• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

超越 Sedlis——一种新的组织学特异性列线图,用于预测宫颈癌复发风险:NRG/GOG 辅助分析。

Beyond Sedlis-A novel histology-specific nomogram for predicting cervical cancer recurrence risk: An NRG/GOG ancillary analysis.

机构信息

Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.

NRG Oncology, Clinical Trial Development Division, Biostatistics & Bioinformatics, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, United States of America.

出版信息

Gynecol Oncol. 2021 Sep;162(3):532-538. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.06.017. Epub 2021 Jul 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.06.017
PMID:34217544
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8405564/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The Sedlis criteria define risk factors for recurrence warranting post-hysterectomy radiation for early-stage cervical cancer; however, these factors were defined for squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) at an estimated recurrence risk of ≥30%. Our study evaluates and compares risk factors for recurrence for cervical SCC compared with adenocarcinoma (AC) and develops histology-specific nomograms to estimate risk of recurrence and guide adjuvant treatment.

METHODS

We performed an ancillary analysis of GOG 49, 92, and 141, and included stage I patients who were surgically managed and received no neoadjuvant/adjuvant therapy. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate independent risk factors for recurrence by histology and to generate prognostic histology-specific nomograms for 3-year recurrence risk.

RESULTS

We identified 715 patients with SCC and 105 with AC; 20% with SCC and 17% with AC recurred. For SCC, lymphvascular space invasion (LVSI: HR 1.58, CI 1.12-2.22), tumor size (TS ≥4 cm: HR 2.67, CI 1.67-4.29), and depth of invasion (DOI; middle 1/3, HR 4.31, CI 1.81-10.26; deep 1/3, HR 7.05, CI 2.99-16.64) were associated with recurrence. For AC, only TS ≥4 cm, was associated with recurrence (HR 4.69, CI 1.25-17.63). For both histologies, there was an interaction effect between TS and LVSI. For those with SCC, DOI was most associated with recurrence (16% risk); for AC, TS conferred a 15% risk with negative LVSI versus a 25% risk with positive LVSI.

CONCLUSIONS

Current treatment standards are based on the Sedlis criteria, specifically derived from data on SCC. However, risk factors for recurrence differ for squamous cell and adenocarcinoma of the cervix. Histology-specific nomograms accurately and linearly represent risk of recurrence for both SCC and AC tumors and may provide a more contemporary and tailored tool for clinicians to base adjuvant treatment recommendations to their patients with cervical cancer.

摘要

目的

Sedlis 标准定义了早期宫颈癌子宫切除术后需要放疗的复发危险因素;然而,这些因素是针对鳞状细胞癌 (SCC) 定义的,复发风险估计≥30%。我们的研究评估并比较了 SCC 与腺癌 (AC) 的复发危险因素,并制定了组织学特异性列线图来估计复发风险并指导辅助治疗。

方法

我们对 GOG 49、92 和 141 进行了辅助分析,纳入了接受手术治疗且未接受新辅助/辅助治疗的 I 期患者。多变量 Cox 比例风险模型用于评估组织学的独立复发危险因素,并为 3 年复发风险生成预测组织学特异性列线图。

结果

我们共纳入了 715 例 SCC 患者和 105 例 AC 患者;20%的 SCC 患者和 17%的 AC 患者复发。对于 SCC,淋巴血管间隙侵犯 (LVSI:HR 1.58,CI 1.12-2.22)、肿瘤大小 (TS≥4cm:HR 2.67,CI 1.67-4.29) 和浸润深度 (DOI;中 1/3,HR 4.31,CI 1.81-10.26;深 1/3,HR 7.05,CI 2.99-16.64) 与复发相关。对于 AC,仅 TS≥4cm 与复发相关 (HR 4.69,CI 1.25-17.63)。对于两种组织学类型,TS 和 LVSI 之间存在交互作用。对于 SCC 患者,DOI 与复发相关性最强 (16%的风险);对于 AC,TS 与阴性 LVSI 相比,阳性 LVSI 与 15%的风险相比,风险增加了 25%。

结论

目前的治疗标准基于 Sedlis 标准,特别是基于 SCC 数据得出的标准。然而,SCC 和宫颈癌的腺癌的复发危险因素不同。组织学特异性列线图准确且线性地表示 SCC 和 AC 肿瘤的复发风险,可能为临床医生提供更现代和量身定制的工具,根据患者的宫颈癌情况为其提供辅助治疗建议。

