How to make a systematic review live up to its name: perspectives from journal editors.
作者信息
Shang Binghan, Lin Yao, Yang Fanghui, Zhang Kaiping
机构信息
Editorial Office, Annals of Translational Medicine, AME Publishing Company, Hong Kong, China.
出版信息
Ann Transl Med. 2023 Jun 30;11(9):325. doi: 10.21037/atm-22-6305. Epub 2023 May 10.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
How to make a systematic review live up to its name: perspectives from journal editors.如何让系统评价名副其实：来自期刊编辑的观点
Ann Transl Med. 2023 Jun 30;11(9):325. doi: 10.21037/atm-22-6305. Epub 2023 May 10.
2
Journal editors' perspectives on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in biomedical journals: a qualitative study.医学期刊编辑对生物医学期刊同行评审员角色和任务的看法：一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 24;9(11):e033421. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033421.
3
Journal editors' perspectives on the communication practices in biomedical journals: a qualitative study.期刊编辑对生物医学期刊交流实践的看法：一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Aug 13;10(8):e035600. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035600.
4
PEER-REVIEWED JOURNAL EDITORS' VIEWS ON REAL-WORLD EVIDENCE.同行评议期刊编辑对真实世界证据的看法。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2018 Jan;34(1):111-119. doi: 10.1017/S0266462317004408. Epub 2018 Feb 8.
5
Advertising in dermatology journals: journals' and journal editors' policies, practices, and attitudes.皮肤科期刊中的广告：期刊及期刊编辑的政策、做法和态度。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2006 Jul;55(1):116-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2006.01.046.
6
Key elements required to publish a good article: consensus among executive editors of Traditional Chinese Medicine and integrative medicine journals - a Delphi study.发表一篇优秀文章所需的关键要素：中医与中西医结合期刊执行编辑之间的共识——一项德尔菲研究
J Tradit Chin Med. 2015 Jun;35(3):335-42. doi: 10.1016/s0254-6272(15)30107-2.
7
Authors' and editors' perspectives on peer review quality in three scholarly nursing journals.三位学者及编辑对三本护理学术期刊同行评审质量的看法。
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2010 Mar;42(1):58-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2009.01331.x.
8
Perspectives From Authors and Editors in the Biomedical Disciplines on Predatory Journals: Survey Study.生物医学学科领域的作者与编辑对掠夺性期刊的看法：调查研究
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Aug 30;21(8):e13769. doi: 10.2196/13769.
9
Publication ethics: editors' perspectives.出版伦理：编辑视角
J Pediatr. 2006 Jul;149(1 Suppl):S39-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2006.04.050.
10
Life and times of the impact factor: retrospective analysis of trends for seven medical journals (1994-2005) and their Editors' views.影响因子的发展历程：对七本医学期刊（1994 - 2005年）趋势的回顾性分析及其编辑观点
J R Soc Med. 2007 Mar;100(3):142-50. doi: 10.1177/014107680710000313.
本文引用的文献
1
The problems with systematic reviews: a living systematic review.系统评价的问题：一项实时的系统评价。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2023 Apr;156:30-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.01.011. Epub 2023 Feb 14.
2
Types and associated methodologies of overviews of reviews in health care: a methodological study with published examples.医疗保健领域综述的类型及相关方法：一项包含已发表实例的方法学研究
J Clin Epidemiol. 2023 Jan;153:13-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.11.003. Epub 2022 Nov 6.
3
Systematic review automation tools improve efficiency but lack of knowledge impedes their adoption: a survey.系统评价自动化工具可提高效率，但知识的匮乏阻碍了其应用：一项调查。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Oct;138:80-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.06.030. Epub 2021 Jul 7.
4
Letter to the Editor - Not even the top general medical journals are free of spin: A wake-up call based on an overview of reviews.致编辑的信——即使是顶级综合医学期刊也未能免俗：基于综述概述的警钟。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Nov;139:232-234. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.06.016. Epub 2021 Jun 29.
5
The Impact of Systematic Review Automation Tools on Methodological Quality and Time Taken to Complete Systematic Review Tasks: Case Study.系统评价自动化工具对方法学质量及完成系统评价任务所需时间的影响：案例研究
JMIR Med Educ. 2021 May 31;7(2):e24418. doi: 10.2196/24418.
6
Global mapping of overviews of systematic reviews in healthcare published between 2000 and 2020: a bibliometric analysis.2000 年至 2020 年期间发表的医疗保健系统评价概述的全球图谱：文献计量分析。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Sep;137:58-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.03.019. Epub 2021 Mar 26.
7
The views of health guideline developers on the use of automation in health evidence synthesis.健康指南制定者对自动化在健康证据综合中的使用的看法。
Syst Rev. 2021 Jan 8;10(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s13643-020-01569-2.
8
The semi-automation of title and abstract screening: a retrospective exploration of ways to leverage Abstrackr's relevance predictions in systematic and rapid reviews.标题和摘要筛选的半自动化：一种利用 Abstrackr 的相关性预测进行系统和快速综述的回溯性探索方法。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 Jun 3;20(1):139. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-01031-w.
9
Meeting the review family: exploring review types and associated information retrieval requirements.满足审稿人需求：探索审稿类型及相关信息检索要求。
Health Info Libr J. 2019 Sep;36(3):202-222. doi: 10.1111/hir.12276.
10
Assessment of Publication Trends of Systematic Reviews and Randomized Clinical Trials, 1995 to 2017.1995年至2017年系统评价和随机临床试验的发表趋势评估
JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Nov 1;179(11):1593-1594. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.3013.
Zotero 插件