Suppr超能文献

FIGO 2009 IB1 期宫颈癌患者行根治性子宫切除术,不辅以辅助放疗,无论 Sedlis 标准是否阳性。

Radical hysterectomy without adjuvant radiotherapy in patients with cervix carcinoma FIGO 2009 IB1, with or without positive Sedlis criteria.

机构信息

Division of Gynaecological Oncology, Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Department of Radiation-Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

出版信息

Gynecol Oncol. 2021 Sep;162(3):539-545. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.06.026. Epub 2021 Jul 10.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI), deep (>1/3) stromal invasion (DSI) and large tumor size (>4 cm) have been identified as predictors for intermediate risk for recurrence according to Sedlis (at least two of the prior risk factors) in FIGO stage I cervical cancer. Adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) has been advocated in these patients(1,2), but remains controversial.

METHOD

All consecutive patients (1997-2017) with cervical cancer FIGO (2009) stage IB1 (≤4 cm) were included. Primary aim was to analyze the recurrence rate. Secondary aim was to identify the risk factors for disease recurrence and survival.

RESULTS

One-hundred-and-eighty-two patients were included in this retrospective study. Median follow-up was 13 years (range 8-17). Postoperatively, 21 patients received adjuvant therapy due to presence of positive lymph nodes, positive section margins or if a simple hysterectomy was performed (RT: n = 7, concomitant chemo radiotherapy (CCRT): n = 14). None of the patients with a combination of intermediate risk factors according to Sedlis (excluding patients >4 cm) underwent adjuvant RT/CCRT. Disease recurrence was observed in 19 patients (10%). Eleven patients died of disease. LVSI influenced progression-free survival (PFS) (HR 3.950, p = 0.0163) and disease-specific survival (DSS) (HR 4.637, p = 0.0497) significantly. However, the combination of LVSI, tumor size and DSI according to Sedlis did not influence overall survival (OS), DSS or PFS.

CONCLUSION

Recurrence rate was low (10%), despite the fact that patients with intermediate risk factors according to Sedlis did not receive postoperative RT/CCRT. LVSI was the sole risk factor influencing PFS and DSS. Combinations of risk factors according to Sedlis did not predict worse outcome.

摘要

介绍

淋巴血管空间侵犯(LVSI)、深层(>1/3)间质浸润(DSI)和大肿瘤尺寸(>4cm)已被确定为 Sedlis 标准中 FIGO 分期 I 期宫颈癌复发的中危预测因素(至少存在上述两个高危因素)。(1,2)在这些患者中主张辅助放疗(RT),但仍存在争议。

方法

所有连续的宫颈癌 FIGO(2009)IB1 期(≤4cm)患者(1997-2017 年)均纳入本回顾性研究。主要目的是分析复发率。次要目的是确定疾病复发和生存的危险因素。

结果

本研究共纳入 182 例患者。中位随访时间为 13 年(8-17 年)。术后,由于存在阳性淋巴结、阳性切片边缘或单纯子宫切除术,21 例患者接受了辅助治疗(RT:n=7,同期放化疗(CCRT):n=14)。没有 Sedlis 标准中存在中危因素的患者(不包括>4cm 的患者)接受了辅助 RT/CCRT。19 例患者(10%)出现疾病复发。11 例患者死于疾病。LVSI 显著影响无进展生存(PFS)(HR 3.950,p=0.0163)和疾病特异性生存(DSS)(HR 4.637,p=0.0497)。然而,Sedlis 标准中的 LVSI、肿瘤大小和 DSI 组合并未影响总生存(OS)、DSS 或 PFS。

结论

尽管 Sedlis 标准中有中危因素的患者未接受术后 RT/CCRT,但复发率仍较低(10%)。LVSI 是唯一影响 PFS 和 DSS 的危险因素。Sedlis 标准中的风险因素组合并不能预测更差的结局。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验