• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

精细化研究血压变异性与心血管风险关联的决定因素:来自行动研究控制糖尿病心血管风险试验的结果。

Refining determinants of associations of visit-to-visit blood pressure variability with cardiovascular risk: results from the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes Trial.

机构信息

Phoenix VA Healthcare System, Phoenix.

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson.

出版信息

J Hypertens. 2021 Nov 1;39(11):2173-2182. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000002931.

DOI:10.1097/HJH.0000000000002931
PMID:34232160
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8500916/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

As there is uncertainty about the extent to which baseline blood pressure level or cardiovascular risk modifies the relationship between blood pressure variability (BPv) and cardiovascular disease, we comprehensively examined the role of BPv in cardiovascular disease risk in the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) Trial.

METHODS

Using data from ACCORD, we examined the relationship of BPv with development of the primary CVD outcome, major coronary heart disease (CHD), and total stroke using time-dependent Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

BPv was associated with the primary CVD outcome and major CHD but not stroke. The positive association with the primary CVD outcome and major CHD was more pronounced in low and high strata of baseline SBP (<120 and >140 mmHg) and DBP (<70 and >80 mmHg). The effect of BPv on CVD and CHD was more pronounced in those with both prior CVD history and low blood pressure. Dips, not elevations, in blood pressure appeared to drive these associations. The relationships were generally not attenuated by adjustment for mean blood pressure, medication adherence, or baseline comorbidities. A sensitivity analysis using CVD events from the long-term posttrial follow-up (ACCORDION) was consistent with the results from ACCORD.

CONCLUSION

In ACCORD, the effect of BPv on adverse cardiovascular (but not cerebrovascular) outcomes is modified by baseline blood pressure and prior CVD. Recognizing these more nuanced relationships may help improve risk stratification and blood pressure management decisions as well as provide insight into potential underlying mechanisms.

摘要

目的

由于基线血压水平或心血管风险在多大程度上改变血压变异性(BPV)与心血管疾病之间的关系尚不确定,我们全面检查了 BPV 在 ACCORD 试验中对心血管疾病风险的作用。

方法

使用来自 ACCORD 的数据,我们使用时间依赖性 Cox 比例风险模型检查了 BPV 与主要心血管疾病(CVD)结局、主要冠心病(CHD)和总卒中的发展之间的关系。

结果

BPV 与主要 CVD 结局和主要 CHD 相关,但与卒中无关。BPV 与主要 CVD 结局和主要 CHD 的正相关在基线 SBP(<120 和 >140mmHg)和 DBP(<70 和 >80mmHg)的低和高分层中更为明显。在有既往 CVD 病史和低血压的患者中,BPV 对 CVD 和 CHD 的影响更为明显。血压下降而非升高似乎导致了这些关联。这些关系在调整平均血压、药物依从性或基线合并症后并未减弱。来自长期随访后(ACCORDION)的 CVD 事件的敏感性分析与 ACCORD 的结果一致。

结论

在 ACCORD 中,BPV 对不良心血管(但非脑血管)结局的影响受基线血压和既往 CVD 的影响。认识到这些更细微的关系可能有助于改善风险分层和血压管理决策,并深入了解潜在的潜在机制。

