Taamouti Abderrahim
Department of Economics and Finance Durham University Business School Mill Hill Lane Durham DH1 3LB UK.
Oxf Bull Econ Stat. 2021 Oct;83(5):1011-1028. doi: 10.1111/obes.12442. Epub 2021 May 24.
Hard lockdowns have left policymakers to face the ethical dilemma of choosing between saving lives and saving the economy. However, massive testing could have helped to respond more effectively to Covid-19 crisis. In this paper, we study the trade-off between infection control, lockdown and testing. The aim is to understand how these policies can be effectively combined to contain Covid-19 without damaging the economy. An extended SIR epidemic model is developed to identify the set of testing and lockdown levels that lead to a reproduction number below one, thus to infection control and saving lives. Depending on whether the testing policy is static or dynamic, the model suggests that testing 4% to 7% of the population is the way to safely reopen the economy and the society.
严格的封锁措施让政策制定者面临在拯救生命和拯救经济之间做出抉择的伦理困境。然而,大规模检测本可有助于更有效地应对新冠疫情危机。在本文中,我们研究了感染控制、封锁和检测之间的权衡。目的是了解如何能有效地将这些政策结合起来,以控制新冠疫情且不损害经济。我们开发了一个扩展的SIR传染病模型,以确定能使再生数低于1从而实现感染控制和拯救生命的检测及封锁水平组合。根据检测政策是静态还是动态的情况,该模型表明,对4%至7%的人口进行检测是安全重启经济和社会的途径。