• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Letter to the Editor - Not even the top general medical journals are free of spin: A wake-up call based on an overview of reviews.

作者信息

Nascimento D P, Almeida M O, Scola Lfc, Vanin A A, Oliveira L A, Costa Lcm, Costa Lop

机构信息

Masters and Doctoral Programs in Physical Therapy, Universidade Cidade de São Paulo, São Paulo/SP, Brazil.

Masters and Doctoral Programs in Physical Therapy, Universidade Cidade de São Paulo, São Paulo/SP, Brazil; Research and Study Center, Wilson Mello Institute, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Nov;139:232-234. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.06.016. Epub 2021 Jun 29.

DOI:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.06.016
PMID:34214625
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Letter to the Editor - Not even the top general medical journals are free of spin: A wake-up call based on an overview of reviews.致编辑的信——即使是顶级综合医学期刊也未能免俗：基于综述概述的警钟。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Nov;139:232-234. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.06.016. Epub 2021 Jun 29.
2
Multi-authors' self-citation: a further impact factor bias?多位作者的自引：另一种影响因子偏差？
Cortex. 2008 Oct;44(9):1139-45. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2008.07.001. Epub 2008 Jul 6.
3
Are top journals biased against eating disorders topics?顶级期刊是否对饮食失调主题存在偏见？
Am J Psychiatry. 2003 Feb;160(2):363-5. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.160.2.363.
4
A survey of prevalence of narrative and systematic reviews in five major medical journals.五项主要医学期刊中叙事性和系统性综述的流行情况调查。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017 Dec 28;17(1):176. doi: 10.1186/s12874-017-0453-y.
5
Beyond the Impact Factor.超越影响因子
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2019 Mar 1;46(2):143-145. doi: 10.1188/19.ONF.143-145.
6
Biomedical journals in Croatia.克罗地亚的生物医学期刊。
Croat Med J. 2002 Jun;43(3):355-6; author reply 356.
7
Publishing opportunities for nurses: a comparison of 92 U.S. journals.护士的发表机会：92种美国期刊的比较
Image J Nurs Sch. 1991 Spring;23(1):33-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.1991.tb00632.x.
8
Spine journals: is reviewer agreement on publication recommendations greater than would be expected by chance?脊柱期刊：审稿人对出版建议的意见一致性是否大于偶然情况下的预期？
Spine J. 2010 Mar;10(3):209-11. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2009.12.003.
9
Medical journals in the West and in India.西方和印度的医学期刊。
Natl Med J India. 1992 Jul-Aug;5(4):155-6.
10
[How to improve the statistical quality of articles presented to biomedical journals: a checklist for authors].[如何提高提交给生物医学期刊文章的统计质量：作者核对清单]
Med Clin (Barc). 1999 Jul 3;113(4):138-49.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinicians: beware of "spin".临床医生：谨防“误导”。
Evid Based Dent. 2024 Mar;25(1):1-2. doi: 10.1038/s41432-024-00984-x.
2
Abstracts of randomized controlled trials in pediatric dentistry: reporting quality and spin.儿童牙科随机对照试验摘要：报告质量与倾向性
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2023 Nov 10;23(1):263. doi: 10.1186/s12874-023-02085-2.
3
How to make a systematic review live up to its name: perspectives from journal editors.如何让系统评价名副其实：来自期刊编辑的观点
Ann Transl Med. 2023 Jun 30;11(9):325. doi: 10.21037/atm-22-6305. Epub 2023 May 10.
4
Guidance to best tools and practices for systematic reviews1.系统评价最佳工具和实践指南 1.
J Pediatr Rehabil Med. 2023;16(2):241-273. doi: 10.3233/PRM-230019.
5
Guidance to best tools and practices for systematic reviews.系统评价最佳工具和实践指南。
Syst Rev. 2023 Jun 8;12(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s13643-023-02255-9.
6
Guidance to best tools and practices for systematic reviews.系统评价最佳工具和实践指南。
BMC Infect Dis. 2023 Jun 8;23(1):383. doi: 10.1186/s12879-023-08304-x.