Pastrav Mihaela, Chisnoiu Andrea Maria, Pastrav Ovidiu, Sarosi Codruta, Pordan Doina, Petean Ioan, Muntean Alexandrina, Moldovan Marioara, Chisnoiu Radu Marcel
Department of Orthodontics, "Iuliu Hațieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 31 Avram Iancu Street, 400117 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Department of Prosthodontics, "Iuliu Hațieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 32 Clinicilor Street, 400006 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Materials (Basel). 2021 Jun 26;14(13):3578. doi: 10.3390/ma14133578.
Orthodontic adhesives have similar properties in terms of fluoride release, roughness, shear bond strength or cement debris for specific clinical conditions. Three commercial consecrated orthodontic adhesives (Opal Seal, Blugloo, Light Bond) were compared with an experimental orthodontic material (C1). Brackets were bonded to enamel using a self-etch technique followed by adhesive application and then de-bonded 60 days later. Share bond strength evaluation, scanning electron microscopy, atomic force microscopy and fluoride release analysis were performed. The highest amount of daily and cumulative fluoride release was obtained for the experimental material, while the lowest value was observed for Opal Seal. The materials evaluated in the current study presented adequate shear bond strength, with the experimental material having a mean value higher than Opal Seal and Blugloo. The atomic force microscopy measurements indicated that the smoothest initial sample is Opal Seal followed by Light Bond. Scanning electron microscopy evaluation indicated different aspects of cement debris on the enamel and/or bracket surface, according to the type of adhesive. The experimental material C1 presented adequate properties in terms of shear bond strength, fluoride release, roughness and enamel characteristics after de-bonding, compared to the commercial materials. Under these circumstances, it can be considered for clinical testing.
在特定临床条件下,正畸粘合剂在氟化物释放、粗糙度、剪切粘结强度或粘结剂残渣方面具有相似的性能。将三种市售正畸粘合剂(Opal Seal、Blugloo、Light Bond)与一种实验性正畸材料(C1)进行比较。采用自酸蚀技术将托槽粘结到牙釉质上,随后涂抹粘合剂,60天后进行脱粘。进行了剪切粘结强度评估、扫描电子显微镜检查、原子力显微镜检查和氟化物释放分析。实验材料的每日和累积氟化物释放量最高,而Opal Seal的释放量最低。本研究中评估的材料具有足够的剪切粘结强度,实验材料的平均值高于Opal Seal和Blugloo。原子力显微镜测量表明,最光滑的初始样品是Opal Seal,其次是Light Bond。扫描电子显微镜评估表明,根据粘合剂的类型,牙釉质和/或托槽表面的粘结剂残渣呈现出不同的情况。与市售材料相比,实验材料C1在脱粘后的剪切粘结强度、氟化物释放、粗糙度和牙釉质特性方面具有足够的性能。在这种情况下,可以考虑进行临床试验。