Suppr超能文献

异体骨联合富血小板血浆在腭裂缺损牙槽骨植骨中的应用。

Allogeneic Bone Application in Association with Platelet-Rich Plasma for Alveolar Bone Grafting of Cleft Palate Defects.

作者信息

Ferreira Cimara Fortes, Carlini João Luiz, Magini Ricardo de Souza, Gil José Nazareno, Zétola André Luis

机构信息

Associate Professor of the Department of Periodontology - University of Tennessee Health Sciences College of Dentistry, Memphis, TN, USA.

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Comprehensive Care Center for Cleft Lip and Palate (CCCLP) of Paraná, Federal University of Paraná, Paraná, Brazil.

出版信息

Contemp Clin Dent. 2021 Apr-Jun;12(2):143-149. doi: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_342_20. Epub 2021 Jun 14.

Abstract

AIM

The aim of this study is to compare allogeneic bone grafts associated with platelet-rich plasma (ALBGs-PRP) to autogenous bone grafts (ATBGs) for alveolar reconstructions in patients with cleft lip and palate (CLP).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The Maxillofacial Surgery Service of the Comprehensive Care Center for CLP (CCCLP) in Curitiba (Paraná, Brazil).

PATIENTS

Thirty out of 46 patients with 8-12 years of age and pre- or trans-foramen unilateral clefts were operated by the same surgeon. Groups were selected randomly after coin-toss for the first surgery to be ALBG-PRP.

INTERVENTIONS

Pre- and post-surgery cleft defect severity was registered by a score system using superimposed digitalized peri-apical radiographs. The hypothesis indicated ABG-PRP to be similar to the ABG was proved.

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant difference ( < 0.05) in bone augmentation for the ABG-PRP group (79.88%) when compared to the ABG group (79.9%).

CONCLUSION

ABG-PRP is indicated as a successful treatment modality to reduce the need for additional donor sites and reduce morbidity and hospital stay.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较富含血小板血浆的同种异体骨移植(ALBGs-PRP)与自体骨移植(ATBGs)用于唇腭裂(CLP)患者牙槽骨重建的效果。

材料与方法

巴西巴拉那州库里蒂巴唇腭裂综合护理中心(CCCLP)的颌面外科服务部门。

患者

46例8至12岁、患有单侧术前或经孔腭裂的患者中有30例由同一位外科医生进行手术。首次手术通过抛硬币随机分组,一组为ALBG-PRP。

干预措施

使用叠加数字化根尖片的评分系统记录手术前后腭裂缺损的严重程度。结果表明ABG-PRP与ABG相似的假设得到证实。

结果

与ABG组(79.9%)相比,ABG-PRP组的骨增量(79.88%)无统计学显著差异(<0.05)。

结论

ABG-PRP被认为是一种成功的治疗方式,可减少对额外供区的需求,降低发病率和缩短住院时间。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c533/8237810/c4d4394ee017/CCD-12-143-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验