Department of Radiation Oncology, Houston Methodist Hospital, United States.
Department of Biology, Rice University, Houston, United States.
Radiother Oncol. 2021 Sep;162:52-59. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.06.032. Epub 2021 Jun 29.
The utility of post-mastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) in women with a nodal complete response (CRn) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is unknown. The NSABP B-51 trial is evaluating this question, but has not reported results thus far. Therefore, we sought to answer this question with the National Cancer Database.
The National Cancer Database was queried for women with cT1-4N1-3M0 breast cancer who had undergone NAC and were ypN0 upon mastectomy. Statistics included multivariable logistic regression, Kaplan-Meier overall survival (OS) analysis, Cox proportional hazards modeling, and construction of forest plots.
Of 14,690 women, 10,092 (69%) underwent adjuvant PMRT and 4598 (31%) did not. The median follow-up was 55.6 months. In all patients, the 10-year OS was 76.3% for PMRT and 78.6% without (p = 0.412). There were no notable effects of PMRT on OS based on age or the axillary management (number of nodes removed). Specifically, in the NSABP B-51 population of cT1-3 cN1 patients, the 10-year OS was 82.6% for PMRT and 80.0% without (p = 0.250). PMRT benefitted women with increasing cT stage (i.e. cT3-4), increasing ypT stages (with the exception of ypT4 potentially owing to small sample sizes), and cN3 cases (p < 0.05 for all).
In the absence of published results from NSABP B-51, this assessment of over 14,000 women from a contemporary US database revealed that PMRT may be most useful for a "moderately-high" risk group - women with more advanced primary and/or nodal disease at diagnosis, yet with tumor biology favorable enough that the disease does not progress or remain stable after NAC. The OS findings notwithstanding, this study cannot exclude potential differences between groups in recurrence-free survival, which is the primary endpoint of NSABP B-51, While the results of the NSABP B-51 will confirm optimal management for patients with limited nodal disease having a CRn following NAC, the present results suggest PMRT should remain the standard of care for more advanced disease than NSABP B-51 eligibility criteria.
新辅助化疗(NAC)后淋巴结完全缓解(CRn)的女性接受乳房切除术放疗(PMRT)的效用尚不清楚。NSABP B-51 试验正在对此问题进行评估,但迄今为止尚未报告结果。因此,我们试图利用国家癌症数据库来回答这个问题。
国家癌症数据库被查询了接受 NAC 且乳房切除术后 ypN0 的 cT1-4N1-3M0 乳腺癌女性。统计数据包括多变量逻辑回归、Kaplan-Meier 总体生存(OS)分析、Cox 比例风险建模和森林图的构建。
在 14690 名女性中,10092 名(69%)接受了辅助 PMRT,4598 名(31%)未接受。中位随访时间为 55.6 个月。在所有患者中,PMRT 的 10 年 OS 为 76.3%,无 PMRT 的为 78.6%(p=0.412)。根据年龄或腋窝管理(切除的淋巴结数量),PMRT 对 OS 没有明显影响。具体来说,在 NSABP B-51 的 cT1-3 cN1 患者人群中,PMRT 的 10 年 OS 为 82.6%,无 PMRT 的为 80.0%(p=0.250)。PMRT 使 cT 分期更高(即 cT3-4)、ypT 分期更高(除 ypT4 外,可能由于样本量较小)和 cN3 病例的女性受益(p<0.05 )。
在 NSABP B-51 的结果未公布的情况下,对来自当代美国数据库的 14000 多名女性进行的这项评估表明,PMRT 可能对“中度高”风险组最有用——这些女性在诊断时具有更晚期的原发性和/或淋巴结疾病,但肿瘤生物学足够有利,以至于疾病在 NAC 后不会进展或保持稳定。尽管 OS 发现如此,但本研究不能排除 NSABP B-51 主要终点为无复发生存率的组之间可能存在差异。虽然 NSABP B-51 的结果将证实对 NAC 后淋巴结完全缓解且淋巴结疾病有限的患者的最佳治疗方法,但目前的结果表明,PMRT 应继续作为比 NSABP B-51 入选标准更晚期疾病的标准治疗方法。