Theocharidou Anna, Tzimas Konstantinos, Tolidis Kosmas, Tortopidis Dimitrios
Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece.
Postgraduate student, Department of Operative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece.
Acta Stomatol Croat. 2021 Sep;55(3):256-263. doi: 10.15644/asc55/3/3.
Hydrophilicity of dental impression materials is crucial for obtaining an accurate impression and necessary for the production of a well-fitting cast restoration. The most common technique for evaluation of hydrophilicity is a contact angle measurement. The aim of the present study was to compare the water contact angles of four groups of elastomeric impression materials, before and during setting.
Flattened specimens (n=10) of tested impression materials were prepared by the use of a Teflon mold with specific dimensions. A 5μl droplet of deionized water fell on the specimen, and photos were taken using a Nikon D3200 DSLR camera and a 105 mm macro lens (Nikorr, Nikon) in specific time points.
The CAD/CAM material showed the highest contact angle measurements. The light body polyvinylsiloxane (PVS) material 1, polyether and vinylsiloxanether material showed comparable contact angle measurements especially at the initial time point. A statistically significant reduction of contact angles was reported during setup time for all PVS, PE and vinylsiloxanether materials, while the most expressed reduction of contact angle measurements, and thus the most significant increase of hydrophilicity were reported for light wash PVS material 2.
The CAD/CAM impression material showed the most hydrophobic behavior. PVS materials showed excellent hydrophilicity. Polyether and polyvinyloxanether impression materials presented lower contact angle measurements, and thus superior hydrophilicity, compared with other tested materials initially and during setting. All tested impression materials presented a stepwise development of hydrophilicity during the setting stage.
牙科印模材料的亲水性对于获得准确的印模至关重要,也是制作贴合的铸造修复体所必需的。评估亲水性最常用的技术是接触角测量。本研究的目的是比较四组弹性印模材料在凝固前和凝固过程中的水接触角。
使用具有特定尺寸的聚四氟乙烯模具制备测试印模材料的扁平试样(n = 10)。将5μl去离子水滴落在试样上,并在特定时间点使用尼康D3200数码单反相机和105mm微距镜头(尼康尼克尔)拍摄照片。
CAD/CAM材料的接触角测量值最高。轻质聚硅氧烷(PVS)材料1、聚醚和乙烯基硅氧烷醚材料的接触角测量值相当,尤其是在初始时间点。所有PVS、PE和乙烯基硅氧烷醚材料在凝固过程中接触角均有统计学意义的降低,而轻质冲洗PVS材料2的接触角测量值降低最为明显,亲水性增加最为显著。
CAD/CAM印模材料表现出最强的疏水性能。PVS材料表现出优异的亲水性。与其他测试材料相比,聚醚和乙烯基氧烷醚印模材料在初始和凝固过程中的接触角测量值较低,因此亲水性更强。所有测试的印模材料在凝固阶段均呈现出亲水性的逐步发展。