• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社会经济地位与院内心脏骤停:一项系统综述。

Socioeconomic status and in-hospital cardiac arrest: A systematic review.

作者信息

Stankovic Nikola, Høybye Maria, Lind Peter Carøe, Holmberg Mathias, Andersen Lars W

机构信息

Research Center for Emergency Medicine, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University and Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul Jensens Boulevard 99, Aarhus N, 8200, Denmark.

Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.

出版信息

Resusc Plus. 2020 Jul 9;3:100016. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2020.100016. eCollection 2020 Sep.

DOI:10.1016/j.resplu.2020.100016
PMID:34223299
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8244497/
Abstract

AIM

To perform a review of the literature on the association between socioeconomic status and risk of and outcomes after in-hospital cardiac arrest.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed and Embase were searched on January 24, 2020 for studies evaluating the association between socioeconomic status and risk of and/or outcomes after in-hospital cardiac arrest. Two reviewers independently screened the titles/abstracts and selected full texts for relevance. Data were extracted from included studies. Risk of bias was assessed using the Quality In Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool.

RESULTS

The literature search yielded 4960 unique records. We included nine studies evaluating the association between socioeconomic status and risk of and/or outcomes after in-hospital cardiac arrest. All studies were observational cohort studies, of which seven were from the USA. Seven studies were in an adult population, while two studies were in a pediatric population. Results were overall inconsistent although some studies found a higher in-hospital cardiac arrest incidence in patients from low-income communities. There was no clear association between other socioeconomic factors (i.e. education, occupation, marital status, and insurance) and risk of or outcomes after in-hospital cardiac arrest. Due to the scarcity and heterogeneity of available studies, meta-analyses were not performed.

CONCLUSION

There are limited data regarding the association between socioeconomic status and risk of and outcomes after in-hospital cardiac arrest and further research is warranted. Understanding the association between socioeconomic status and in-hospital cardiac arrest may reveal strategies to mitigate potential inequalities.

摘要

目的

对关于社会经济地位与院内心脏骤停风险及预后之间关联的文献进行综述。

数据来源

于2020年1月24日在PubMed和Embase数据库中检索评估社会经济地位与院内心脏骤停风险及/或预后之间关联的研究。两名综述员独立筛选标题/摘要,并选择相关的全文。从纳入的研究中提取数据。使用预后研究质量(QUIPS)工具评估偏倚风险。

结果

文献检索得到4960条独特记录。我们纳入了9项评估社会经济地位与院内心脏骤停风险及/或预后之间关联的研究。所有研究均为观察性队列研究,其中7项来自美国。7项研究针对成年人群,2项研究针对儿科人群。尽管一些研究发现低收入社区患者的院内心脏骤停发生率较高,但结果总体不一致。其他社会经济因素(即教育程度、职业、婚姻状况和保险)与院内心脏骤停风险或预后之间没有明确关联。由于现有研究的稀缺性和异质性,未进行荟萃分析。

结论

关于社会经济地位与院内心脏骤停风险及预后之间关联的数据有限,有必要进一步研究。了解社会经济地位与院内心脏骤停之间的关联可能会揭示减轻潜在不平等的策略。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4704/8244497/81bb8ff02748/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4704/8244497/81bb8ff02748/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4704/8244497/81bb8ff02748/gr1.jpg

相似文献

1
Socioeconomic status and in-hospital cardiac arrest: A systematic review.社会经济地位与院内心脏骤停:一项系统综述。
Resusc Plus. 2020 Jul 9;3:100016. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2020.100016. eCollection 2020 Sep.
2
Prognostic association of frailty with post-arrest outcomes following cardiac arrest: A systematic review and meta-analysis.衰弱与心搏骤停后预后结局的相关性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Resuscitation. 2021 Oct;167:242-250. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.06.009. Epub 2021 Jun 21.
3
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
4
Socioeconomic status and risk of in-hospital cardiac arrest.社会经济地位与院内心脏骤停风险。
Resuscitation. 2022 Aug;177:69-77. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2022.05.014. Epub 2022 May 23.
5
Association between pacifier use and breast-feeding, sudden infant death syndrome, infection and dental malocclusion.安抚奶嘴使用与母乳喂养、婴儿猝死综合征、感染及牙列不齐之间的关联。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2005;3(6):1-33. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200503060-00001.
6
Does care at a cardiac arrest centre improve outcome after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest? - A systematic review.心脏骤停中心的护理是否能改善院外心脏骤停后的预后?——系统评价。
Resuscitation. 2019 Apr;137:102-115. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.02.006. Epub 2019 Feb 16.
7
Socioeconomic inequality in cancer in the Nordic countries. A systematic review.北欧国家癌症的社会经济不平等。系统评价。
Acta Oncol. 2022 Nov;61(11):1317-1331. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2022.2143278. Epub 2022 Nov 11.
8
Inequalities in Income and Education Are Associated With Survival Differences After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: Nationwide Observational Study.收入和教育不平等与院外心脏骤停后生存差异相关:全国观察性研究。
Circulation. 2021 Dec 14;144(24):1915-1925. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.056012. Epub 2021 Nov 12.
9
Oxygenation and ventilation targets after cardiac arrest: A systematic review and meta-analysis.心脏骤停后的氧合与通气目标:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Resuscitation. 2020 Jul;152:107-115. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.04.031. Epub 2020 May 8.
10
Prophylactic antibiotic use following cardiac arrest: A systematic review and meta-analysis.心脏骤停后预防性使用抗生素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Resuscitation. 2019 Aug;141:166-173. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.04.047. Epub 2019 May 11.

