• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

髓内钉治疗胫骨骨干骨折后再次手术的中心量、外科医生量、外科医生经验和地理位置的影响。

Impact of centre volume, surgeon volume, surgeon experience and geographic location on reoperation after intramedullary nailing of tibial shaft fractures.

机构信息

From the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minn. (Swiontkowski); the Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Okla. (Teague); the Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont. (Sprague, Heels-Ansdell, Bhandari, Walter); the Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont. (Sprague, Bzovsky, Bhandari); the Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, London Health Sciences Centre and Western University, London, Ont. (Schemitsch, Sanders); and the Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Mass. (Tornetta).

London Health Sciences Centre/University of Western Ontario: David W. Sanders, Mark D. Macleod, Timothy Carey, Kellie Leitch, Stuart Bailey, Kevin Gurr, Ken Konito, Charlene Bartha, Isolina Low, Leila V. MacBean, Mala Ramu, Susan Reiber, Ruth Strapp, Christina Tieszer; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre/University of Toronto: Hans Kreder, David J.G. Stephen, Terry S. Axelrod, Albert J.M. Yee, Robin R. Richards, Joel Finkelstein, Richard M. Holtby, Hugh Cameron, John Cameron, Wade Gofton, John Murnaghan, Joseph Schatztker, Beverly Bulmer, Lisa Conlan; Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal: Yves Laflamme, Gregory Berry, Pierre Beaumont, Pierre Ranger, Georges-Henri Laflamme, Alain Jodoin, Eric Renaud, Sylvain Gagnon, Gilles Maurais, Michel Malo, Julio Fernandes, Kim Latendresse, Marie-France Poirier, Gina Daigneault; St. Michael’s Hospital/University of Toronto: Emil H. Schemitsch, Michael M. McKee, James P. Waddell, Earl R. Bogoch, Timothy R. Daniels, Robert R. McBroom, Robin R. Richards, Milena R. Vicente, Wendy Storey, Lisa M. Wild; Royal Columbian Hospital/University of British Columbia, Vancouver: Robert McCormack, Bertrand Perey, Thomas J. Goetz, Graham Pate, Murray J. Penner, Kostas Panagiotopoulos, Shafique Pirani, Ian G. Dommisse, Richard L. Loomer, Trevor Stone, Karyn Moon, Mauri Zomar; Wake Forest Medical Center/Wake Forest University Health Sciences, Winston-Salem, NC: Lawrence X. Webb, Robert D. Teasdall, John Peter Birkedal, David F. Martin, David S. Ruch, Douglas J. Kilgus, David C. Pollock, Mitchel Brion Harris, Ethan R. Wiesler, William G. Ward, Jeffrey Scott Shilt, Andrew L. Koman, Gary G. Poehling, Brenda Kulp; Boston Medical Center/Boston University School of Medicine: Paul Tornetta III, William R. Creevy, Andrew B. Stein, Christopher T. Bono, Thomas A. Einhorn, T. Desmond Brown, Donna Pacicca, John B. Sledge III, Timothy E. Foster, Ilva Voloshin, Jill Bolton, Hope Carlisle, Lisa Shaughnessy; Wake Medical Center, Raleigh, NC: William T. Ombremsky, C. Michael LeCroy, Eric G. Meinberg, Terry M. Messer, William L. Craig III, Douglas R. Dirschl, Robert Caudle, Tim Harris, Kurt Elhert, William Hage, Robert Jones, Luis Piedrahita, Paul O. Schricker, Robin Driver, Jean Godwin, Gloria Hansley; Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn.: William T. Obremskey, Philip J. Kregor, Gregory Tennent, Lisa M. Truchan, Marcus Sciadini, Franklin D. Shuler, Robin E. Driver, Mary Alice Nading, Jacky Neiderstadt, Alexander R. Vap; MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland: Heather A. Vallier, Brendan M. Patterson, John H. Wilber, Roger G. Wilber, John K. Sontich, Timothy A. Moore, Drew Brady, Daniel R. Cooperman, John A. Davis, Beth Ann Cureton; Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ont.: Scott Mandel, R. Douglas Orr, John T.S. Sadler, Tousief Hussain, Krishan Rajaratnam, Bradley Petrisor, Mohit Bhandari, Brian Drew, Drew A. Bednar, Desmond C.H. Kwok, Shirley Pettit, Jill Hancock, Natalie Sidorkewicz; Regions Hospital, Saint Paul, Minn.: Peter A. Cole, Joel J. Smith, Gregory A. Brown, Thomas A. Lange, John G. Stark, Bruce Levy, Marc Swiontkowski, Julie Agel, Mary J. Garaghty, Joshua G. Salzman, Carol A. Schutte, Linda (Toddie) Tastad, Sandy Vang; University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, Ky.: David Seligson, Craig S. Roberts, Arthur L. Malkani, Laura Sanders, Sharon Allen Gregory, Carmen Dyer, Jessica Heinsen, Langan Smith, Sudhakar Madanagopal; Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston: Kevin J. Coupe, Jeffrey J. Tucker, Allen R. Criswell, Rosemary Buckle, Alan Jeffrey Rechter, Dhiren Shaskikant Sheth, Brad Urquart, Thea Trotscher; Erie County Medical Center/University of Buffalo, Buffalo, NY: Mark J. Anders, Joseph M. Kowalski, Marc S. Fineberg, Lawrence B. Bone, Matthew J. Phillips, Bernard Rohrbacher, Philip Stegemann, William M. Mihalko, Cathy Buyea; University of Florida – Jacksonville: Stephen J. Augustine, William Thomas Jackson, Gregory Solis, Sunday U. Ero, Daniel N. Segina, Hudson B. Berrey, Samuel G. Agnew, Michael Fitzpatrick, Lakina C. Campbell, Lynn Derting, June McAdams; Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam: J. Carel Goslings, Kees Jan Ponsen, Jan Luitse, Peter Kloen, Pieter Joosse, Jasper Winkelhagen, Raphaël Duivenvoorden; University of Oklahoma Health Science Center, Oklahoma City: David C. Teague, Joseph Davey, J. Andy Sullivan, William J.J. Ertl, Timothy A. Puckett, Charles B. Pasque, John F. Tompkins II, Curtis R. Gruel, Paul Kammerlocher, Thomas P. Lehman, William R. Puffinbarger, Kathy L. Carl; University of Alberta/University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton: Donald W. Weber, Nadr M. Jomha, Gordon R. Goplen, Edward Masson, Lauren A. Beaupre, Karen E. Greaves, Lori N. Schaump; Greenville Hospital System, Greenville, SC: Kyle J. Jeray, David R. Goetz, Davd E. Westberry, J. Scott Broderick, Bryan S. Moon, Stephanie L. Tanner; Foothills General Hospital, Calgary: James N. Powell, Richard E. Buckley, Leslie Elves; Saint John Regional Hospital, Saint John, NB: Stephen Connolly, Edward P. Abraham, Donna Eastwood, Trudy Steele; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland: Thomas Ellis, Alex Herzberg, George A. Brown, Dennis E. Crawford, Robert Hart, James Hayden, Robert M. Orfaly, Theodore Vigland, Maharani Vivekaraj, Gina L. Bundy; San Francisco General Hospital: Theodore Miclau III, Amir Matityahu, R. Richard Coughlin, Utku Kandemir, R. Trigg McClellan, Cindy Hsin-Hua Lin; Detroit Receiving Hospital: David Karges, Kathryn Cramer, J. Tracy Watson, Berton Moed, Barbara Scott; Deaconess Hospital Regional Trauma Center and Orthopaedic Associates, Evansville, Ind.: Dennis J. Beck, Carolyn Orth; Thunder Bay Regional Health Sciences Centre, Thunder Bay, Ont.: David Puskas, Russell Clark, Jennifer Jones; Jamaica Hospital, Jamaica, NY: Kenneth A. Egol, Nader Paksima, Monet France; Ottawa Hospital – Civic Campus: Eugene K. Wai, Garth Johnson, Ross Wilkinson, Adam T. Gruszczynski, Liisa Vexler.

