Suppr超能文献

精细化研究血压变异性与心血管风险关联的决定因素:来自行动研究控制糖尿病心血管风险试验的结果。

Refining determinants of associations of visit-to-visit blood pressure variability with cardiovascular risk: results from the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes Trial.

机构信息

Phoenix VA Healthcare System, Phoenix.

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson.

出版信息

J Hypertens. 2021 Nov 1;39(11):2173-2182. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000002931.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

As there is uncertainty about the extent to which baseline blood pressure level or cardiovascular risk modifies the relationship between blood pressure variability (BPv) and cardiovascular disease, we comprehensively examined the role of BPv in cardiovascular disease risk in the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) Trial.

METHODS

Using data from ACCORD, we examined the relationship of BPv with development of the primary CVD outcome, major coronary heart disease (CHD), and total stroke using time-dependent Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

BPv was associated with the primary CVD outcome and major CHD but not stroke. The positive association with the primary CVD outcome and major CHD was more pronounced in low and high strata of baseline SBP (<120 and >140 mmHg) and DBP (<70 and >80 mmHg). The effect of BPv on CVD and CHD was more pronounced in those with both prior CVD history and low blood pressure. Dips, not elevations, in blood pressure appeared to drive these associations. The relationships were generally not attenuated by adjustment for mean blood pressure, medication adherence, or baseline comorbidities. A sensitivity analysis using CVD events from the long-term posttrial follow-up (ACCORDION) was consistent with the results from ACCORD.

CONCLUSION

In ACCORD, the effect of BPv on adverse cardiovascular (but not cerebrovascular) outcomes is modified by baseline blood pressure and prior CVD. Recognizing these more nuanced relationships may help improve risk stratification and blood pressure management decisions as well as provide insight into potential underlying mechanisms.

摘要

目的

由于基线血压水平或心血管风险在多大程度上改变血压变异性(BPV)与心血管疾病之间的关系尚不确定,我们全面检查了 BPV 在 ACCORD 试验中对心血管疾病风险的作用。

方法

使用来自 ACCORD 的数据,我们使用时间依赖性 Cox 比例风险模型检查了 BPV 与主要心血管疾病(CVD)结局、主要冠心病(CHD)和总卒中的发展之间的关系。

结果

BPV 与主要 CVD 结局和主要 CHD 相关,但与卒中无关。BPV 与主要 CVD 结局和主要 CHD 的正相关在基线 SBP(<120 和 >140mmHg)和 DBP(<70 和 >80mmHg)的低和高分层中更为明显。在有既往 CVD 病史和低血压的患者中,BPV 对 CVD 和 CHD 的影响更为明显。血压下降而非升高似乎导致了这些关联。这些关系在调整平均血压、药物依从性或基线合并症后并未减弱。来自长期随访后(ACCORDION)的 CVD 事件的敏感性分析与 ACCORD 的结果一致。

结论

在 ACCORD 中,BPV 对不良心血管(但非脑血管)结局的影响受基线血压和既往 CVD 的影响。认识到这些更细微的关系可能有助于改善风险分层和血压管理决策,并深入了解潜在的潜在机制。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

4
Blood pressure and its variability: classic and novel measurement techniques.血压及其变异性:经典和新型测量技术。
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2022 Oct;19(10):643-654. doi: 10.1038/s41569-022-00690-0. Epub 2022 Apr 19.

本文引用的文献

3
How important is blood pressure variability?血压变异性有多重要?
Eur Heart J Suppl. 2020 Jun;22(Suppl E):E1-E6. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/suaa061. Epub 2020 Apr 6.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验