相似文献

1
Beyond Sedlis-A novel histology-specific nomogram for predicting cervical cancer recurrence risk: An NRG/GOG ancillary analysis.超越 Sedlis——一种新的组织学特异性列线图,用于预测宫颈癌复发风险:NRG/GOG 辅助分析。
Gynecol Oncol. 2021 Sep;162(3):532-538. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.06.017. Epub 2021 Jul 1.
2
Does histology influence prognosis in patients with early-stage cervical carcinoma?组织学对早期宫颈癌患者的预后有影响吗?
Cancer. 2001 Dec 15;92(12):2999-3004. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(20011215)92:12<2999::aid-cncr10145>3.0.co;2-1.
3
Impact of histological subtype on survival of patients with surgically-treated stage IA2-IIB cervical cancer: adenocarcinoma versus squamous cell carcinoma.组织学亚型对手术治疗的 IA2-IIB 期宫颈癌患者生存的影响:腺癌与鳞癌。
Gynecol Oncol. 2012 Oct;127(1):114-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.06.021. Epub 2012 Jun 21.
4
Radical hysterectomy without adjuvant radiotherapy in patients with cervix carcinoma FIGO 2009 IB1, with or without positive Sedlis criteria.FIGO 2009 IB1 期宫颈癌患者行根治性子宫切除术,不辅以辅助放疗,无论 Sedlis 标准是否阳性。
Gynecol Oncol. 2021 Sep;162(3):539-545. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.06.026. Epub 2021 Jul 10.
5
Clinical behaviors and outcomes for adenocarcinoma or adenosquamous carcinoma of cervix treated by radical hysterectomy and adjuvant radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy.根治性子宫切除术及辅助放疗或放化疗治疗宫颈腺癌或腺鳞癌的临床行为和结局。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Oct 1;84(2):420-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.12.013. Epub 2012 Feb 24.
6
Adenocarcinoma as an independent risk factor for disease recurrence in patients with stage IB cervical carcinoma.腺癌是IB期宫颈癌患者疾病复发的独立危险因素。
Gynecol Oncol. 1995 Oct;59(1):38-44. doi: 10.1006/gyno.1995.1265.
7
Postoperative nomogram for the prediction of disease-free survival in lymph node-negative stage I-IIA cervical cancer patients treated with radical hysterectomy.淋巴结阴性Ⅰ期-ⅡA 期宫颈癌根治性子宫切除术后无病生存预测的术后列线图。
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2020 Jul;40(5):699-704. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2019.1652888. Epub 2019 Oct 12.
8
Role of adjuvant therapy after radical hysterectomy in intermediate-risk, early-stage cervical cancer.根治性子宫切除术治疗中危早期宫颈癌的辅助治疗作用。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2021 Jan;31(1):52-58. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-001974. Epub 2020 Dec 10.
9
A comparison of stages IB1 and IB2 cervical cancers treated with radical hysterectomy. Is size the real difference?根治性子宫切除术治疗ⅠB1期和ⅠB2期宫颈癌的比较。大小是真正的差异所在吗?
Gynecol Oncol. 2004 Oct;95(1):70-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.07.027.
10
[Prognostic analysis of stage Ⅰb2 andⅡa2 cervical squamous cancer without high risk factors treated with neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and radical hysterectomy].[新辅助化疗联合根治性子宫切除术治疗无高危因素的Ⅰb2期和Ⅱa2期宫颈鳞癌的预后分析]
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2018 Apr 25;53(4):248-256. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-567x.2018.04.008.

引用本文的文献

1
Prognostic value of risk factors in cervical squamous cell carcinoma based on tumour infiltration depth.基于肿瘤浸润深度的宫颈鳞状细胞癌危险因素的预后价值
BMC Cancer. 2025 Sep 2;25(1):1412. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-14849-8.
2
Development and validation of prognostic prediction models for early-stage cervical cancer patients based on pathological intermediate-risk factors.基于病理中间风险因素的早期宫颈癌患者预后预测模型的开发与验证
Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2025 Jul 24;17:17588359251359461. doi: 10.1177/17588359251359461. eCollection 2025.
3
Tumor Invasion Distance Based on MRI Is a Novel Prognostic Indicator for I-IIIB Cervical Cancer Patients Treated with Radiotherapy.