引用本文的文献

1
The incidence, predictors, and causes of cardiac arrest in United States emergency departments.美国急诊科心脏骤停的发生率、预测因素及病因
Resusc Plus. 2023 Nov 24;17:100514. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2023.100514. eCollection 2024 Mar.
2
In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in United States Emergency Departments, 2010-2018.2010 - 2018年美国急诊科的院内心脏骤停
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Apr 11;9:874461. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.874461. eCollection 2022.
3
Trends in In-Hospital Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation from 2010 through 2019: A Nationwide Cohort Study in South Korea.

本文引用的文献

1
Association between Hospital volume of cardiopulmonary resuscitation for in-hospital cardiac arrest and survival to Hospital discharge.院内心脏骤停心肺复苏的医院救治量与出院生存率之间的关联。
Resuscitation. 2020 Mar 1;148:25-31. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.12.037. Epub 2020 Jan 13.
2
Socio-economic differences in incidence, bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation and survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A systematic review.社会经济差异对院外心脏骤停发生率、旁观者心肺复苏和生存的影响:系统评价。
Resuscitation. 2019 Aug;141:44-62. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.05.018. Epub 2019 Jun 12.
3
2010年至2019年韩国院内心肺复苏趋势:一项全国性队列研究
J Pers Med. 2022 Mar 1;12(3):377. doi: 10.3390/jpm12030377.
4
Discriminatory cardiac arrest care? Patients with low socioeconomic status receive delayed cardiopulmonary resuscitation and are less likely to survive an in-hospital cardiac arrest.歧视性的心脏骤停治疗?社会经济地位较低的患者接受心肺复苏的时间延迟,并且在院内心脏骤停后更难存活。
Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 21;42(8):861-869. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa954.
Socioeconomic position and use of healthcare in the last year of life: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
社会经济地位与生命终末期的医疗保健使用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS Med. 2019 Apr 23;16(4):e1002782. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002782. eCollection 2019 Apr.
4
Administrative Billing Codes for Identifying Patients With Cardiac Arrest.用于识别心脏骤停患者的行政计费代码。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Apr 2;73(12):1598-1600. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.01.030.
5
In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Review.院内心搏骤停:综述。
JAMA. 2019 Mar 26;321(12):1200-1210. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.1696.
6
Relationship between socioeconomic factors, distribution of public access defibrillators and incidence of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.社会经济因素、公共体外除颤器分布与院外心脏骤停发生率之间的关系。
Resuscitation. 2019 May;138:53-58. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.02.022. Epub 2019 Feb 22.
7
Socioeconomic Status and Cardiovascular Outcomes: Challenges and Interventions.社会经济地位与心血管结局:挑战与干预。
Circulation. 2018 May 15;137(20):2166-2178. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.029652.
8
In-hospital cardiac arrest: are we overlooking a key distinction?院内心搏骤停:我们是否忽视了一个关键区别?
Curr Opin Crit Care. 2018 Jun;24(3):151-157. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000505.
9
Socioeconomic status and risk of intensive care unit admission with sepsis.社会经济地位与脓毒症患者入住重症监护病房的风险。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2018 Aug;62(7):983-992. doi: 10.1111/aas.13114. Epub 2018 Mar 22.
10
Neighborhood characteristics, bystander automated external defibrillator use, and patient outcomes in public out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.社区特征、旁观者自动体外除颤器的使用与院外心脏骤停患者预后的关系。
Resuscitation. 2018 May;126:72-79. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.02.021. Epub 2018 Mar 2.