出版信息

Can J Surg. 2021 Jul 5;64(4):E371-E376. doi: 10.1503/cjs.004020.

DOI:10.1503/cjs.004020
PMID:34222771
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8410470/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Tibial shaft fractures are the most common long-bone injury, with a reported annual incidence of more than 75 000 in the United States. This study aimed to determine whether patients with tibial fractures managed with intramedullary nails experience a lower rate of reoperation if treated at higher-volume hospitals, or by higher-volume or more experienced surgeons.

METHODS

The Study to Prospectively Evaluate Reamed Intramedullary Nails in Patients with Tibial Fractures (SPRINT) was a multicentre randomized clinical trial comparing reamed and nonreamed intramedullary nailing on rates of reoperation to promote fracture union, treat infection or preserve the limb in patients with open and closed fractures of the tibial shaft. Using data from SPRINT, we quantified centre and surgeon volumes into quintiles. We performed analyses adjusted for type of fracture (open v. closed), type of injury (isolated v. multitrauma), gender and age for the primary outcome of reoperation using multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in the odds of reoperation between high- and low-volume centres (p = 0.9). Overall, surgeon volume significantly affected the odds of reoperation (p = 0.03). The odds of reoperation among patients treated by moderate-volume surgeons were 50% less than those among patients treated by verylow-volume surgeons (odds ratio [OR] 0.50, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.28–0.88), and the odds of reoperation among patients treated by high-volume surgeons were 47% less than those among patients treated by very-low-volume surgeons (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.30–0.93).

