Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
AHN Cancer Institute, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Dec;28(13):9116-9125. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-10289-3. Epub 2021 Jul 5.
Early recurrence (ER) is a significant challenge for patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases (CRPM) following cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS HIPEC). Preoperative risk stratification for ER would improve preoperative decision making.
We conducted a retrospective study examining patients who underwent CRS HIPEC for CRPM from 2000 to 2018. Optimal definition of ER was determined via minimum p-value approach based on differentiation of post-recurrence survival. Risk factors for ER were assessed in a derivation cohort by uni- and multivariate logistic regression. A predictive score for ER was generated using preoperative variables and validated in an independent cohort.
384 patients were analyzed, 316 (82%) had documented recurrence. Optimal length of post-operative RFS to distinguish ER (n = 144, 46%) vs. late recurrence (LR) (n = 172, 63%) was 8 mos (p<0.01). ER patients had shorter median OS post-CRS-HIPEC (13.6 vs. 39.4 mos, p<0.01). Preoperative BMI (OR 1.88), liver lesions (OR 1.89), progression on chemotherapy (OR 2.14), positive lymph nodes (OR 2.47) and PCI score (16-20: OR 1.7; >20: OR 4.37) were significant predictors of ER (all p<0.05). Using this model, patients were assigned risk scores from 0 to 9. Intermediate (scores 4-6) and high-risk patients (score 7-9) had observed rates of ER of 56% and 79% and overall 2-year survival rates of 27% and 0% respectively. The model showed fair discrimination (AUC 0.72) and good calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow GOF p = 0.68).
ER predicts markedly worse OS following surgery. Preoperative factors can accurately stratify risk for ER and identify patients in whom CRS-HIPEC for CPRM is futile.
对于接受细胞减灭术联合腹腔热灌注化疗(CRS HIPEC)治疗的结直肠腹膜转移(CRPM)患者,早期复发(ER)是一个重大挑战。术前对 ER 进行风险分层将改善术前决策。
我们进行了一项回顾性研究,纳入了 2000 年至 2018 年间接受 CRS HIPEC 治疗 CRPM 的患者。通过基于复发后生存差异的最小 p 值方法确定 ER 的最佳定义。在一个推导队列中,通过单变量和多变量逻辑回归评估 ER 的危险因素。使用术前变量生成 ER 的预测评分,并在独立队列中进行验证。
分析了 384 例患者,其中 316 例(82%)有记录的复发。区分 ER(n = 144,46%)与晚期复发(LR)(n = 172,63%)的最佳术后 RFS 长度为 8 个月(p < 0.01)。ER 患者在接受 CRS-HIPEC 后的中位 OS 更短(13.6 与 39.4 个月,p < 0.01)。术前 BMI(OR 1.88)、肝转移病灶(OR 1.89)、化疗进展(OR 2.14)、阳性淋巴结(OR 2.47)和 PCI 评分(16-20:OR 1.7;>20:OR 4.37)是 ER 的显著预测因素(均 p < 0.05)。使用该模型,患者的风险评分从 0 到 9 分。中危(评分 4-6)和高危(评分 7-9)患者的 ER 发生率分别为 56%和 79%,总 2 年生存率分别为 27%和 0%。该模型显示出较好的区分度(AUC 0.72)和良好的校准度(Hosmer-Lemeshow GOF p = 0.68)。
ER 预测手术治疗后 OS 明显变差。术前因素可准确分层 ER 风险,并识别出 CPRM 患者接受 CRS-HIPEC 治疗无益。