Department of Dentistry and Oral Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Department of Dentistry and Oral Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark, e-mail:
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2021 Mar 1;22(3):207-214.
This study assesses changes in the sella turcica area (STA) and location of the cephalometric point sella (S) on lateral cephalograms acquired by charge-coupled device (CCD)-based cephalostats with and without simulated patient head movements.
A real skull was placed on a robot, able to simulate four head movements (anteroposterior translation/lifting/nodding/lateral rotation) at three distances (0.75/1.5/3 mm) and two patterns (returning to 0.5 mm away from the start position/staying at maximum movement excursion). Two ProMax-2D cephalostats (Dimax-3, D-3 or Dimax-4, D-4), and an Orthophos-SL cephalostat (ORT) acquired cephalograms during the predetermined movements ("cases," 48 images/unit) and without movement ("controls," 24 images/unit). Three observers manually traced the contour of sella turcica and marked point sella using a computer mouse. STA was calculated in pixels by dedicated software based on the tracing. S was defined by its and coordinates recorded by the same software in pixels. Ten percent of the images were assessed twice. The difference between cases and controls (case control) for the STA and S (namely Diff-STA and Diff-S) was calculated and assessed through descriptive statistics.
Inter- and intraobserver agreement ranged from moderate to good for STA and S. Diff-STA ranged from -42.5 to 12.9% (D-3), -15.3 to 9.6% (D-4), and -25.3 to 39.9% (ORT). Diff-S was represented up to 50% (D-3), 134% (D-4), and 103% (ORT) of the mean sella turcica diameter in control images.
Simulated head movements caused significant distortion in lateral cephalograms acquired by CCD-based cephalostats, as seen from STA and S alterations, depending on the cephalostat.
Patient-related errors, including patient motion artifacts, are influential factors for the reliability of cephalometric tracing.
本研究评估了在电荷耦合器件(CCD)-基于头架获取的侧位头颅片中,蝶鞍区(STA)和颅测点蝶鞍(S)的位置在有和没有模拟患者头部运动的情况下的变化。
一个真实的颅骨被放置在一个机器人上,该机器人能够模拟四个头部运动(前后平移/提升/点头/侧向旋转),距离为 0.75/1.5/3 毫米,两种模式(回到距离起始位置 0.5 毫米/保持在最大运动幅度)。两台 ProMax-2D 头架(Dimax-3,D-3 或 Dimax-4,D-4)和一台 Orthophos-SL 头架(ORT)在预定运动期间(“病例”,48 张图像/单位)和无运动期间(“对照”,24 张图像/单位)获取侧位头颅片。三位观察者使用计算机鼠标手动追踪蝶鞍的轮廓并标记蝶鞍点。STA 通过专用软件基于追踪计算以像素为单位进行计算。S 由同一软件以像素为单位记录的 和 坐标定义。10%的图像评估两次。STA 和 S 的病例与对照之间的差异(即 Diff-STA 和 Diff-S)通过描述性统计进行计算和评估。
STA 和 S 的观察者间和观察者内一致性从中等到良好。Diff-STA 范围为-42.5%至 12.9%(D-3)、-15.3%至 9.6%(D-4)和-25.3%至 39.9%(ORT)。Diff-S 高达控制图像蝶鞍直径的 50%(D-3)、134%(D-4)和 103%(ORT)。
模拟的头部运动会导致 CCD 基于头架获取的侧位头颅片中出现明显的失真,从 STA 和 S 的改变可以看出,这取决于头架。
包括患者运动伪影在内的患者相关误差是影响头测追踪可靠性的因素。