本文引用的文献

1
Estimates of incidence and mortality of cervical cancer in 2018: a worldwide analysis.2018 年宫颈癌发病率和死亡率的估计:全球分析。
Lancet Glob Health. 2020 Feb;8(2):e191-e203. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30482-6. Epub 2019 Dec 4.
2
Distinctive clinicopathologic characteristics and prognosis for different histologic subtypes of early cervical cancer.不同组织学亚型早期宫颈癌的独特临床病理特征和预后。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2019 Oct;29(8):1244-1251. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2019-000556. Epub 2019 Aug 17.
3
Surgery in Cervical Cancer.
基于MRI的肿瘤浸润深度是接受放疗的I-IIIB期宫颈癌患者的一种新型预后指标。
Curr Oncol. 2025 Jun 16;32(6):355. doi: 10.3390/curroncol32060355.
4
Adjuvant Therapy in "Intermediate-Risk" Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: To Treat or Not to Treat? Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.“中危”早期宫颈癌的辅助治疗:治疗还是不治疗?系统评价与荟萃分析
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Apr 14;17(8):1320. doi: 10.3390/cancers17081320.
5
ConvXGB: A novel deep learning model to predict recurrence risk of early-stage cervical cancer following surgery using multiparametric MRI images.ConvXGB:一种使用多参数MRI图像预测早期宫颈癌术后复发风险的新型深度学习模型。
Transl Oncol. 2025 Feb;52:102281. doi: 10.1016/j.tranon.2025.102281. Epub 2025 Jan 11.
6
The Association Between D-Dimer Levels and Recurrence in Patients with Early-Stage Cervical Cancer after Surgical Treatment.D - 二聚体水平与早期宫颈癌患者手术治疗后复发之间的关联
Int J Womens Health. 2024 Dec 27;16:2333-2342. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S481692. eCollection 2024.
7
Establishment of a Novel Risk Stratification System Integrating Clinical and Pathological Parameters for Prognostication and Clinical Decision-Making in Early-Stage Cervical Cancer.建立一个新型的风险分层系统,整合临床和病理参数,用于早期宫颈癌的预后和临床决策。
Cancer Med. 2024 Nov;13(22):e70394. doi: 10.1002/cam4.70394.
8
How do we safely preserve ovaries in patients with cervical adenocarcinoma: risk factors and predictive models.我们如何安全地保留宫颈腺癌患者的卵巢:风险因素和预测模型。
Front Oncol. 2024 Oct 30;14:1464565. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1464565. eCollection 2024.
9
Contemporary Review of Adenocarcinoma of the Cervix.子宫颈腺癌的当代综述
Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2024 Dec;25(12):1538-1549. doi: 10.1007/s11864-024-01254-9. Epub 2024 Nov 13.
10
Novel use of adjuvant proton beam therapy in patient with pelvic renal transplant diagnosed with stage IB3 cervical adenocarcinoma.辅助质子束疗法在诊断为IB3期宫颈腺癌的盆腔肾移植患者中的新应用。
Gynecol Oncol Rep. 2024 Sep 29;56:101520. doi: 10.1016/j.gore.2024.101520. eCollection 2024 Dec.
子宫颈癌手术
N Engl J Med. 2018 Nov 15;379(20):1955-1957. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe1814034. Epub 2018 Oct 31.
4
Locally advanced adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous carcinomas of the cervix compared to squamous cell carcinomas of the cervix in gynecologic oncology group trials of cisplatin-based chemoradiation.在妇科肿瘤学组基于顺铂的同步放化疗试验中,宫颈局部晚期腺癌和腺鳞癌与宫颈鳞状细胞癌的比较
Gynecol Oncol. 2014 Nov;135(2):208-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.08.018. Epub 2014 Aug 23.
5
Prognostic factors for response to cisplatin-based chemotherapy in advanced cervical carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study.晚期宫颈癌对顺铂化疗反应的预后因素:一项妇科肿瘤学组研究
Gynecol Oncol. 2010 Jan;116(1):44-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.09.006. Epub 2009 Oct 22.
6
How valid are current cervical cancer prognostic factors that are used to recommend adjunctive radiation therapy after radical surgery?目前用于推荐根治性手术后辅助放疗的宫颈癌预后因素的有效性如何?
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Sep;201(3):260.e1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.04.020. Epub 2009 Jun 18.
7
Treatment of ("bulky") stage IB cervical cancer with or without neoadjuvant vincristine and cisplatin prior to radical hysterectomy and pelvic/para-aortic lymphadenectomy: a phase III trial of the gynecologic oncology group.在根治性子宫切除术和盆腔/腹主动脉旁淋巴结清扫术前,采用或不采用新辅助长春新碱和顺铂治疗“大块”IB期宫颈癌:妇科肿瘤学组的一项III期试验
Gynecol Oncol. 2007 Aug;106(2):362-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2007.04.007. Epub 2007 May 9.
8
A phase III randomized trial of postoperative pelvic irradiation in Stage IB cervical carcinoma with poor prognostic features: follow-up of a gynecologic oncology group study.一项针对具有不良预后特征的IB期宫颈癌术后盆腔放疗的III期随机试验:妇科肿瘤学组研究的随访
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006 May 1;65(1):169-76. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.10.019. Epub 2006 Jan 19.
9
Equal care ensures equal survival for African-American women with cervical carcinoma.平等的医疗护理确保患有宫颈癌的非裔美国女性有平等的生存几率。
Cancer. 2001 Feb 15;91(4):869-73.
10
Are adenocarcinomas and adenosquamous carcinomas different from squamous carcinomas in stage IB and II cervical cancer patients undergoing primary radical surgery?在接受原发性根治性手术的IB期和II期宫颈癌患者中,腺癌和腺鳞癌与鳞癌有区别吗?
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 1999 Jan;9(1):28-36. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1438.1999.09895.x.