Mansouri Houyem, Zemni Ines, Achouri Leila, Mahjoub Najet, Ayedi Mohamed Ali, Ben Safta Ines, Ben Dhiab Tarek, Chargui Riadh, Rahal Khaled
Department of Surgical Oncology, Salah Azaiez institute of oncology, Faculty of Medicine of Tunis, University of Tunis El Manar, Tunisia.
Laboratory of Microorganisms and Active Biomolecules, Faculty of sciences, University of Tunis El Manar, Tunisia.
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2021 Apr 14;26(2):266-280. doi: 10.5603/RPOR.a2021.0040. eCollection 2021.
The management of gastric adenocarcinoma is essentially based on surgery followed by adjuvant treatment. Adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) as well as chemoradiotherapy (CTRT) have proven their effectiveness in survival outcomes compared to surgery alone. However, there is little data comparing the two adjuvant approaches. This study aimed to compare the prognosis and survival outcomes of patients with gastric adenocarcinoma operated and treated by adjuvant radio-chemotherapy or chemotherapy.
We retrospectively evaluated 80 patients with locally advanced gastric cancer (LGC) who received adjuvant treatment. We compared survival outcomes and patterns of recurrence of 53 patients treated by CTRT and those of 27 patients treated by CT.
After a median follow-up of 38.48 months, CTRT resulted in a significant improvement of the 5-year PFS (60.9% 36%, p = 0.03) and the 5-year OS (55.9% 33%, p = 0.015) compared to adjuvant CT. The 5-year OS was significantly increased by adjuvant CTRT (p = 0.046) in patients with lymph node metastasis, and particularly those with advanced pN stage (p = 0.0078) and high lymph node ratio (LNR) exceeding 25% (p = 0.012). Also, there was a significant improvement of the PFS of patients classified pN2-N3 (p = 0.022) with a high LNR (p = 0.018). CTRT was also associated with improved OS and PFS in patients with lymphovascular and perineural invasion (LVI and PNI) compared to chemotherapy.
There is a particular survival benefit of adding radiotherapy to chemotherapy in patients with selected criteria such as lymph node involvement, high LNR LVI, and PNI.
胃腺癌的治疗主要基于手术,随后进行辅助治疗。与单纯手术相比,辅助化疗(CT)以及放化疗(CTRT)已在生存结局方面证明了其有效性。然而,比较这两种辅助治疗方法的数据很少。本研究旨在比较接受辅助放化疗或化疗的胃腺癌手术患者的预后和生存结局。
我们回顾性评估了80例接受辅助治疗的局部晚期胃癌(LGC)患者。我们比较了53例接受CTRT治疗的患者和27例接受CT治疗的患者的生存结局和复发模式。
中位随访38.48个月后,与辅助CT相比,CTRT使5年无进展生存期(PFS)显著提高(60.9%对36%,p = 0.03),5年总生存期(OS)显著提高(55.9%对33%,p = 0.015)。在有淋巴结转移的患者中,尤其是那些pN分期较晚(p = 0.0078)和淋巴结比率(LNR)超过25%(p = 0.012)的患者,辅助CTRT显著提高了5年OS(p = 0.046)。此外,LNR较高(p = 0.018)的pN2 - N3期患者的PFS也有显著改善(p = 0.022)。与化疗相比,CTRT在有淋巴管和神经周围侵犯(LVI和PNI)的患者中也与OS和PFS的改善相关。
对于有特定标准如淋巴结受累、高LNR、LVI和PNI的患者,在化疗中加入放疗有特别的生存益处。