• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经脐后腹膜腰椎椎间融合术:技术说明及初步病例系列

Transumbilical Retroperitoneal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Technical Note and Preliminary Case Series.

作者信息

Bae Junseok, Kim Shin-Jae, Lee Sang-Ho, Bae Youngsik, Jeon Sang Hyeop

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Chungdam Wooridul Spine Hospital, Seoul, Korea.

Department of General Surgery, Chungdam Wooridul Spine Hospital, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Neurospine. 2021 Jun;18(2):399-405. doi: 10.14245/ns.2040640.320. Epub 2021 Jun 30.

DOI:10.14245/ns.2040640.320
PMID:34218622
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8255768/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) has advantages over posterior lumbar interbody fusion or transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion techniques in that it minimizes damage to the anatomical structure of the posterior spinal segment and enables indirect decompression of the foramen by insertion of a tall cage. However, the predominant abdominal scar tissue reduces patients' satisfaction after ALIF. Herein, we describe the technique of transumbilical lumbar interbody fusion (TULIF) and its preliminary results in a case series.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 154 consecutive patients who underwent TULIF between the L2-3 and L4-5 levels was performed. After preoperatively selecting patients by evaluating the location of the umbilicus and vessel anatomy, a vertical skin incision was made on the umbilicus to minimize the abdominal scar tissue.

RESULTS

There were 120 single-level (110 L4-5 and 10 L3-4), 31 two-level, and 3 three-level surgeries. All patients were very satisfied with their postoperative abdominal scars, which were noticeably faint compared to those after conventional ALIF.

CONCLUSION

TULIF is a feasible, minimally invasive surgical option that can achieve both the treatment of degenerative spinal disease and satisfactory cosmesis. Although it is technically demanding, patients obtain sufficient benefits.

摘要

目的

腰椎前路椎间融合术(ALIF)相较于腰椎后路椎间融合术或经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术具有优势,因为它能将对脊柱后段解剖结构的损伤降至最低,并通过植入高椎间融合器实现椎间孔的间接减压。然而,主要的腹部瘢痕组织会降低患者接受ALIF后的满意度。在此,我们描述经脐腰椎椎间融合术(TULIF)技术及其在一系列病例中的初步结果。

方法

对154例连续接受L2 - 3至L4 - 5节段TULIF手术的患者进行回顾性研究。术前通过评估脐部位置和血管解剖结构选择患者后,在脐部做垂直皮肤切口以尽量减少腹部瘢痕组织。

结果

有120例单节段手术(110例L4 - 5和10例L3 - 4),31例双节段手术和3例三节段手术。所有患者对术后腹部瘢痕都非常满意,与传统ALIF术后的瘢痕相比明显更淡。

结论

TULIF是一种可行的微创手术选择,既能治疗退行性脊柱疾病,又能实现令人满意的美容效果。尽管该技术要求较高,但患者能获得足够的益处。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91f5/8255768/c280c330e44f/ns-2040640-320f8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91f5/8255768/15b7f2ca0611/ns-2040640-320f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91f5/8255768/3b8597e7d8e7/ns-2040640-320f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91f5/8255768/4afe1fcac9b1/ns-2040640-320f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91f5/8255768/01484f455249/ns-2040640-320f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91f5/8255768/22edf0c4b89b/ns-2040640-320f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91f5/8255768/65aabf12d28a/ns-2040640-320f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91f5/8255768/1a1165355750/ns-2040640-320f7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91f5/8255768/c280c330e44f/ns-2040640-320f8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91f5/8255768/15b7f2ca0611/ns-2040640-320f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91f5/8255768/3b8597e7d8e7/ns-2040640-320f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91f5/8255768/4afe1fcac9b1/ns-2040640-320f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91f5/8255768/01484f455249/ns-2040640-320f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91f5/8255768/22edf0c4b89b/ns-2040640-320f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91f5/8255768/65aabf12d28a/ns-2040640-320f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91f5/8255768/1a1165355750/ns-2040640-320f7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91f5/8255768/c280c330e44f/ns-2040640-320f8.jpg

