Suppr超能文献

门诊环境下替考拉宁每周三次给药的评估:一项回顾性观察性多中心研究。

Evaluation of a thrice weekly administration of teicoplanin in the outpatient setting: a retrospective observational multicentre study.

作者信息

Asumang John, Heard Katie L, Troise Oliver, Fahmy Sandra, Mughal Nabeela, Moore Luke S P, Hughes Stephen

机构信息

School of Medicine, Imperial College, London, SW7 2DD, UK.

Chelsea and Westminster NHS Foundation Trust, 369 Fulham Road, London SW10 9NH, UK.

出版信息

JAC Antimicrob Resist. 2021 Feb 21;3(1):dlab012. doi: 10.1093/jacamr/dlab012. eCollection 2021 Mar.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The glycopeptide teicoplanin is commonly utilized to facilitate outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT). Licensed for once daily maintenance dosing, teicoplanin's long half-life allows for less frequent dosing (e.g. thrice weekly) following successful loading. This service evaluation reviews the safety and effectiveness of a novel thrice weekly teicoplanin dosing regimen.

METHODS

A retrospective, observational study was conducted at Chelsea and Westminster Hospital (March 2018 to July 2020), evaluating trough serum teicoplanin concentrations for patients receiving >5 days of teicoplanin in the OPAT setting. Teicoplanin dosing and administration (once daily versus thrice weekly), clinical outcomes and therapeutic levels were analysed for all patients. The project was registered with clinical governance locally.

RESULTS

A total of 82 patients treated with teicoplanin in the OPAT service were included; 53/82 receiving thrice weekly and 29/82 receiving once daily dosing. Mean teicoplanin trough levels were similar in both groups (26.2 mg/L and 25.8 mg/L in once daily and thrice weekly groups, =0.8895). High clinical success rates were recorded in both groups (25/29 [86.2%] versus 50/53 [94.3%]). No correlation with clinical outcomes and initial teicoplanin serum levels was identified. Normal renal function (>90 mL/min) was associated with lower teicoplanin serum concentrations (mean [±SD] 21.4 mg/L [±10.1] versus 29.7 mg/L [±14], =0.0178) in the thrice weekly dosed group but not with the once daily dosed group (mean [±SD] 28.2 mg/L [±9.4] versus 23.7 mg/L [±9.9], =0.2201).

CONCLUSIONS

This study supports thrice weekly teicoplanin as a convenient and effective OPAT for administration in the OPAT setting. Therapeutic drug monitoring is advised to adjust for intra-patient variability.

摘要

引言

糖肽类药物替考拉宁常用于促进门诊胃肠外抗菌治疗(OPAT)。替考拉宁获批每日一次维持给药,其较长的半衰期使得在成功负荷给药后可减少给药频率(如每周三次)。本服务评估回顾了一种新型的替考拉宁每周三次给药方案的安全性和有效性。

方法

在切尔西和威斯敏斯特医院进行了一项回顾性观察研究(2018年3月至2020年7月),评估在OPAT环境中接受替考拉宁治疗超过5天的患者的替考拉宁血清谷浓度。分析了所有患者的替考拉宁给药和用药情况(每日一次与每周三次)、临床结局和治疗水平。该项目在当地进行了临床治理登记。

结果

共有82例在OPAT服务中接受替考拉宁治疗的患者纳入研究;82例中有53例接受每周三次给药,29例接受每日一次给药。两组的替考拉宁平均谷浓度相似(每日一次组和每周三次组分别为26.2mg/L和25.8mg/L,P = 0.8895)。两组均记录到较高的临床成功率(25/29 [86.2%] 对50/53 [94.3%])。未发现临床结局与初始替考拉宁血清水平之间存在相关性。在每周三次给药组中,肾功能正常(>90mL/min)与较低的替考拉宁血清浓度相关(平均[±标准差] 21.4mg/L [±10.1] 对29.7mg/L [±14],P = 0.0178),但在每日一次给药组中无相关性(平均[±标准差] 28.2mg/L [±9.4] 对23.7mg/L [±9.9],P = 0.2201)。

结论

本研究支持每周三次替考拉宁作为一种在OPAT环境中方便有效的OPAT给药方式。建议进行治疗药物监测以调整患者个体差异。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of a thrice weekly administration of teicoplanin in the outpatient setting: a retrospective observational multicentre study.
JAC Antimicrob Resist. 2021 Feb 21;3(1):dlab012. doi: 10.1093/jacamr/dlab012. eCollection 2021 Mar.
5
Clinical outcomes of teicoplanin use in the OPAT setting.
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2020 Mar;55(3):105888. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.105888. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
7
Comparative pharmacokinetics of teicoplanin and vancomycin.
J Chemother. 2000 Nov;12 Suppl 5:15-20. doi: 10.1080/1120009x.2000.11782313.
8
Increased teicoplanin doses are associated with improved serum levels but not drug toxicity.
J Infect. 2014 Jan;68(1):43-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2013.08.018. Epub 2013 Sep 3.
9
Retrospective review of serum teicoplanin concentrations in clinical trials and their relationship to clinical outcome.
J Infect Chemother. 1996;2(4):197-208. doi: 10.1007/BF02355116. Epub 2014 Apr 5.
10
Three-times weekly teicoplanin as outpatient treatment of chronic osteoarticular infections.
J Chemother. 2009 Aug;21(4):421-5. doi: 10.1179/joc.2009.21.4.421.

本文引用的文献

1
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Teicoplanin in Haematological Malignancy Patients with Febrile Neutropenia and Optimizing Dosage Regimens.
Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2018 Nov;123(5):594-601. doi: 10.1111/bcpt.13029. Epub 2018 Jun 13.
2
Population pharmacokinetics of teicoplanin and attainment of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic targets in adult patients with haematological malignancy.
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2017 Sep;23(9):674.e7-674.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2017.02.032. Epub 2017 Mar 6.
3
Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis of teicoplanin in patients with MRSA infections.
Clin Pharmacol. 2016 Mar 30;8:15-8. doi: 10.2147/CPAA.S96143. eCollection 2016.
4
Factors associated with outcome and duration of therapy in outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT) patients with skin and soft-tissue infections.
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2011 Sep;38(3):243-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2011.05.008. Epub 2011 Jul 7.
5
An initial dosing method for teicoplanin based on the area under the serum concentration time curve required for MRSA eradication.
J Infect Chemother. 2011 Apr;17(2):297-300. doi: 10.1007/s10156-010-0105-1. Epub 2010 Aug 17.
6
Clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT): a UK perspective.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2009 Dec;64(6):1316-24. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkp343. Epub 2009 Sep 19.
7
Three-times weekly teicoplanin as outpatient treatment of chronic osteoarticular infections.
J Chemother. 2009 Aug;21(4):421-5. doi: 10.1179/joc.2009.21.4.421.
8
Comparative efficacy and safety of vancomycin versus teicoplanin: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009 Oct;53(10):4069-79. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00341-09. Epub 2009 Jul 13.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验