Hazari Vibhor, Choudhary Anushree, Mishra Rohit, Chandrashekar Kabbur Thipanna, Trivedi Ashima, Pathak Pranshu Kumar
Department of Periodontics and Implantology, Hitkarini Dental College and Hospital, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, B. R. D. Medical College, Gorakhpur, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Contemp Clin Dent. 2021 Apr-Jun;12(2):150-156. doi: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_101_20. Epub 2021 Jun 14.
Periodontal regeneration remains one of the crucial issues in the field of periodontology. Periodontal intrabony defects could be treated by surgical intervention through various alloplastic bone graft substitutes. The Food and Drug Administration approved, Novabone putty is one of the recently marketed bone graft substitutes, which has been used in the present study. This study also incorporates the placement of platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) in combination with Novabone putty.
Twenty patients were included in the study and were allocated to either Group A or Group B through randomization. Group A included the placement of Novabone putty in the periodontal intrabony defects, whereas Group B included the placement of Novabone putty along with PRF. Statistical analysis of plaque index, gingival index, probing pocket depth, relative attachment level, and intraoral periapical radiographs was performed.
Statistical more significant difference ( < 0.05) in probing pocket depth, and relative attachment level was observed in Group B (Novabone putty and PRF) in comparison to Group A (Novabone putty).
Evaluation of efficacy of Novabone putty along with PRF produced more favorable results in relative attachment level gain and more reduction in probing pocket depth when compared to Novabone putty alone.
牙周组织再生仍然是牙周病学领域的关键问题之一。牙周骨内缺损可通过各种异体骨移植替代物进行手术干预治疗。美国食品药品监督管理局批准的Novabone骨泥是最近上市的骨移植替代物之一,本研究中使用了该产品。本研究还纳入了富血小板纤维蛋白(PRF)与Novabone骨泥联合应用。
本研究纳入20例患者,通过随机分组分为A组或B组。A组在牙周骨内缺损处植入Novabone骨泥,而B组在植入Novabone骨泥的同时植入PRF。对菌斑指数、牙龈指数、探诊深度、相对附着水平和口腔内根尖片进行统计学分析。
与A组(Novabone骨泥)相比,B组(Novabone骨泥和PRF)在探诊深度和相对附着水平上有统计学意义上更显著的差异(<0.05)。
与单独使用Novabone骨泥相比,评估Novabone骨泥与PRF联合应用在相对附着水平增加和探诊深度减少方面产生了更有利的结果。