Suppr超能文献

坐骨包容与坐骨窝在单侧股骨截肢者舒适度、功能、生活质量和对装置满意度方面的比较:一项随机交叉试验。

Comparison of Ischial Containment and Subischial Sockets on Comfort, Function, Quality of Life, and Satisfaction With Device in Persons With Unilateral Transfemoral Amputation: A Randomized Crossover Trial.

机构信息

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL.

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL; Scheck and Siress Prosthetics and Orthotics, Chicago, IL; Hanger Clinic, Austin, TX.

出版信息

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2021 Nov;102(11):2063-2073.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2021.05.016. Epub 2021 Jun 29.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare comfort and functional performance of the Northwestern University Flexible Subischial Vacuum (NU-FlexSIV) Socket with the ischial containment (IC) socket in persons with unilateral transfemoral amputation.

DESIGN

Randomized crossover trial with two 7-week periods.

SETTING

Private prosthetic clinics and university research laboratory.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 30 enrolled (N=30); 25 participants completed the study with full (n=18) or partial data (n=7).

INTERVENTIONS

Two custom-fabricated sockets (IC and NU-FlexSIV), worn full-time for 7 weeks, with testing at 1, 4, and 7 weeks after socket delivery.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was change in Socket Comfort Score (SCS) at 7 weeks. Secondary outcomes at 7 weeks included the Orthotic and Prosthetic Users' Survey (OPUS) to assess lower extremity functional status, health-related quality of life, and satisfaction with device, as well as the 5-Times Rapid Sit-to-Stand Test, Four Square Step Test, and T-Test of Agility to assess functional performance.

RESULTS

At 7 weeks, the mean SCS for IC (7.0±1.7) and NU-FlexSIV (8.4±1.1) Sockets were significantly different (P<.001; 95% confidence interval, 0.8-2.3). Results from a linear mixed-effects model, accounting for data from all time points, indicated that the SCS was 1.7 (SE=0.45) points higher for the NU-FlexSIV Socket (P<.001). For the secondary outcomes, only OPUS satisfaction with device was significantly better in the NU-FlexSIV Socket after accounting for all data points.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that after 7 weeks' accommodation, the NU-FlexSIV Socket was more comfortable and led to greater satisfaction with device than the IC socket in persons with unilateral transfemoral amputation and K3/K4 mobility. Other patient-reported outcomes and function were no different between sockets.

摘要

目的

比较西北大学柔性坐骨下真空(NU-FlexSIV)插座与坐骨包容(IC)插座在单侧股骨截肢患者中的舒适度和功能表现。

设计

随机交叉试验,两个 7 周周期。

设置

私人假肢诊所和大学研究实验室。

参与者

共纳入 30 人(N=30);25 名参与者完成了研究,其中 18 名完成了全部数据,7 名完成了部分数据。

干预措施

两种定制插座(IC 和 NU-FlexSIV),佩戴 7 周,在插座交付后 1、4 和 7 周进行测试。

主要观察指标

主要结果是 7 周时插座舒适度评分(SCS)的变化。7 周时的次要结果包括矫形和假肢使用者调查(OPUS),以评估下肢功能状态、健康相关生活质量和对设备的满意度,以及 5 次快速坐立测试、四方步测试和敏捷 T 测试,以评估功能表现。

结果

7 周时,IC(7.0±1.7)和 NU-FlexSIV(8.4±1.1)插座的平均 SCS 差异有统计学意义(P<.001;95%置信区间,0.8-2.3)。线性混合效应模型分析所有时间点的数据表明,NU-FlexSIV 插座的 SCS 高 1.7(SE=0.45)分(P<.001)。对于次要结果,仅在考虑所有数据点后,NU-FlexSIV 插座的 OPUS 对设备的满意度显著更高。

结论

结果表明,在适应 7 周后,NU-FlexSIV 插座在单侧股骨截肢和 K3/K4 活动能力患者中比 IC 插座更舒适,患者对设备的满意度更高。其他患者报告的结果和功能在插座之间没有差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验