Suppr超能文献

[样品制备对采用液相色谱-串联质谱法分析人乳内源性肽的影响]

[Effect of sample preparation on analysis of human milk endogenous peptides using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry].

作者信息

Yu Wenhao, Yu Yang, Wang Wendan, Li Yitong, Szeto Ignatius M, Jin Yan

机构信息

CAS Key Laboratory of Separation Science for Analytical Chemistry, Dalian Institute of Chemical and Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Dalian 116023, China.

Beijing Yili Technology Development Co., Ltd., Beijing 100070, China.

出版信息

Se Pu. 2021 May;39(5):463-471. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1123.2020.08019.

Abstract

Hundreds of endogenous peptides were released from milk proteins within the human mammary gland and some of them possess a variety of bioactive functions. Thus, it is important to investigate human milk endogenous peptides for infant health. Peptidomics based on liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) has been used to investigate human milk endogenous peptides. Extraction of endogenous peptides from human milk is an essential and key procedure for analyzing human milk peptides using LC-MS/MS. This study aimed to compare methods for extracting endogenous peptides from human milk using LC-MS/MS. Ultrafiltration methods including that not involving denaturation (UF 1), that involving heat denaturation (UF 2), and that involving chemical denaturation (UF 3), precipitation methods using trichloroacetic acid (PCPN 1) and alcohol (PCPN 2), and an enrichment method using highly ordered mesoporous carbon (OMC) were used to extract endogenous peptides from human milk. Extracted endogenous peptides were then analyzed using LC-MS/MS. The samples extracted using UF 1 and UF 2 comprised 1161±8 and 1017±91 endogenous peptides, respectively. More than 70% peptide sequences in each sample extracted using UF 1 and UF 2 overlapped. The results revealed that endogenous peptides extracted using UF 1 and UF 2 showed similar characteristics. UF 1 yielded the highest number of peptides, whereas UF 3 extracted the least number of peptides at 366±18. The number of endogenous peptides extracted using PCPN 1 and PCPN 2 were 779±69 and 876±55, respectively. However, their characteristics were quite different, and only about 50% peptide sequences overlapped. The number of peptides extracted using OMC (549±151) was not remarkable compared with that using other methods. However, the isoelectric point (pI) and grand average of hydropathicity (GRAVY) of the peptides extracted using OMC were different from those extracted using other methods. This method presented no selectivity for the endogenous peptides with different pI and GRAVY and may be used to extract unique peptides from human milk. A total of 205 peptides were commonly identified in the samples using each of the six methods. The percent of shared peptides across the six samples ranged from 13% to 23%. The number of unique peptides in the samples extracted using UF 1 and UF 2 (226 and 228, respectively) were the highest among those extracted using the six methods. The results showed that all six methods could be used to extract endogenous peptides from these high-abundance precursor proteins. A total of 21, 38, and 19 peptides were extracted from lactotransferrin using UF 2, UF 3, and OMC, respectively, and the coverage rates of these peptides in lactotransferrin were 14%, 16%, and 19%, respectively. These three methods could extract the endogenous peptides from lactotransferrin in human milk, but PCPN 1 that has been commonly used in previous studies could not. The peptides from -casein, polymeric immunoglobulin receptor, osteopontia, -casein, -casein, and bile salt-activated lipase were identified in all samples extracted using the six methods. Moreover, these precursor proteins contributed 88% peptides in the samples extracted using the six methods. In conclusion, UF 1 and UF 2 were efficient procedures for extracting endogenous peptides from human milk. In addition, UF 2 could extract peptides from lactotransferrin, which is the optimum choice for extracting endogenous peptides from human milk. Additionally, the OMC enrichment method can be used to enrich and extract specific endogenous peptides from human milk. This study systematically compared the sample preparation methods commonly used in human milk endogenous peptidomics in recent years. The results provide strong support for uniform and standardized sample preparation methods. An ultrafiltration method without denaturation, which is more advantageous than the currently commonly used trichloroacetic acid precipitation method, was also established to prepare human milk endogenous peptide samples. In combination with OMC, this method can help in a more comprehensive and in-depth understanding of the endogenous peptidome of human milk.

摘要

人乳腺内的乳蛋白可释放出数百种内源性肽,其中一些具有多种生物活性功能。因此,研究人乳内源性肽对婴儿健康至关重要。基于液相色谱 - 串联质谱(LC-MS/MS)的肽组学已被用于研究人乳内源性肽。从人乳中提取内源性肽是使用LC-MS/MS分析人乳肽的必要且关键步骤。本研究旨在比较使用LC-MS/MS从人乳中提取内源性肽的方法。采用了超滤方法,包括不涉及变性的方法(UF 1)、涉及热变性的方法(UF 2)和涉及化学变性的方法(UF 3),使用三氯乙酸的沉淀方法(PCPN 1)和使用酒精的沉淀方法(PCPN 2),以及使用高度有序介孔碳(OMC)的富集方法从人乳中提取内源性肽。然后使用LC-MS/MS分析提取的内源性肽。使用UF 1和UF 2提取的样品分别包含1161±8和1017±91种内源性肽。使用UF 1和UF 2提取的每个样品中超过70%的肽序列重叠。结果表明,使用UF 1和UF 2提取的内源性肽具有相似的特征。UF 1产生的肽数量最多,而UF 3提取的肽数量最少,为366±18。使用PCPN 1和PCPN 2提取的内源性肽数量分别为779±69和876±55。然而,它们的特征差异很大,只有约50%的肽序列重叠。与使用其他方法相比,使用OMC提取的肽数量(549±151)并不显著。然而,使用OMC提取的肽的等电点(pI)和疏水总平均值(GRAVY)与使用其他方法提取的不同。该方法对具有不同pI和GRAVY的内源性肽没有选择性,可用于从人乳中提取独特的肽。使用六种方法中的每种方法在样品中总共鉴定出205种肽。六个样品中共享肽的百分比范围为13%至23%。使用UF 1和UF 提取的样品中的独特肽数量(分别为226和228)在六种提取方法中是最高的。结果表明,所有六种方法均可用于从这些高丰度前体蛋白中提取内源性肽。分别使用UF 2、UF 3和OMC从乳铁蛋白中提取了21、38和19种肽,这些肽在乳铁蛋白中的覆盖率分别为14%、16%和19%。这三种方法均可从人乳中的乳铁蛋白中提取内源性肽,但先前研究中常用的PCPN 1则不能。在使用六种方法提取的所有样品中均鉴定出了来自β-酪蛋白、多聚免疫球蛋白受体、骨桥蛋白、αs1-酪蛋白、αs2-酪蛋白和胆汁盐激活脂肪酶的肽。此外,这些前体蛋白在使用六种方法提取的样品中贡献了88%的肽。总之,UF 1和UF 2是从人乳中提取内源性肽的有效方法。此外,UF 2可从乳铁蛋白中提取肽,是从人乳中提取内源性肽的最佳选择。此外,OMC富集方法可用于从人乳中富集和提取特定的内源性肽。本研究系统地比较了近年来人乳内源性肽组学中常用的样品制备方法。结果为统一和标准化的样品制备方法提供了有力支持。还建立了一种比目前常用的三氯乙酸沉淀法更具优势的非变性超滤方法来制备人乳内源性肽样品。结合OMC,该方法有助于更全面、深入地了解人乳的内源性肽组。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d674/9403996/138ed18b6d83/cjc-39-05-463-img_1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验