相似文献

1
Refining determinants of associations of visit-to-visit blood pressure variability with cardiovascular risk: results from the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes Trial.精细化研究血压变异性与心血管风险关联的决定因素:来自行动研究控制糖尿病心血管风险试验的结果。
J Hypertens. 2021 Nov 1;39(11):2173-2182. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000002931.
2
Visit-to-visit SBP variability and cardiovascular disease in a multiethnic primary care setting: 10-year retrospective cohort study.多民族初级保健环境中就诊间收缩压变异性与心血管疾病:10年回顾性队列研究
J Hypertens. 2017 May;35 Suppl 1:S50-S56. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000001333.
3
Mobile phone-based interventions for improving adherence to medication prescribed for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in adults.基于手机的干预措施,用于提高成年人心血管疾病一级预防中所开药物的依从性。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 22;6(6):CD012675. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012675.pub2.
4
Outcomes in adults with systolic blood pressure between 130 and 139 mmHg in Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes Blood Pressure trial and Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial.在 ACTION 研究和 SBP 干预试验中,收缩压在 130 至 139mmHg 的成年人的结局。
J Hypertens. 2020 Aug;38(8):1567-1577. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000002437.
5
Visit-to-Visit Blood Pressure Variability and Arterial Stiffness Independently Predict Cardiovascular Risk Category in a General Population: Results from the SEPHAR II Study.动态血压变异性和动脉僵硬度独立预测普通人群心血管风险类别:来自 SEPHAR II 研究的结果。
Hellenic J Cardiol. 2015 May-Jun;56(3):208-16.
6
Intra-dialytic blood pressure variability is a greater predictor of cardiovascular events in hemodialysis patients.透析中血压变异性是血液透析患者心血管事件的更强预测因子。
BMC Nephrol. 2023 Apr 26;24(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s12882-023-03162-w.
7
Legacy benefits of blood pressure treatment on cardiovascular events are primarily mediated by improved blood pressure variability: the ASCOT trial.血压治疗对心血管事件的遗留益处主要通过改善血压变异性来介导:ASCOT 试验。
Eur Heart J. 2024 Apr 1;45(13):1159-1169. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad814.
8
[Association between long-term blood pressure change and the incidence of cardiovascular diseases: a population-based cohort study].长期血压变化与心血管疾病发病率之间的关联:一项基于人群的队列研究
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2018 Sep 24;46(9):695-700. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3758.2018.09.005.
9
Associations of blood pressure categories according to the 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association hypertension guideline and long-term blood pressure change with incident cardiovascular disease in middle-aged and elderly Chinese: the Dongfeng-Tongji cohort study.根据 2017 年美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会高血压指南的血压分类与长期血压变化与中国中老年人心血管疾病发病的关系:东风-同济队列研究。
J Hypertens. 2019 Oct;37(10):2007-2014. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000002137.
10
Visit-to-visit and ambulatory blood pressure variability as predictors of incident cardiovascular events in patients with hypertension.随访间和动态血压变异性作为高血压患者心血管事件发生的预测指标。
Am J Hypertens. 2012 Sep;25(9):962-8. doi: 10.1038/ajh.2012.75. Epub 2012 Jun 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Interdialytic blood pressure variability and all-cause mortality in patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis: a multicenter study using DialysisNet.维持性血液透析患者透析间期血压变异性与全因死亡率:一项使用DialysisNet的多中心研究
Clin Exp Nephrol. 2025 Apr 23. doi: 10.1007/s10157-025-02674-z.
2
Blood pressure variability and functional outcome after decompressive hemicraniectomy in malignant middle cerebral artery infarction.恶性大脑中动脉梗死减压性去骨瓣减压术后的血压变异性与功能转归
Eur J Neurol. 2025 Jan;32(1):e70021. doi: 10.1111/ene.70021.
3
Uncover visit-to-visit blood pressure variability as the hidden risk factor/predictor for coronary artery disease, stroke and malignant tumor in patients with type 2 diabetes.揭示就诊间血压变异性作为2型糖尿病患者冠状动脉疾病、中风和恶性肿瘤的潜在危险因素/预测指标。
Heliyon. 2024 Nov 16;10(22):e40406. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40406. eCollection 2024 Nov 30.
4
Blood pressure and its variability: classic and novel measurement techniques.血压及其变异性:经典和新型测量技术。
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2022 Oct;19(10):643-654. doi: 10.1038/s41569-022-00690-0. Epub 2022 Apr 19.
5
Baseline blood pressure modifies the role of blood pressure variability in mortality: Results from the ACCORD trial.基线血压改变了血压变异性在死亡率中的作用:ACCORD试验结果
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2022 May;24(5):951-955. doi: 10.1111/dom.14649. Epub 2022 Jan 24.

本文引用的文献

1
Systemic and cerebral circulatory adjustment within the first 60 s after active standing: An integrative physiological view.积极站立后 60 秒内的全身和脑循环调节:综合生理学观点。
Auton Neurosci. 2021 Mar;231:102756. doi: 10.1016/j.autneu.2020.102756. Epub 2020 Dec 10.
2
Long-term glucose variability and risk of nephropathy complication in UKPDS, ACCORD and VADT trials.英国前瞻性糖尿病研究(UKPDS)、控制糖尿病患者心血管风险行动(ACCORD)及糖尿病干预和并发症研究(VADT)试验中,长期血糖变异性与肾病并发症风险
Diabetologia. 2020 Nov;63(11):2482-2485. doi: 10.1007/s00125-020-05273-7. Epub 2020 Sep 21.
3
How important is blood pressure variability?血压变异性有多重要?
Eur Heart J Suppl. 2020 Jun;22(Suppl E):E1-E6. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/suaa061. Epub 2020 Apr 6.
4
Blood Pressure Variability and Risk of Heart Failure in ACCORD and the VADT.血压变异性与 ACCORD 和 VADT 中的心力衰竭风险。
Diabetes Care. 2020 Jul;43(7):1471-1478. doi: 10.2337/dc19-2540. Epub 2020 Apr 23.
5
Association Between Visit-to-Visit Blood Pressure Variability in Early Adulthood and Myocardial Structure and Function in Later Life.成年早期血压变异性与晚年心肌结构和功能的关系。
JAMA Cardiol. 2020 Jul 1;5(7):795-801. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.0799.
6
Association between blood pressure variability, cardiovascular disease and mortality in type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.血压变异性与 2 型糖尿病患者心血管疾病和死亡的关系:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2019 Dec;21(12):2587-2598. doi: 10.1111/dom.13828. Epub 2019 Aug 9.
7
Glycaemic variation is a predictor of all-cause mortality in the Veteran Affairs Diabetes Trial.在退伍军人事务部糖尿病试验中,血糖变异性是全因死亡率的一个预测指标。
Diab Vasc Dis Res. 2019 Mar;16(2):178-185. doi: 10.1177/1479164119827598.
8
Trends in end digit preference for blood pressure and associations with cardiovascular outcomes in Canadian and UK primary care: a retrospective observational study.加拿大和英国初级保健中血压尾数偏好的趋势及其与心血管结局的关联:一项回顾性观察研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jan 24;9(1):e024970. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024970.
9
Blood pressure variability and risk of cardiovascular event: is it appropriate to use the future for predicting the present?血压变异性与心血管事件风险:用未来预测当下是否合适?
Eur Heart J. 2018 Dec 14;39(47):4220. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy825.
10
Blood pressure and the uncertainty of prediction using hazard ratio.血压与使用风险比进行预测的不确定性。
Eur Heart J. 2018 Dec 14;39(47):4219. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy595.