Lawrence Cassandra, Lazarus Mark, Abboud Joseph, Williams Gerald, Namdari Surena
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Institute-Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.
Joints. 2021 Jun 18;7(4):159-164. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1730982. eCollection 2019 Dec.
Compared with anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA), reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) is associated with lower preoperative and postoperative outcome scores and range of motion. It is unknown whether patients' preoperative expectations of surgery are lower in RTSA compared with aTSA. The purpose of this study was to assess preoperative patient expectations and postoperative outcomes in aTSA and RTSA. A consecutive series of patients undergoing primary aTSA for diagnosis of osteoarthritis or primary RTSA for diagnosis of rotator cuff tear arthropathy were studied prospectively. Expectations were evaluated using the validated Hospital for Special Surgery's Shoulder Surgery Expectations Survey. Baseline demographics, comorbidities, and social factors were collected. Baseline and 2 years postoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, visual analog scale pain, Single Assessment Number Evaluation (SANE), and patient satisfaction were obtained. There were 128 patients (64 aTSA and 64 RTSA). There was no significant difference in total preoperative expectations score between groups. On multivariate linear regression analysis, aTSA ( = 0.024) and younger age ( = 0.018) were associated with higher expectations for improved ability to exercise. Changes in preoperative to postoperative ASES ( = 0.004) and SANE ( = 0.001) scores were higher in the aTSA group. Total preoperative expectations score was not correlated with postoperative functional outcomes or satisfaction in either group. In the aTSA group, expectations for participation in exercise were positively correlated with changes in preoperative to postoperative ASES score ( = 0.01) and SANE score ( = 0.01). Though patients undergoing primary aTSA demonstrated greater improvement in functional outcome than those undergoing primary RTSA, both groups reported similar aggregate preoperative expectations. Those undergoing aTSA had higher expectations for return to exercise which was positively correlated with postoperative functional outcomes. Level II, prospective cohort study.
与解剖型全肩关节置换术(aTSA)相比,反置全肩关节置换术(RTSA)的术前和术后结果评分以及活动范围较低。与aTSA相比,RTSA患者术前对手术的期望是否较低尚不清楚。本研究的目的是评估aTSA和RTSA患者的术前期望和术后结果。 对一系列连续接受原发性aTSA治疗骨关节炎或原发性RTSA治疗肩袖撕裂关节病的患者进行前瞻性研究。使用经过验证的特种外科医院肩部手术期望调查问卷评估期望。收集基线人口统计学、合并症和社会因素。获得基线和术后2年的美国肩肘外科医生(ASES)评分、视觉模拟量表疼痛评分、单一评估数字评价(SANE)和患者满意度。 共有128例患者(64例aTSA和64例RTSA)。两组术前总期望评分无显著差异。多变量线性回归分析显示,aTSA( = 0.024)和年龄较小( = 0.018)与对运动能力改善的更高期望相关。aTSA组术前至术后ASES( = 0.004)和SANE( = 0.001)评分的变化更高。两组术前总期望评分均与术后功能结果或满意度无关。在aTSA组中,参与运动的期望与术前至术后ASES评分( = 0.01)和SANE评分( = 0.01)的变化呈正相关。 虽然接受原发性aTSA的患者在功能结果方面比接受原发性RTSA的患者有更大改善,但两组报告的术前总期望相似。接受aTSA的患者对恢复运动有更高期望,这与术后功能结果呈正相关。 二级前瞻性队列研究。