CONCLUSION

There appears to be no significant additional patient benefit in treatment by a higher-volume centre for intramedullary fixation of tibial shaft fractures. Additional research on the effects of surgical and clinical site volume in tibial shaft fracture management is needed to confirm this finding. The odds of reoperation were higher in patients treated by very-low-volume surgeons; this finding may be used to optimize the results of tibial shaft fracture management. Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00038129

摘要

背景

胫骨骨折是最常见的长骨损伤,据报道,在美国每年的发病率超过 75000 例。本研究旨在确定接受髓内钉治疗的胫骨骨折患者,如果在高容量医院或由高容量或更有经验的外科医生治疗,是否会降低再次手术的发生率。

方法

前瞻性评估胫骨骨折患者扩髓髓内钉治疗(SPRINT)研究是一项多中心随机临床试验,比较扩髓和非扩髓髓内钉治疗胫骨骨干开放性和闭合性骨折患者骨折愈合、治疗感染或保留肢体的再手术率。利用 SPRINT 数据,我们将中心和外科医生的数量分为五组。我们使用多变量逻辑回归分析,对骨折类型(开放性与闭合性)、损伤类型(单一创伤与多发创伤)、性别和年龄进行调整,分析主要转归再手术的概率。

结果

高容量和低容量中心之间再手术的几率没有显著差异(p = 0.9)。总体而言,外科医生的数量显著影响再手术的几率(p = 0.03)。与超低容量外科医生治疗的患者相比,中等容量外科医生治疗的患者再手术的几率降低了 50%(比值比 [OR] 0.50,95%置信区间 [CI] 0.28-0.88),高容量外科医生治疗的患者再手术的几率降低了 47%(OR 0.53,95% CI 0.30-0.93)。

结论

对于胫骨骨干骨折的髓内固定治疗,在高容量中心治疗似乎没有显著增加患者的获益。需要进一步研究手术和临床部位数量对胫骨骨折管理的影响,以证实这一发现。接受超低容量外科医生治疗的患者再手术的几率较高;这一发现可用于优化胫骨骨折管理的结果。临床试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov,NCT00038129

相似文献

1
Impact of centre volume, surgeon volume, surgeon experience and geographic location on reoperation after intramedullary nailing of tibial shaft fractures.髓内钉治疗胫骨骨干骨折后再次手术的中心量、外科医生量、外科医生经验和地理位置的影响。
Can J Surg. 2021 Jul 5;64(4):E371-E376. doi: 10.1503/cjs.004020.
2
Study to prospectively evaluate reamed intramedually nails in patients with tibial fractures (S.P.R.I.N.T.): study rationale and design.胫骨骨折患者扩髓髓内钉前瞻性评估研究(S.P.R.I.N.T.):研究原理与设计
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2008 Jun 23;9:91. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-9-91.
3
Intramedullary nailing for tibial shaft fractures in adults.成人胫骨干骨折的髓内钉固定术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jan 18;1(1):CD008241. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008241.pub2.
4
Current practice in the intramedullary nailing of tibial shaft fractures: an international survey.胫骨干骨折髓内钉固定的当前实践:一项国际调查。
J Trauma. 2002 Oct;53(4):725-32. doi: 10.1097/00005373-200210000-00018.
5
Reamed compared with unreamed nailing of tibial shaft fractures: Does the initial method of nail insertion influence outcome in patients requiring reoperations?扩髓与非扩髓交锁髓内钉治疗胫骨骨干骨折的比较:初次置钉方法是否影响需要再次手术患者的结局?
Can J Surg. 2023 Jul 13;66(4):E384-E389. doi: 10.1503/cjs.012222. Print 2023 Jul-Aug.
6
Economic evaluation of reamed versus unreamed intramedullary nailing in patients with closed and open tibial fractures: results from the study to prospectively evaluate reamed intramedullary nails in patients with tibial fractures (SPRINT).扩髓与非扩髓髓内钉治疗闭合性和开放性胫骨骨折的经济学评价:前瞻性评价胫骨骨折患者使用扩髓髓内钉(SPRINT)研究的结果。
Value Health. 2011 Jun;14(4):450-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2010.10.034. Epub 2011 May 25.
7
Randomized trial of reamed and unreamed intramedullary nailing of tibial shaft fractures.胫骨干骨折扩髓与非扩髓髓内钉固定的随机试验
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Dec;90(12):2567-78. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.01694.
8
Randomized, prospective comparison of plate versus intramedullary nail fixation for distal tibia shaft fractures.随机、前瞻性比较钢板与髓内钉固定治疗胫骨骨干远端骨折。
J Orthop Trauma. 2011 Dec;25(12):736-41. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e318213f709.
9
Prognostic factors for predicting outcomes after intramedullary nailing of the tibia.预测胫骨髓内钉治疗后结局的预后因素。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Oct 3;94(19):1786-93. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.J.01418.
10
Which Surgical Treatment for Open Tibial Shaft Fractures Results in the Fewest Reoperations? A Network Meta-analysis.哪种手术治疗开放性胫骨干骨折导致的再次手术最少?一项网状Meta分析。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Jul;473(7):2179-92. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4224-y. Epub 2015 Feb 28.

