Leroux Pierre, De Ruffi Sébastien, Ramont Laurent, Gornet Marion, Giordano Orsini Guillaume, Losset Xavier, Kanagaratnam Lukshe, Gennai Stéphane
Emergency Department, Reims University Hospital, 45 Rue Cognacq-Jay, Reims 51100, France.
Biochemistry Department, Reims University Hospital, 45 Rue Cognacq-Jay, Reims 51100, France.
Emerg Med Int. 2021 Jun 10;2021:2344212. doi: 10.1155/2021/2344212. eCollection 2021.
Procalcitonin (PCT) may be useful for early risk stratification in the emergency department (ED), but the transposition of published data to routine emergency practice is sometimes limited. An observational retrospective study was conducted in the adult ED of the Reims University Hospital (France). Over one year, 852 patients suspected of infection were included, of mean age 61.7 years (SD: 22.6), and 624 (73.2%) were hospitalized following ED visit. Overall, 82 (9.6%) patients died during their hospitalization with an odds ratio (OR) of 5.10 (95% CI: 2.19-11.87) for PCT ≥ 0.5, in multivariate logistic regression analyses. Moreover, 78 (9.2%) patients were admitted to an ICU, 74 (8.7%) had attributable bacteremia, and 56 (6.6%) evolved toward septic shock with an OR of 4.37 (2.08-9.16), 6.38 (2.67-15.24), and 6.38 (2.41-16.86), respectively, for PCT ≥ 0.5. The highest discriminatory values were found for patients with age <65 years, but PCT lost its discrimination power for in-hospital mortality in patients with a bronchopulmonary infection site or a temperature ≥37.8°C and for ICU admission in patients with severe clinical presentations. PCT could be helpful in risk stratification, but several limitations must be considered, including being sometimes outperformed by a simple clinical examination.
降钙素原(PCT)可能有助于急诊科(ED)的早期风险分层,但已发表数据在常规急诊实践中的应用有时会受到限制。在法国兰斯大学医院的成人急诊科进行了一项观察性回顾性研究。在一年多的时间里,纳入了852例疑似感染患者,平均年龄61.7岁(标准差:22.6),624例(73.2%)在急诊科就诊后住院。总体而言,82例(9.6%)患者在住院期间死亡,在多因素逻辑回归分析中,PCT≥0.5的患者的比值比(OR)为5.10(95%可信区间:2.19-11.87)。此外,78例(9.2%)患者入住重症监护病房(ICU),74例(8.7%)发生菌血症,56例(6.6%)发展为感染性休克,PCT≥0.5的患者的OR分别为4.37(2.08-9.16)、6.38(2.67-15.24)和6.38(2.41-16.86)。年龄<65岁的患者的鉴别价值最高,但对于支气管肺部感染部位或体温≥37.8°C的患者,PCT在预测院内死亡率方面失去了鉴别能力,对于临床表现严重的患者,PCT在预测ICU入住方面也失去了鉴别能力。PCT可能有助于风险分层,但必须考虑到一些局限性,包括有时简单的临床检查比PCT更有效。