Raju Rachel, Sahu Arvind, Klevansky Myron, Torres Javier
Department of Oncology, Goulburn Valley Health, Shepparton, VIC, Australia.
Department of Rural Health, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Shepparton, VIC, Australia.
Front Oncol. 2021 Jun 18;11:656146. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.656146. eCollection 2021.
Both abiraterone and enzalutamide have shown to improve overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) regardless of previous treatment with chemotherapy (COU-AA301, COU-AA302, AFFIRM and PREVAIL). The data regarding the impact of these treatments in the real world setting is scarce. This study assessed the real world survival and disease outcomes in mCRPC patients in a regional health service in Victoria with the use of abiraterone and enzalutamide.
This retrospective clinical audit included 75 patients with diagnosis of mCRPC treated with either abiraterone or enzalutamide between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2019, at Goulburn Valley Health. Patients were stratified according to the drug received, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, Gleason score, burden of disease at diagnosis, presence of visceral metastases and use of previous chemotherapy. The primary end point was PSA response (defined as a reduction in the PSA level from baseline by 50% or more). The secondary outcomes were PSA PFS, radiographic PFS, and OS.
Thirty-seven patients received enzalutamide, and the other 38 received abiraterone. Only 20% of patients in either group had visceral metastases. 32% of patients receiving enzalutamide had a high burden of disease, compared to 53% receiving abiraterone. 38% of patients in the enzalutamide group and 53% in the abiraterone group had received prior chemotherapy. PSA response rates were higher in the enzalutamide group than abiraterone group (70.3% vs 37.8%). Both PSA and radiographic PFS were longer in the enzalutamide group than abiraterone group; 7 months vs 5 months for both end points. OS was also found to be longer in patients receiving enzalutamide; 30 months compared to only 13 months in patients receiving abiraterone.
Both abiraterone and enzalutamide have shown to result in significant PSA response rates, as well as PFS and OS benefit in mCRPC patients in the real world setting. The difference in responses and survival benefit are probably impacted by the unbalanced burden of disease.
阿比特龙和恩杂鲁胺均已显示可改善转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌(mCRPC)患者的总生存期(OS)、无进展生存期(PFS)和前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)反应,无论先前是否接受过化疗(COU - AA301、COU - AA302、AFFIRM和PREVAIL)。关于这些治疗在现实环境中的影响的数据很少。本研究评估了在维多利亚州一家地区卫生服务机构中使用阿比特龙和恩杂鲁胺的mCRPC患者的实际生存情况和疾病转归。
这项回顾性临床审计纳入了2014年1月1日至2019年12月31日期间在古尔本山谷健康中心接受阿比特龙或恩杂鲁胺治疗的75例mCRPC诊断患者。患者根据所接受的药物、东部肿瘤协作组(ECOG)体能状态、 Gleason评分、诊断时的疾病负担、内脏转移情况以及先前化疗的使用情况进行分层。主要终点是PSA反应(定义为PSA水平从基线降低50%或更多)。次要结局是PSA无进展生存期、影像学无进展生存期和总生存期。
37例患者接受了恩杂鲁胺,另外38例接受了阿比特龙。两组中只有20%的患者有内脏转移。接受恩杂鲁胺的患者中有32%疾病负担高,而接受阿比特龙的患者中这一比例为53%。恩杂鲁胺组38%的患者和阿比特龙组53%的患者接受过先前的化疗。恩杂鲁胺组的PSA反应率高于阿比特龙组(70.3%对37.8%)。恩杂鲁胺组的PSA和影像学无进展生存期均长于阿比特龙组;两个终点均为7个月对5个月。接受恩杂鲁胺的患者总生存期也更长;为30个月,而接受阿比特龙的患者仅为13个月。
在现实环境中,阿比特龙和恩杂鲁胺均已显示可使mCRPC患者产生显著的PSA反应率,并带来PFS和OS获益。反应和生存获益的差异可能受疾病负担不平衡的影响。