Suppr超能文献

髋关节骨折术后发病率和死亡率的外科医生和医院容量的影响。

Effect of Surgeon and Hospital Volume on Morbidity and Mortality After Hip Fracture.

机构信息

1Department of Orthopaedics, Kaiser Moanalua Medical Center, Honolulu, Hawaii 2Surgical Outcomes and Analysis Department, Kaiser Permanente, San Diego, California.

出版信息

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017 Sep 20;99(18):1547-1553. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.16.01133.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Prior studies have examined the relationship between surgeon and hospital volumes and outcome following hip fracture surgical procedures, but the results have been inconclusive. The purpose of this study was to assess the hip fracture volume-outcome relationship by analyzing data from a large, managed care registry.

METHODS

The Kaiser Permanente Hip Fracture Registry prospectively records information on surgically treated hip fractures within the managed health-care system. Using this registry, all surgically treated hip fractures in patients 60 years of age or older were identified. Surgeon and hospital volume were defined as the number of hip fracture surgical procedures performed in the preceding 12 months and were divided into tertiles (low, medium, and high). The primary outcome was mortality at 1 year postoperatively. Secondary outcomes were mortality at 30 and 90 days postoperatively as well as reoperation (lifetime), medical complications (90-day), and unplanned readmission (30-day). To determine the relationship between volume and these outcome measures, multivariate logistic and Cox proportional hazards regression were performed, controlling for potentially confounding variables.

RESULTS

Of 14,294 patients in the study sample, the majority were female (71%) and white (79%), and the mean age was 81 years. The overall mortality rate was 6% at 30 days, 11% at 90 days, and 21% at 1 year. We did not find an association between surgeon or hospital volume and mortality at 30 days, 90 days, or 1 year (p > 0.05). There was also no association between surgeon or hospital volume and reoperation, medical complications, or unplanned readmission (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In this analysis of hip fractures treated in a large integrated health-care system, the observed rates of mortality, reoperation, medical complications, and unplanned readmission did not differ by surgeon or hospital volume. In contrast to other orthopaedic procedures, such as total joint arthroplasty, our data do not suggest that hip fractures need to be preferentially directed toward high-volume surgeons or hospitals for treatment.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

摘要

背景

先前的研究已经探讨了外科医生和医院数量与髋部骨折手术治疗结果之间的关系,但结果尚无定论。本研究的目的是通过分析来自大型管理式医疗保健注册中心的数据来评估髋部骨折数量与结果之间的关系。

方法

Kaiser Permanente 髋部骨折注册中心前瞻性地记录了管理式医疗保健系统内接受手术治疗的髋部骨折信息。使用该注册中心,确定了所有 60 岁及以上接受手术治疗的髋部骨折患者。外科医生和医院的数量定义为过去 12 个月内进行的髋部骨折手术数量,并分为三分之一(低、中、高)。主要结果是术后 1 年的死亡率。次要结果是术后 30 天和 90 天的死亡率、再手术(终生)、医疗并发症(90 天)和非计划再入院(30 天)。为了确定数量与这些结果测量值之间的关系,进行了多变量逻辑和 Cox 比例风险回归分析,同时控制了潜在的混杂变量。

结果

在研究样本的 14294 名患者中,大多数为女性(71%)和白人(79%),平均年龄为 81 岁。总体死亡率为 30 天 6%,90 天 11%,1 年 21%。我们没有发现外科医生或医院数量与 30 天、90 天或 1 年死亡率之间存在关联(p > 0.05)。外科医生或医院数量与再手术、医疗并发症或非计划再入院之间也没有关联(p > 0.05)。

结论

在这项对大型综合医疗保健系统中治疗的髋部骨折的分析中,观察到的死亡率、再手术、医疗并发症和非计划再入院率与外科医生或医院数量无关。与全关节置换术等其他骨科手术不同,我们的数据表明髋部骨折不需要优先选择高容量的外科医生或医院进行治疗。

证据水平

治疗性 IV 级。有关证据水平的完整说明,请参阅作者说明。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验