• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Do Environmental Stringency Policies and Human Development Reduce CO Emissions? Evidence from G7 and BRICS Economies.环境政策严格程度和人类发展水平对 CO 排放有怎样的影响?来自 G7 和金砖国家经济体的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 22;18(13):6727. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18136727.
2
Do environmental taxes and environmental stringency policies reduce CO emissions? Evidence from 7 emerging economies.环境税和环境严格政策是否减少了 CO 排放?来自 7 个新兴经济体的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 May;28(18):22392-22408. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-11475-8. Epub 2021 Jan 8.
3
Asymmetric effects of energy efficiency and renewable energy on carbon emissions of BRICS economies: evidence from nonlinear panel autoregressive distributed lag model.能源效率和可再生能源对金砖国家经济碳排放的非对称影响:来自非线性面板自回归分布滞后模型的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 May;27(15):18254-18268. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-08353-8. Epub 2020 Mar 16.
4
Economic policy uncertainty, energy consumption and carbon emissions in G7 countries: evidence from a panel Granger causality analysis.七国集团的经济政策不确定性、能源消费与碳排放:基于面板格兰杰因果关系分析的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Aug;27(24):30050-30066. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-08642-2. Epub 2020 May 23.
5
On the remittances-environment led hypothesis: Empirical evidence from BRICS economies.基于汇款-环境假说的实证研究:来自金砖国家经济体的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 May;27(14):16460-16471. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-07999-8. Epub 2020 Mar 2.
6
A predictive analysis of CO emissions, environmental policy stringency, and economic growth in China.中国二氧化碳排放、环境政策力度与经济增长的预测分析。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2018 Jun;25(16):16091-16100. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-1849-x. Epub 2018 Mar 28.
7
Environmental factors and its influence on human health in BRICS: implications for human development.金砖国家的环境因素及其对人类健康的影响:对人类发展的启示
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Feb;30(9):22509-22519. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-23678-2. Epub 2022 Oct 27.
8
Modelling Economic Growth, Carbon Emissions, and Fossil Fuel Consumption in China: Cointegration and Multivariate Causality.中国经济增长、碳排放和化石燃料消费的建模:协整和多变量因果关系。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Oct 29;16(21):4176. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16214176.
9
Financial development, globalization, and CO emission in the presence of EKC: evidence from BRICS countries.金融发展、全球化与 CO 排放的 EKC 关系:金砖国家的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2018 Nov;25(31):31283-31296. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-3034-7. Epub 2018 Sep 7.
10
Caring for the environment: how CO2 emissions respond to human capital in BRICS economies?关爱环境:金砖国家经济的人力资本如何影响二氧化碳排放?
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Mar;29(12):18036-18046. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-17025-0. Epub 2021 Oct 22.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of environmental regulations on carbon emissions in countries with different levels of emissions.环境法规对不同排放水平国家碳排放的影响。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 Dec;31(59):66759-66779. doi: 10.1007/s11356-024-35702-8. Epub 2024 Dec 6.
2
Setting a shared development agenda: prioritizing the sustainable development goals in the Dominican Republic with fuzzy-LMAW.制定共同发展议程:运用模糊逻辑多标准决策分析对多米尼加共和国的可持续发展目标进行优先排序。
Sci Rep. 2024 May 27;14(1):12146. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-62790-w.
3
Environmental Impact Assessment by Green Processes.绿色工艺的环境影响评估。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 24;19(23):15575. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192315575.
4
Green Paradox or Forced Emission Reduction-The Dual Effects of Environmental Regulation on Carbon Emissions.绿色悖论还是强制减排——环境规制对碳排放的双重影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 3;19(17):11058. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191711058.
5
The Impact of Green Technology Innovation on Carbon Emissions in the Context of Carbon Neutrality in China: Evidence from Spatial Spillover and Nonlinear Effect Analysis.中国碳中和背景下绿色技术创新对碳排放的影响:基于空间溢出和非线性效应的分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 10;19(2):730. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19020730.

本文引用的文献

1
Do environmental taxes and environmental stringency policies reduce CO emissions? Evidence from 7 emerging economies.环境税和环境严格政策是否减少了 CO 排放?来自 7 个新兴经济体的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 May;28(18):22392-22408. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-11475-8. Epub 2021 Jan 8.
2
Environmental policy stringency, related technological change and emissions inventory in 20 OECD countries.20 个经合组织国家的环境政策严格程度、相关技术变革和排放清单。
J Environ Manage. 2020 Nov 15;274:111209. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111209. Epub 2020 Aug 12.
3
Environmental and Health Impacts of Air Pollution: A Review.空气污染的环境与健康影响:综述。
Front Public Health. 2020 Feb 20;8:14. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00014. eCollection 2020.
4
A predictive analysis of CO emissions, environmental policy stringency, and economic growth in China.中国二氧化碳排放、环境政策力度与经济增长的预测分析。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2018 Jun;25(16):16091-16100. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-1849-x. Epub 2018 Mar 28.
5
Health Effects of Ambient Air Pollution in Developing Countries.发展中国家环境空气污染对健康的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Sep 12;14(9):1048. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14091048.
6
On how environmental stringency influences adoption of best management practices in agriculture.论环境严格程度如何影响农业最佳管理实践的采用。
J Environ Manage. 2008 Sep;88(4):1530-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.07.029. Epub 2007 Sep 11.

环境政策严格程度和人类发展水平对 CO 排放有怎样的影响?来自 G7 和金砖国家经济体的证据。

Do Environmental Stringency Policies and Human Development Reduce CO Emissions? Evidence from G7 and BRICS Economies.

机构信息

Department of Industrial Engineering, Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, 34320 Istanbul, Turkey.

Department of Economics, Bandirma Onyedi Eylul University, 10200 Bandirma, Turkey.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 22;18(13):6727. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18136727.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph18136727
PMID:34206509
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8297282/
Abstract

This study explores the impact of environmental policies and human development on the CO emissions for the period of 1995-2015 in the Group of Seven and BRICS economies in the long run through panel cointegration and causality tests. The causality analysis revealed a bilateral causality between environmental stringency policies and CO emissions for Germany, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States of America, and a unilateral causality from CO emissions to the environmental stringency policies for Canada, China, and France. On the other hand, the analysis showed a bilateral causality between human development and CO emissions for Germany, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States of America, and unilateral causality from CO emissions to human development in Brazil, Canada, China, and France. Furthermore, the cointegration analysis indicated that both environmental stringency policies and human development had a decreasing impact on the CO emissions.

摘要

本研究通过面板协整和因果检验,探讨了 1995-2015 年期间,七国集团和金砖国家经济中环境政策和人类发展对 CO2 排放的长期影响。因果分析表明,德国、日本、英国和美国的环境政策严格程度与 CO2 排放之间存在双向因果关系,加拿大、中国和法国的 CO2 排放对环境政策严格程度存在单向因果关系。另一方面,分析表明,德国、日本、英国和美国的人类发展与 CO2 排放之间存在双向因果关系,巴西、加拿大、中国和法国的 CO2 排放对人类发展存在单向因果关系。此外,协整分析表明,环境政策严格程度和人类发展都对 CO2 排放有降低作用。