• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于帕累托的 COVID-19 大流行应对措施的国家评估表明,拯救生命和保护经济不是相互排斥的目标。

Pareto-based evaluation of national responses to COVID-19 pandemic shows that saving lives and protecting economy are non-trade-off objectives.

机构信息

Institute of Fundamental Technological Research, Polish Academy of Sciences, 02-106, Warsaw, Poland.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 28;11(1):2425. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-81869-2.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-021-81869-2
PMID:33510274
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7844048/
Abstract

Countries worldwide have adopted various strategies to minimize the socio-economic impact of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. Stringency of imposed measures universally reflects the standpoint from which protecting public health and avoiding damage to economy are seen as contradictory objectives. Based on epidemic trajectories of 25 highly developed countries and 10 US states in the (mobility reduction)-(reproduction number) plane we showed that delay in imposition of nation-wide quarantine elevates the number of infections and deaths, surge of which inevitably has to be suppressed by stringent and sustained lockdown. As a consequence, cumulative mobility reduction and population-normalized cumulative number of COVID-19-associated deaths are significantly correlated and this correlation increases with time. Overall, we demonstrated that, as long as epidemic suppression is the aim, the trade-off between the death toll and economic loss is illusory: high death toll correlates with deep and long-lasting lockdown causing a severe economic downturn.

摘要

全球各国采取了各种策略来将新冠疫情对社会经济的影响最小化。所实施措施的严格程度普遍反映了保护公众健康和避免经济受损这两个目标被视为相互矛盾的立场。基于 25 个高度发达的国家和 10 个美国州在(流动性降低)-(繁殖数)平面上的疫情轨迹,我们表明,全国性隔离措施的延迟实施会增加感染和死亡人数,而这种疫情的激增必然需要通过严格和持续的封锁来抑制。因此,累计流动性降低和人口标准化的与 COVID-19 相关的死亡人数呈显著相关,并且这种相关性会随着时间的推移而增加。总的来说,我们证明了,只要疫情抑制是目标,那么在死亡人数和经济损失之间进行权衡是虚幻的:高死亡率与深度和长期的封锁相关,从而导致严重的经济衰退。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9724/7844048/8eb2928b008f/41598_2021_81869_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9724/7844048/8eb2928b008f/41598_2021_81869_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9724/7844048/8eb2928b008f/41598_2021_81869_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Pareto-based evaluation of national responses to COVID-19 pandemic shows that saving lives and protecting economy are non-trade-off objectives.基于帕累托的 COVID-19 大流行应对措施的国家评估表明,拯救生命和保护经济不是相互排斥的目标。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 28;11(1):2425. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-81869-2.
2
Preparedness and Responses Faced during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Belgium: An Observational Study and Using the National Open Data.比利时在 COVID-19 大流行期间的准备和应对措施:一项观察性研究和利用国家开放数据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 30;17(21):7985. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17217985.
3
Could masks curtail the post-lockdown resurgence of COVID-19 in the US?口罩能否遏制美国疫情封锁解除后的反弹?
Math Biosci. 2020 Nov;329:108452. doi: 10.1016/j.mbs.2020.108452. Epub 2020 Aug 18.
4
Lives saved and lost in the first six month of the US COVID-19 pandemic: A retrospective cost-benefit analysis.美国 COVID-19 大流行的头六个月里逝去和幸存的生命:回顾性成本效益分析。
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 21;17(1):e0261759. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261759. eCollection 2022.
5
Effect of national and local lockdowns on the control of COVID-19 pandemic: a rapid review.国家和地方封锁措施对 COVID-19 大流行控制的影响:快速综述。
Epidemiol Prev. 2020 Sep-Dec;44(5-6 Suppl 2):60-68. doi: 10.19191/EP20.5-6.S2.104.
6
Global economic impacts of COVID-19 lockdown measures stand out in high-frequency shipping data.高频航运数据凸显了 COVID-19 封锁措施对全球经济的影响。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 14;16(4):e0248818. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248818. eCollection 2021.
7
Exploring the Trade-Off Between Economic and Health Outcomes During a Pandemic: A Discrete Choice Experiment of Lockdown Policies in Australia.探索大流行期间经济与健康结果之间的权衡:澳大利亚封锁政策的离散选择实验
Patient. 2021 May;14(3):359-371. doi: 10.1007/s40271-021-00503-5. Epub 2021 Mar 11.
8
Pandemic lockdown, healthcare policies and human rights: integrating opposed views on COVID-19 public health mitigation measures.大流行封锁、医疗保健政策和人权:整合对 COVID-19 公共卫生缓解措施的相反观点。
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2020 Dec 30;21(4):509-516. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm.2020.04.274.
9
Initial Assessment of the Impact of the Emergency State Lockdown Measures on the 1st Wave of the COVID-19 Epidemic in Portugal.紧急状态封锁措施对葡萄牙第一波新冠疫情影响的初步评估
Acta Med Port. 2020 Nov 2;33(11):733-741. doi: 10.20344/amp.14129.
10
Staggered release policies for COVID-19 control: Costs and benefits of relaxing restrictions by age and risk.分阶段放宽 COVID-19 控制措施的政策:按年龄和风险放宽限制的成本和收益。
Math Biosci. 2020 Aug;326:108405. doi: 10.1016/j.mbs.2020.108405. Epub 2020 Jun 18.