引用本文的文献

1
[Non-unions of the upper extremities].[上肢骨不连]
Chirurgie (Heidelb). 2024 Aug;95(8):671-682. doi: 10.1007/s00104-024-02095-w. Epub 2024 Jun 3.
2
What Would be the Difference Between Operative Treatment of Patients with Tibia Fractures out of Working Hours; Intramedullary Nailing for Tibial Shaft Fractures.非工作时间胫骨骨折患者手术治疗的差异;胫骨干骨折的髓内钉固定术
Sisli Etfal Hastan Tip Bul. 2023 Mar 21;57(1):118-123. doi: 10.14744/SEMB.2022.11129. eCollection 2023.
3
Research trends in the field of the gut-brain interaction: Functional dyspepsia in the spotlight - An integrated bibliometric and science mapping approach.肠脑互动领域的研究趋势:聚焦功能性消化不良——一种综合文献计量学与科学图谱的方法
Front Neurosci. 2023 Mar 8;17:1109510. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1109510. eCollection 2023.
4
Correlation Between the Fracture Line Plane and Perioperative Deep Vein Thrombosis in Patients with Tibial Fracture.胫骨骨折患者骨折线平面与围手术期深静脉血栓的相关性。
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2021 Jan-Dec;27:10760296211067258. doi: 10.1177/10760296211067258.

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of Surgeon and Hospital Volume on Morbidity and Mortality After Hip Fracture.髋关节骨折术后发病率和死亡率的外科医生和医院容量的影响。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017 Sep 20;99(18):1547-1553. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.16.01133.
2
Relation between surgeon volume and risk of complications after total hip arthroplasty: propensity score matched cohort study.髋关节置换术后总体并发症风险与外科医生手术量的关系:倾向评分匹配队列研究。
BMJ. 2014 May 23;348:g3284. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g3284.
3
Is changing hospitals for revision total joint arthroplasty associated with more complications?翻修全关节置换术后更换医院是否会增加并发症?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Jul;472(7):2006-15. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3515-z. Epub 2014 Mar 11.
4
Is hospital volume associated with length of stay, re‑admissions and reoperations for total hip replacement? A population‑based register analysis of 78 hospitals and 54,505 replacements.医院手术量与全髋关节置换术的住院时间、再入院和再手术有关吗?基于人群的 78 家医院和 54505 例置换术的登记分析。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2013 Dec;133(12):1747-55. doi: 10.1007/s00402-013-1860-0.
5
The role of surgeon volume on patient outcome in total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review of the literature.外科医生手术量对全膝关节置换术患者预后的影响:文献系统评价。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2012 Dec 14;13:250. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-13-250.
6
In brief: closed tibial shaft fractures.简而言之:闭合性胫骨干骨折。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Dec;469(12):3518-21. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-2086-5. Epub 2011 Sep 20.
7
Hip arthroscopy: analysis of a single surgeon's learning experience.髋关节镜检查:一位外科医生学习经验的分析。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 May;93 Suppl 2:52-6. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.J.01587.
8
The effects of hospital and surgeon volume on postoperative complications after LumbarSpine surgery.医院和外科医生手术量对腰椎手术后术后并发症的影响。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Nov 15;36(24):2069-75. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318202ac56.
9
A systematic review and meta-analysis of the relationship between hospital/surgeon volume and outcome for radical cystectomy: an update for the ongoing debate.根治性膀胱切除术的医院/外科医生手术量与结局的系统回顾和荟萃分析:正在进行的辩论的最新进展。
Eur Urol. 2011 May;59(5):775-83. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.01.037. Epub 2011 Feb 1.
10
Surgeon case volume, not institution case volume, is the primary determinant of in-hospital mortality after elective open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.外科医生手术量而非机构手术量是择期开放腹主动脉瘤修复术后院内死亡率的主要决定因素。
J Vasc Surg. 2011 Mar;53(3):591-599.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.09.063. Epub 2010 Dec 8.