Farid Mohammed, Al Omran Yasser, Lewis Darren, Kay Alan
Burn Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Department of Plastic Surgery, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Scars Burn Heal. 2021 Jun 17;7:20595131211020566. doi: 10.1177/20595131211020566. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
The UK government introduced lockdown measures on 23 March 2020 due to the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. A restructuring of clinical services was necessary to accommodate mandatory changes while also maintaining the best possible standards for patient care. The present study explored the initial management, follow-up and patient-reported outcomes of burn injuries <15% total body surface area (TBSA) during the height of the COVID-19 lockdown at a tertiary burns centre.
A retrospective review of all adult patients with burns <15% TBSA during the national lockdown (23 March 2020 to 10 May 2020) was undertaken at The Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham (QEHB), UK. All referrals from non-QEHB telemedicine (external) or QEHB emergency (internal) departments were reviewed for management, length of hospital stay and pattern of follow-up (ward attender, self-care, community or outreach nurses). A telephone survey based on a structured questionnaire was conducted to establish patients' satisfaction.
A total of 84 burn patients were included in the study. The mean age was 39 years (age range = 19-91 years) and the male:female ratio was 4:1. Patients were managed non-operatively (n = 69, 82%) or operatively (n = 15, 18%). Patients attended the ward attender acute burns clinic only once (n = 36, 61%). The telephone survey captured 70% (n = 59) of the study population and 57 patients (97% of respondents) were pleased with the ongoing care and burn healing.
The integration of patient led self-care, reduction in admissions, minimal clinics attendance and a telemedicine follow-up is an effective model for small burns management during the COVID-19 pandemic. A high degree of patient satisfaction was achieved with continuous and approachable communication channels with the burn multidisciplinary team. We continue to implement this effective model of burns management throughout the COVID-19 pandemic and the subsequent period.
The lockdown measures due to the first wave of COVID-19 pandemic affected the way we manage all medical emergencies including burns. The initial management, follow-up and patient satisfaction for small burn injuries during lockdown has not been reported previously. The aim of this study is to examine the outcome in terms of small burn management, hospital stay, number of clinic reviews, healing and patient satisfaction during the lockdown period in a burn centre in the UK. This would look at the need for operations and whether patients stayed longer if they required an intervention. We reviewed adult patients with small burns during the national lockdown (23 March 2020 to 10 May 2020) at The Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham (QEHB). All referrals from telemedicine, referral system (external) or QEHB (internal) were reviewed for management, length of hospital stay and pattern of follow-up. Patients were reviewed in the acute burns clinic and given advice for burn management and dressing for self-care. Follow-up was mostly via email (telemedicine) A telephone survey based on a structured questionnaire was conducted to find out patients' satisfaction. Four times more men than women had small burns during the lockdown period. The average age was 39 years. The majority were managed conservatively with dressings (82%) and a small proportion required an operation (18%). Most patients attended the acute burns clinic only once (61%) for initial assessment and management. The telephone survey captured 70% of patient and 97% of respondents were pleased with the care and burn healing. The integration of patient-led self-care, reduction in admissions, minimal clinics attendance and a telemedicine follow-up is an effective model for burns management during the COVID-19 pandemic. A high degree of patient satisfaction was achieved with continuous and approachable communication channels with burn multidisciplinary team. We continue to implement this effective model of burns management throughout the COVID-19 pandemic and the subsequent period.
由于2020年第一波新冠疫情,英国政府于2020年3月23日出台了封锁措施。为适应强制性变化,同时维持尽可能高的患者护理标准,临床服务进行了重组。本研究探讨了在新冠疫情封锁高峰期,一家三级烧伤中心内,烧伤总面积小于15%(TBSA)的患者的初始管理、随访情况以及患者报告的结果。
对英国伯明翰伊丽莎白女王医院(QEHB)在全国封锁期间(2020年3月23日至2020年5月10日)所有烧伤总面积小于15%的成年患者进行回顾性研究。对所有来自非QEHB远程医疗(外部)或QEHB急诊科(内部)的转诊病例进行管理、住院时间和随访模式(病房护理、自我护理、社区或外展护士)方面的审查。基于结构化问卷进行电话调查,以确定患者的满意度。
本研究共纳入84例烧伤患者。平均年龄为39岁(年龄范围 = 19 - 91岁),男女比例为4:1。患者接受非手术治疗(n = 69,82%)或手术治疗(n = 15,18%)。患者仅到病房护理急性烧伤诊所就诊一次(n = 36,61%)。电话调查涵盖了70%(n = 59)的研究人群,57名患者(占受访者的97%)对持续护理和烧伤愈合情况感到满意。
患者主导的自我护理、减少入院人数、尽量减少门诊就诊次数以及远程医疗随访相结合,是新冠疫情期间小面积烧伤管理的有效模式。通过与烧伤多学科团队保持持续且易于沟通的渠道,实现了高度的患者满意度。我们在整个新冠疫情期间及后续阶段继续实施这种有效的烧伤管理模式。
第一波新冠疫情导致的封锁措施影响了我们处理包括烧伤在内的所有医疗紧急情况的方式。此前尚未有关于封锁期间小面积烧伤的初始管理、随访情况及患者满意度的报道。本研究的目的是考察英国一家烧伤中心在封锁期间小面积烧伤管理、住院时间、门诊复查次数、愈合情况及患者满意度方面的结果。这将研究手术需求以及如果患者需要干预是否会住院更长时间。我们回顾了伯明翰伊丽莎白女王医院(QEHB)在全国封锁期间(2020年3月23日至2020年5月10日)的小面积烧伤成年患者。对所有来自远程医疗、转诊系统(外部)或QEHB(内部)的转诊病例进行管理、住院时间和随访模式方面的审查。患者在急性烧伤诊所接受复查,并获得烧伤管理和自我护理换药的建议。随访大多通过电子邮件(远程医疗)进行。基于结构化问卷进行电话调查以了解患者满意度。封锁期间,男性小面积烧伤患者数量是女性的四倍。平均年龄为39岁。大多数患者采用敷料保守治疗(82%),一小部分需要手术(18%)。大多数患者仅到急性烧伤诊所就诊一次(61%)进行初始评估和管理。电话调查涵盖了70%的患者,97%的受访者对护理和烧伤愈合情况感到满意。患者主导的自我护理、减少入院人数、尽量减少门诊就诊次数以及远程医疗随访相结合,是新冠疫情期间烧伤管理的有效模式。通过与烧伤多学科团队保持持续且易于沟通 的渠道,实现了高度的患者满意度。我们在整个新冠疫情期间及后续阶段继续实施这种有效的烧伤管理模式。