School of Human Kinetics and Recreation, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada.
Centre for Sport Research, School of Exercise & Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia.
J Sports Sci Med. 2021 Mar 15;20(2):300-309. doi: 10.52082/jssm.2021.300. eCollection 2021 Jun.
Non-local muscle fatigue (NLMF) studies have examined crossover impairments of maximal voluntary force output in non-exercised, contralateral muscles as well as comparing upper and lower limb muscles. Since prior studies primarily investigated contralateral muscles, the purpose of this study was to compare NLMF effects on elbow flexors (EF) and plantar flexors (PF) force and activation (electromyography: EMG). Secondly, possible differences when testing ipsilateral or contralateral muscles with a single or repeated isometric maximum voluntary contractions (MVC) were also investigated. Twelve participants (six males: (27.3 ± 2.5 years, 186.0 ± 2.2 cm, 91.0 ± 4.1 kg; six females: 23.0 ± 1.6 years, 168.2 ± 6.7 cm, 60.0 ± 4.3 kg) attended six randomized sessions where ipsilateral or contralateral PF or EF MVC force and EMG activity (root mean square) were tested following a dominant knee extensors (KE) fatigue intervention (2×100s MVC) or equivalent rest (control). Testing involving a single MVC (5s) was completed by the ipsilateral or contralateral PF or EF prior to and immediately post-interventions. One minute after the post-intervention single MVC, a 12×5s MVCs fatigue test was completed. Two-way repeated measures ANOVAs revealed that ipsilateral EF post-fatigue force was lower (-6.6%, p = 0.04, d = 0.18) than pre-fatigue with no significant changes in the contralateral or control conditions. EF demonstrated greater fatigue indexes for the ipsilateral (9.5%, p = 0.04, d = 0.75) and contralateral (20.3%, p < 0.01, d = 1.50) EF over the PF, respectively. There were no significant differences in PF force, EMG or EF EMG post-test or during the MVCs fatigue test. The results suggest that NLMF effects are side and muscle specific where prior KE fatigue could hinder subsequent ipsilateral upper body performance and thus is an important consideration for rehabilitation, recreation and athletic programs.
非局部肌肉疲劳(NLMF)研究已经检查了未受锻炼的对侧肌肉的最大自愿力输出的交叉损伤,以及比较了上下肢肌肉。由于先前的研究主要研究了对侧肌肉,因此本研究的目的是比较 NLMF 对肘部屈肌(EF)和足底屈肌(PF)力和激活(肌电图:EMG)的影响。其次,还研究了使用单次或重复等长最大自愿收缩(MVC)测试同侧或对侧肌肉时可能存在的差异。12 名参与者(6 名男性:(27.3 ± 2.5 岁,186.0 ± 2.2 厘米,91.0 ± 4.1 千克;6 名女性:23.0 ± 1.6 岁,168.2 ± 6.7 厘米,60.0 ± 4.3 千克)参加了六个随机会议,在进行优势膝伸肌(KE)疲劳干预(2×100s MVC)或等效休息(对照)后,测试同侧或对侧 PF 或 EF MVC 力和 EMG 活动(均方根)。在干预之前和之后,同侧或对侧 PF 或 EF 进行了单次 MVC(5s)的测试。在单次 MVC 后 1 分钟,进行了 12×5s MVCs 疲劳测试。双向重复测量方差分析显示,同侧 EF 疲劳后的力量比疲劳前低(-6.6%,p = 0.04,d = 0.18),而对侧或对照条件没有明显变化。EF 显示同侧(9.5%,p = 0.04,d = 0.75)和对侧(20.3%,p < 0.01,d = 1.50)EF 的疲劳指数均大于 PF。测试后或在 MVCs 疲劳测试过程中,PF 力、EMG 或 EF EMG 没有差异。结果表明,NLMF 效应是特定于侧和肌肉的,先前的 KE 疲劳可能会阻碍随后的同侧上半身表现,因此对于康复、娱乐和运动计划是一个重要的考虑因素。