Professor Dr Md Humayun Kabir Talukder, Professor (Curriculum Development and Evaluation), Centre for Medical Education (CME), Dhaka, Bangladesh; Email:
Mymensingh Med J. 2021 Jul;30(3):789-795.
Curriculum is the road map of any course and an instrument for developing the competencies of the human resources. The MBBS curriculum in our country was last updated in 2012 during the period of Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). Since then it has been under implementation in different government, non-government and Army medical colleges in association with different universities. "Health Professional for a New Century" now asks for a transformation of the education to strengthen the health systems for meeting the challenges of the 21st century. Curriculum reform is an important issue in transformative education and need assessment is the first and essential task to review and update any curriculum. The objective of the study was to assess the need to review and update the MBBS curriculum 2012 of Bangladesh. Review and updating of MBBS curriculum was organized by Centre for Medical Education (CME) and supported by World Health Organization (WHO). CME, DGHS, Dean offices, MOH&FW, BM&DC and all the government and non-government medical colleges were involved in this activity. Duration of study was 7 months from April 2019 to October 2019. Data were collected from academic councils of 102 medical colleges through structured questionnaire and through FGD with teachers and interns. Around 90(88.2%) academic councils agreed and 12(12%) disagreed about the appropriateness of existing four phases of MBBS curriculum. About 80(84.2%) academic councils agreed with 1.5 years duration of Phase I, 84(88.4%) agreed with one year duration of Phase II, 84(94.4%) agreed with one year duration of Phase III and 77(84.6%) agreed with 1.5 years duration of Phase IV. The study suggested the subjects for 2nd phase are, Pharmacology 74(84.1%), Pathology 53(60.3%), Forensic Medicine 46(52.3%), and for 3rd phase are Community Medicine 60(69.8%), Microbiology 54(62.8%). The study revealed that the subjects of overloaded contents are, Anatomy - 24(50%), Community Medicine - 35(72.9%) and Pathology - 19(39.6%). The study suggested incorporation of organized teaching-learning for behavioral science, communication skills, ethics and development of attitude by most of the academic councils. The study suggested that the increased duration of ambulatory care (outdoor/emergency) teaching. The study revealed around 84(83.2%) academic councils recommended that Single Best Answer (SBA) type of questions should be included in MCQ part for all subjects along with multiple true-false response and around 82(81.2%) academic councils recommended that Structured Essay Question (SEQ) should be included in written part along with Short Answer Question (SAQ). The study revealed that 58(58.6%) academic councils recommended that carry-on system should not be in Phase I and 53(53.5%) academic councils opined to introduce grading system in MBBS course. Most of the academic councils agreed about the appropriateness of existing four phases of MBBS curriculum. The subjects for 2nd phase are, Pharmacology - 84.1%, Pathology - 60.3%, Forensic Medicine - 52.3%, and for 3rd phase are Community Medicine - 69.8%, Microbiology - 62.8%. Most of the participants are in favour of the present curriculum components, grading system for assessment but not the carry-on system in Phase I. The study recommended for national level consultations involving the concerned persons for finalization of the MBBS curriculum.
课程是任何课程的路线图,也是培养人力资源能力的工具。我国的 MBBS 课程最后一次更新是在 2012 年千年发展目标(MDGs)期间。从那时起,它就在不同的政府、非政府和军队医学院与不同的大学一起实施。“新世纪的卫生专业人员”现在要求教育转型,以加强卫生系统,迎接 21 世纪的挑战。课程改革是转型教育中的一个重要问题,需要评估是审查和更新任何课程的首要和必要任务。本研究的目的是评估审查和更新孟加拉国 2012 年 MBBS 课程的需求。MBBS 课程的审查和更新由医学教育中心(CME)组织,并得到世界卫生组织(WHO)的支持。CME、DGHS、院长办公室、MOH&FW、BM&DC 以及所有政府和非政府医学院都参与了这项活动。研究时间从 2019 年 4 月至 2019 年 10 月,为期 7 个月。通过结构问卷调查和与教师和实习生的焦点小组讨论,从 102 所医学院的学术委员会收集数据。约 90(88.2%)个学术委员会同意,12(12%)个不同意现有 MBBS 课程四个阶段的适当性。约 80(84.2%)个学术委员会同意第一阶段的持续时间为 1.5 年,84(88.4%)个同意第二阶段的持续时间为 1 年,84(94.4%)个同意第三阶段的持续时间为 1 年,77(84.6%)个同意第四阶段的持续时间为 1.5 年。研究建议第二阶段的科目是药理学 74(84.1%)、病理学 53(60.3%)、法医学 46(52.3%),第三阶段的科目是社区医学 60(69.8%)、微生物学 54(62.8%)。研究表明,内容负担过重的科目是解剖学-24(50%)、社区医学-35(72.9%)和病理学-19(39.6%)。研究建议大多数学术委员会将有组织的教学-学习行为科学、沟通技巧、伦理和态度发展纳入其中。研究建议增加门诊/急诊教学的时间。研究表明,约 84(83.2%)个学术委员会建议在所有科目中包括单项最佳答案(SBA)类型的问题,同时包括多项真假反应,约 82(81.2%)个学术委员会建议在书面部分包括结构化论文问题(SEQ),同时包括简答题。研究表明,58(58.6%)个学术委员会建议不要在第一阶段实行继续制,53(53.5%)个学术委员会认为应在 MBBS 课程中引入评分制。大多数学术委员会同意现有 MBBS 课程四个阶段的适当性。第二阶段的科目是药理学-84.1%、病理学-60.3%、法医学-52.3%,第三阶段的科目是社区医学-69.8%、微生物学-62.8%。大多数参与者对目前的课程组成部分、评估的评分系统表示赞同,但对第一阶段的继续制不表示赞同。研究建议进行国家一级的协商,让有关人员参与最终确定 MBBS 课程。