens: A Single-Center Study.碳青霉烯类与非碳青霉烯类方案治疗产AmpCβ-内酰胺酶肠杆菌科细菌血症患者的临床结局:一项单中心研究
Antibiotics (Basel). 2024 Jul 29;13(8):709. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics13080709.
6
Piperacillin/Tazobactam Susceptibility Test Interpretive Criteria for Enterobacterales: Recommendations From the United States Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing.肠杆菌科细菌哌拉西林/他唑巴坦敏感性试验的解释标准:美国抗菌药物敏感性试验委员会的建议
Clin Infect Dis. 2024 Dec 17;79(6):1354-1362. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciae328.
7
Early treatment response to piperacillin/tazobactam in patients with bloodstream infections caused by non-ESBL ampicillin/sulbactam-resistant Escherichia coli: a binational cohort study.哌拉西林/他唑巴坦治疗非产 ESBL 氨苄西林/舒巴坦耐药大肠埃希菌血流感染患者的早期治疗反应:一项跨国队列研究。
Infection. 2023 Dec;51(6):1749-1758. doi: 10.1007/s15010-023-02074-z. Epub 2023 Jul 18.
8
Is Piperacillin-Tazobactam an Appropriate Empirical Agent for Hospital-Acquired Sepsis and Community-Acquired Septic Shock of Unknown Origin in Australia?哌拉西林-他唑巴坦对于澳大利亚不明原因的医院获得性脓毒症和社区获得性感染性休克来说是一种合适的经验性用药吗?
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 May 5;10(5):851. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10050851.
9
Performance of the eazyplex® BloodScreen GN as a simple and rapid molecular test for identification of Gram-negative bacteria from positive blood cultures.eazyplex® BloodScreen GN 作为一种简单快速的分子检测方法,用于从阳性血培养物中鉴定革兰氏阴性菌的性能。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2022 Mar;41(3):489-494. doi: 10.1007/s10096-021-04383-3. Epub 2021 Nov 22.
碳青霉烯类与非碳青霉烯类治疗产 AmpC 肠杆菌科血流感染的结局比较。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2020 Feb;55(2):105860. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2019.105860. Epub 2019 Dec 11.
4
Beta-Lactam/Beta-Lactamase Inhibitor Therapy for Potential AmpC-Producing Organisms: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.针对潜在产AmpC酶菌株的β-内酰胺类/β-内酰胺酶抑制剂治疗:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2019 Jul 1;6(7). doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofz248.
5
AmpC β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales: what a clinician should know.产 AmpCβ-内酰胺酶肠杆菌科细菌:临床医生须知。
Infection. 2019 Jun;47(3):363-375. doi: 10.1007/s15010-019-01291-9. Epub 2019 Mar 6.
6
A Primer on AmpC β-Lactamases: Necessary Knowledge for an Increasingly Multidrug-resistant World.AmpC β-内酰胺酶入门:应对日益增多的多重耐药问题的必备知识
Clin Infect Dis. 2019 Sep 27;69(8):1446-1455. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz173.
7
Effect of Piperacillin-Tazobactam vs Meropenem on 30-Day Mortality for Patients With E coli or Klebsiella pneumoniae Bloodstream Infection and Ceftriaxone Resistance: A Randomized Clinical Trial.哌拉西林-他唑巴坦与美罗培南对产 ESBLs 的大肠埃希菌或肺炎克雷伯菌血流感染且对头孢曲松耐药患者 30 天死亡率的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2018 Sep 11;320(10):984-994. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.12163.
8
Impact of carbapenem versus non-carbapenem treatment on the rates of superinfection: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.碳青霉烯类与非碳青霉烯类治疗对二重感染发生率的影响:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
J Infect Chemother. 2018 Nov;24(11):915-920. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2018.08.004. Epub 2018 Sep 6.
9
Colistin alone versus colistin plus meropenem for treatment of severe infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria: an open-label, randomised controlled trial.多黏菌素单用与多黏菌素联合美罗培南治疗碳青霉烯类耐药革兰氏阴性菌引起的严重感染:一项开放标签、随机对照试验。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2018 Apr;18(4):391-400. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30099-9. Epub 2018 Feb 16.
10
Incidence of risk factors for bloodstream infections in patients with major burns receiving intensive care: A retrospective single-center cohort study.接受重症监护的重度烧伤患者血流感染危险因素的发生率:一项回顾性单中心队列研究。
Burns. 2018 Jun;44(4):784-792. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2017.12.009. Epub 2018 Feb 1.