Abdallat Mahmoud, Saryyeva Assel, Blahak Christian, Wolf Marc E, Weigel Ralf, Loher Thomas J, Runge Joachim, Heissler Hans E, Kinfe Thomas M, Krauss Joachim K
Department of Neurosurgery, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany.
Department of Neurosurgery, University of Jordan, Amman 11183, Jordan.
Biomedicines. 2021 Jun 25;9(7):731. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines9070731.
The treatment of neuropathic and central pain still remains a major challenge. Thalamic deep brain stimulation (DBS) involving various target structures is a therapeutic option which has received increased re-interest. Beneficial results have been reported in several more recent smaller studies, however, there is a lack of prospective studies on larger series providing long term outcomes. Forty patients with refractory neuropathic and central pain syndromes underwent stereotactic bifocal implantation of DBS electrodes in the centromedian-parafascicular (CM-Pf) and the ventroposterolateral (VPL) or ventroposteromedial (VPM) nucleus contralateral to the side of pain. Electrodes were externalized for test stimulation for several days. Outcome was assessed with five specific VAS pain scores (maximum, minimum, average pain, pain at presentation, allodynia). The mean age at surgery was 53.5 years, and the mean duration of pain was 8.2 years. During test stimulation significant reductions of all five pain scores was achieved with either CM-Pf or VPL/VPM stimulation. Pacemakers were implanted in 33/40 patients for chronic stimulation for whom a mean follow-up of 62.8 months (range 3-180 months) was available. Of these, 18 patients had a follow-up beyond four years. Hardware related complications requiring secondary surgeries occurred in 11/33 patients. The VAS maximum pain score was improved by ≥50% in 8/18, and by ≥30% in 11/18 on long term follow-up beyond four years, and the VAS average pain score by ≥50% in 10/18, and by ≥30% in 16/18. On a group level, changes in pain scores remained statistically significant over time, however, there was no difference when comparing the efficacy of CM-Pf versus VPL/VPM stimulation. The best results were achieved in patients with facial pain, poststroke/central pain (except thalamic pain), or brachial plexus injury, while patients with thalamic lesions had the least benefit. Thalamic DBS is a useful treatment option in selected patients with severe and medically refractory pain.
神经性疼痛和中枢性疼痛的治疗仍然是一项重大挑战。涉及各种靶结构的丘脑深部脑刺激(DBS)是一种重新受到更多关注的治疗选择。最近几项规模较小的研究报告了有益的结果,然而,缺乏关于提供长期结果的更大样本量的前瞻性研究。40例难治性神经性和中枢性疼痛综合征患者在对侧疼痛部位的中央中核-束旁核(CM-Pf)以及腹后外侧核(VPL)或腹后内侧核(VPM)接受了DBS电极的立体定向双焦点植入。电极外置进行了数天的测试刺激。采用五个特定的视觉模拟评分(VAS)疼痛评分(最大值、最小值、平均疼痛、就诊时疼痛、痛觉过敏)评估结果。手术时的平均年龄为53.5岁,平均疼痛持续时间为8.2年。在测试刺激期间,CM-Pf或VPL/VPM刺激均使所有五个疼痛评分显著降低。33/40例患者植入了起搏器进行长期刺激,平均随访时间为62.8个月(范围3-180个月)。其中,18例患者随访超过四年。11/33例患者发生了需要二次手术的硬件相关并发症。在超过四年的长期随访中,18例患者中有8例VAS最大疼痛评分改善≥50%,11例改善≥30%;18例患者中有10例VAS平均疼痛评分改善≥50%,16例改善≥30%。在组水平上,疼痛评分的变化随时间仍具有统计学意义,然而,比较CM-Pf与VPL/VPM刺激的疗效时没有差异。面部疼痛、中风后/中枢性疼痛(除丘脑痛)或臂丛神经损伤患者取得了最佳效果,而丘脑病变患者获益最少。丘脑DBS是治疗部分患有严重且药物难治性疼痛患者的一种有效治疗选择。