引用本文的文献

1
A Metric of Societal Burden Based on Virus Succession to Determine Economic Losses and Health Benefits of China's Lockdown Policies: Model Development and Validation.基于病毒传播的社会负担指标来衡量中国封锁政策的经济损失和健康效益:模型的开发和验证。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024 Jun 7;10:e48043. doi: 10.2196/48043.
2
A pandemic momentum index to manage the spread of COVID-19.一个用于管控新冠病毒病传播的大流行势头指数。
Technol Forecast Soc Change. 2023 Jul;192:122572. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122572. Epub 2023 Apr 10.
3
Optimal non-pharmaceutical intervention policy for Covid-19 epidemic via neuroevolution algorithm.

本文引用的文献

1
Magnitude, demographics and dynamics of the effect of the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic on all-cause mortality in 21 industrialized countries.新冠大流行第一波对 21 个工业化国家全因死亡率影响的规模、人口统计学特征和动态。
Nat Med. 2020 Dec;26(12):1919-1928. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-1112-0. Epub 2020 Oct 14.
2
Super-spreading events initiated the exponential growth phase of COVID-19 with ℛ higher than initially estimated.超级传播事件引发了新冠病毒病(COVID-19)的指数增长阶段,其基本再生数(ℛ)高于最初估计值。
R Soc Open Sci. 2020 Sep 23;7(9):200786. doi: 10.1098/rsos.200786. eCollection 2020 Sep.
3
A cross-country database of COVID-19 testing.
基于神经进化算法的新冠疫情最优非药物干预政策
Evol Med Public Health. 2022 Jan 28;10(1):59-70. doi: 10.1093/emph/eoac002. eCollection 2022.
4
The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: remaining uncertainties in our understanding of the epidemiology and transmission dynamics of the virus, and challenges to be overcome.严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)大流行:我们对该病毒流行病学和传播动态的理解中仍然存在的不确定性,以及有待克服的挑战。
Interface Focus. 2021 Oct 12;11(6):20210008. doi: 10.1098/rsfs.2021.0008. eCollection 2021 Dec 6.
5
Aggressive containment, suppression, and mitigation of covid-19: lessons learnt from eight countries.积极管控、抑制和缓解 2019 冠状病毒病:八个国家的经验教训。
BMJ. 2021 Nov 28;375:e067508. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2021-067508.
6
Deciphering the COVID-19 Health Economic Dilemma (HED): A Scoping Review.解读 COVID-19 健康经济困境 (HED):范围综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 10;18(18):9555. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18189555.
7
Robots and risk of COVID-19 workplace contagion: Evidence from Italy.机器人与新冠病毒工作场所传播风险:来自意大利的证据。
Technol Forecast Soc Change. 2021 Dec;173:121097. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121097. Epub 2021 Aug 7.
8
Lives versus Livelihoods? Perceived economic risk has a stronger association with support for COVID-19 preventive measures than perceived health risk.生命与生计?与感知健康风险相比,感知经济风险与对 COVID-19 预防措施的支持具有更强的相关性。
Sci Rep. 2021 May 6;11(1):9669. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-88314-4.
一个跨越国界的 COVID-19 检测数据库。
Sci Data. 2020 Oct 8;7(1):345. doi: 10.1038/s41597-020-00688-8.
4
Optimal temperature zone for the dispersal of COVID-19.新冠病毒传播的最佳温度带。
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Sep 20;736:139487. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139487. Epub 2020 May 16.
5
The Incubation Period of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) From Publicly Reported Confirmed Cases: Estimation and Application.新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)的潜伏期来自公开报告的确诊病例:估计和应用。
Ann Intern Med. 2020 May 5;172(9):577-582. doi: 10.7326/M20-0504. Epub 2020 Mar 10.
6
How generation intervals shape the relationship between growth rates and reproductive numbers.世代间隔如何塑造增长率与繁殖数之间的关系。
Proc Biol Sci. 2007 Feb 22;274(1609):599-604. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2006.3754.
7
Appropriate models for the management of infectious diseases.传染病管理的适当模式。
PLoS Med. 2005 Jul;2(7):e174. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020174. Epub 2005 Jul 26.