相似文献

1
Transumbilical Retroperitoneal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Technical Note and Preliminary Case Series.经脐后腹膜腰椎椎间融合术:技术说明及初步病例系列
Neurospine. 2021 Jun;18(2):399-405. doi: 10.14245/ns.2040640.320. Epub 2021 Jun 30.
2
A new microsurgical technique for minimally invasive anterior lumbar interbody fusion.一种用于微创前路腰椎椎间融合术的新显微外科技术。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997 Mar 15;22(6):691-9; discussion 700. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199703150-00023.
3
Facet Joint Fixation and Anterior, Direct Lateral, and Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusions for Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Disc Diseases: Retrospective Cohort Study of a New Minimally Invasive Technique.关节突关节固定与前路、直接侧方和经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术治疗退行性腰椎间盘疾病:一种新的微创技术的回顾性队列研究。
World Neurosurg. 2018 Jun;114:e959-e968. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.03.121. Epub 2018 Mar 26.
4
Preliminary results of anterior lumbar interbody fusion, anterior column realignment for the treatment of sagittal malalignment.前路腰椎椎体间融合术、前柱矫正治疗矢状面失平衡的初步结果。
Neurosurg Focus. 2017 Dec;43(6):E6. doi: 10.3171/2017.8.FOCUS17423.
5
Minimally invasive lateral interbody fusion for the treatment of rostral adjacent-segment lumbar degenerative stenosis without supplemental pedicle screw fixation.微创外侧椎间融合术治疗无附加椎弓根螺钉固定的上位相邻节段腰椎退变性狭窄症
J Neurosurg Spine. 2014 Dec;21(6):861-6. doi: 10.3171/2014.8.SPINE13841. Epub 2014 Oct 10.
6
Comparison of Outcomes of Anterior, Posterior, and Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery at a Single Lumbar Level with Degenerative Spinal Disease.单节段腰椎退变疾病行前路、后路及经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术的疗效比较
World Neurosurg. 2017 May;101:216-226. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.01.114. Epub 2017 Feb 9.
7
Comparison of open and minimally invasive techniques for posterior lumbar instrumentation and fusion after open anterior lumbar interbody fusion.比较经前路腰椎体间融合术后行后路腰椎内固定融合时的开放与微创技术。
Spine J. 2013 May;13(5):489-97. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.10.034. Epub 2012 Dec 5.
8
Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: the effect of various instrumentation techniques on the flexibility of the lumbar spine.经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术:各种内固定技术对腰椎灵活性的影响。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Feb 15;29(4):E65-70. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000113034.74567.86.
9
Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion With Cage Retrieval for the Treatment of Pseudarthrosis After Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Single-Institution Case Series.经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术后采用 cage 取出术治疗假关节:单中心病例系列研究。
Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2021 Jan 13;20(2):164-173. doi: 10.1093/ons/opaa303.
10
Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus anterior lumbar interbody fusion as an adjunct to posterior instrumented correction of degenerative lumbar scoliosis: three year clinical and radiographic outcomes.经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术与前路腰椎椎体间融合术作为退行性腰椎侧弯后路器械矫正辅助手段的比较:三年临床及影像学结果
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Sep 15;34(20):2126-33. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b612db.

引用本文的文献

1
Fusion Assessment of Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Demineralized Bone Matrix: A 2-Year Prospective Study.使用脱矿骨基质对斜外侧腰椎椎间融合术进行融合评估:一项为期2年的前瞻性研究。
Neurospine. 2023 Dec;20(4):1205-1216. doi: 10.14245/ns.2347032.516. Epub 2023 Dec 31.
2
Commentary on "Perioperative Clinical Features and Long-term Prognosis After Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion (OLIF), OLIF With Anterolateral Screw Fixation, or OLIF With Percutaneous Pedicle Fixation: A Comprehensive Treatment Strategy for Patients With Lumbar Degenerative Disease".关于“斜外侧椎间融合术(OLIF)、前路外侧螺钉固定OLIF或经皮椎弓根固定OLIF治疗腰椎退行性疾病患者的围手术期临床特征及长期预后:一种综合治疗策略”的述评
Neurospine. 2023 Jun;20(2):550-552. doi: 10.14245/ns.2346608.304. Epub 2023 Jun 30.

本文引用的文献

1
A new "keyhole" approach for multilevel anterior lumbar interbody fusion: the perinavel approach-technical note and literature review.一种用于多节段腰椎前路椎间融合术的新型“锁孔”入路:经脐周入路——技术说明与文献综述
Eur Spine J. 2018 Aug;27(8):1956-1963. doi: 10.1007/s00586-018-5659-0. Epub 2018 Jun 9.
2
Lumbar interbody fusion: techniques, indications and comparison of interbody fusion options including PLIF, TLIF, MI-TLIF, OLIF/ATP, LLIF and ALIF.腰椎椎间融合术:技术、适应证以及椎间融合选择的比较,包括后路腰椎椎间融合术(PLIF)、经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术(TLIF)、改良经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术(MI-TLIF)、斜外侧腰椎椎间融合术/前斜外侧腰椎椎间融合术(OLIF/ATP)、侧方腰椎椎间融合术(LLIF)和前路腰椎椎间融合术(ALIF)
J Spine Surg. 2015 Dec;1(1):2-18. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2414-469X.2015.10.05.
3
Clinical and radiological outcomes of a new cage for direct lateral lumbar interbody fusion.
Korean J Spine. 2014 Sep;11(3):145-51. doi: 10.14245/kjs.2014.11.3.145. Epub 2014 Sep 30.
4
Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: the future of gastrointestinal surgery.经自然腔道内镜手术:胃肠外科的未来
Perm J. 2008 Spring;12(2):42-7. doi: 10.7812/TPP/07-119.
5
Comparison study of the instrumented circumferential fusion with instrumented anterior lumbar interbody fusion as a surgical procedure for adult low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis.后路器械性融合与前路腰椎间融合术治疗成人低度峡部裂性脊柱滑脱的对比研究。
World Neurosurg. 2010 May;73(5):565-71. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2010.02.057.
6
Two-level anterior lumbar interbody fusion with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation: a minimum 3-year follow-up study.经皮椎弓根螺钉固定的两级前路腰椎椎间融合术:至少3年的随访研究
Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2010;50(8):645-50. doi: 10.2176/nmc.50.645.
7
Minimally invasive anterior lumbar interbody fusion followed by percutaneous pedicle screw fixation for isthmic spondylolisthesis: minimum 5-year follow-up.微创前路腰椎体间融合联合经皮椎弓根螺钉固定治疗峡部裂性腰椎滑脱:至少 5 年随访。
Spine J. 2010 May;10(5):404-9. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2010.02.022.
8
Minimally invasive spine technology and minimally invasive spine surgery: a historical review.微创脊柱技术与微创脊柱手术:历史回顾
Neurosurg Focus. 2009 Sep;27(3):E9. doi: 10.3171/2009.7.FOCUS09121.
9
Single-incision laparoscopic trans-abdominal pre-peritoneal mesh hernia repair: a feasible approach.单切口经腹腹膜前网片修补术治疗腹股沟疝:一种可行的方法。
Hernia. 2010 Jun;14(3):329-31. doi: 10.1007/s10029-009-0550-x. Epub 2009 Aug 26.
10
Mini-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus anterior lumbar interbody fusion augmented by percutaneous pedicle screw fixation: a comparison of surgical outcomes in adult low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis.微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术与经皮椎弓根螺钉固定增强的前路腰椎椎间融合术:成人低度峡部裂型腰椎滑脱手术疗效比较
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2009 Apr;22(2):114-21. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e318169bff5.