• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Online patients questions regarding reverse total shoulder arthroplasty pertain to timeline of recovery, specific activities, and limitations.在线患者关于反式全肩关节置换术的问题涉及恢复时间线、特定活动及限制。
JSES Rev Rep Tech. 2024 Oct 19;5(1):7-13. doi: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2024.09.005. eCollection 2025 Feb.
2
What are our patients asking Google about acromioclavicular joint injuries?-frequently asked online questions and the quality of online resources.我们的患者在谷歌上询问了哪些关于肩锁关节损伤的问题?——常见的在线问题及在线资源质量
JSES Rev Rep Tech. 2024 Feb 27;4(2):175-181. doi: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2024.02.001. eCollection 2024 May.
3
Patients With Posterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries Obtain Information Regarding Diagnosis, Management, and Recovery from Low-Quality Online Resources.后交叉韧带损伤患者从低质量的在线资源中获取关于诊断、治疗和康复的信息。
Phys Sportsmed. 2024 Dec;52(6):601-607. doi: 10.1080/00913847.2024.2346462. Epub 2024 Apr 26.
4
Internet search analytics for shoulder arthroplasty: what questions are patients asking?肩关节置换术的互联网搜索分析:患者都在问哪些问题?
Clin Shoulder Elb. 2023 Mar;26(1):55-63. doi: 10.5397/cise.2022.01347. Epub 2023 Feb 23.
5
What are patients asking and reading online? An analysis of online patient searches for rotator cuff repair.患者在网上询问和阅读的内容是什么?对在线患者搜索肩袖修复的分析。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2023 Nov;32(11):2245-2255. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.04.021. Epub 2023 May 30.
6
Patients With Femoroacetabular Impingement Obtain Information From Low-Quality Sources Online and Are Most Interested in Conservative Treatment and Expected Recovery.股骨髋臼撞击症患者从网上低质量来源获取信息,且对保守治疗和预期康复最感兴趣。
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2022 Dec 15;5(1):e21-e27. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2022.09.011. eCollection 2023 Feb.
7
Characteristics and Quality of Online Searches for Direct Anterior Versus Posterior Approach for Total Hip Arthroplasty.直接前入路与后入路全髋关节置换术的在线搜索特征和质量。
J Arthroplasty. 2024 Sep;39(9):2329-2335.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.03.048. Epub 2024 Apr 4.
8
What Do Patients Encounter When Searching Online About Meniscal Surgery? An Analysis of Internet Trends.患者在网上搜索半月板手术时会遇到什么?互联网趋势分析。
Orthop J Sports Med. 2024 Jan 24;12(1):23259671231219014. doi: 10.1177/23259671231219014. eCollection 2024 Jan.
9
Rotator cuff repair: what questions are patients asking online and where are they getting their answers?肩袖修复术:患者在网上问哪些问题,他们从哪里获得答案?
Clin Shoulder Elb. 2023 Mar;26(1):25-31. doi: 10.5397/cise.2022.01235. Epub 2023 Feb 23.
10
Modern Internet Search Analytics and Osseointegration: What are Patients Asking and Reading Online?现代互联网搜索分析与骨整合:患者在网上询问和阅读的内容是什么?
Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr. 2023 Sep-Dec;18(3):163-168. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10080-1603.

本文引用的文献

1
What are our patients asking Google about acromioclavicular joint injuries?-frequently asked online questions and the quality of online resources.我们的患者在谷歌上询问了哪些关于肩锁关节损伤的问题?——常见的在线问题及在线资源质量
JSES Rev Rep Tech. 2024 Feb 27;4(2):175-181. doi: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2024.02.001. eCollection 2024 May.
2
Patients With Posterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries Obtain Information Regarding Diagnosis, Management, and Recovery from Low-Quality Online Resources.后交叉韧带损伤患者从低质量的在线资源中获取关于诊断、治疗和康复的信息。
Phys Sportsmed. 2024 Dec;52(6):601-607. doi: 10.1080/00913847.2024.2346462. Epub 2024 Apr 26.
3
Evaluating the Reliability of YouTube as a Source of Information for Meniscal Ramp Lesions.评估YouTube作为半月板斜韧带损伤信息来源的可靠性。
Orthop J Sports Med. 2024 Jan 3;12(1):23259671231219815. doi: 10.1177/23259671231219815. eCollection 2024 Jan.
4
Quality of YouTube Videos Regarding Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Quadriceps Tendon Autograft Is Unsatisfactory.关于使用股四头肌肌腱自体移植物重建前交叉韧带的 YouTube 视频质量不尽如人意。
Arthroscopy. 2024 Aug;40(8):2236-2243. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2024.01.002. Epub 2024 Jan 6.
5
Return to Sports Activity After Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.反式全肩关节置换术后恢复体育活动
Orthop J Sports Med. 2023 Nov 28;11(11):23259671231208959. doi: 10.1177/23259671231208959. eCollection 2023 Nov.
6
Volume, indications, and number of surgeons performing reverse total shoulder arthroplasty continue to expand: a nationwide cohort analysis from 2016-2020.进行反式全肩关节置换术的手术量、适应证及外科医生数量持续增加:一项2016 - 2020年的全国队列分析。
JSES Int. 2023 May 25;7(5):827-834. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2023.05.002. eCollection 2023 Sep.
7
What are patients asking and reading online? An analysis of online patient searches for rotator cuff repair.患者在网上询问和阅读的内容是什么?对在线患者搜索肩袖修复的分析。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2023 Nov;32(11):2245-2255. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.04.021. Epub 2023 May 30.
8
Patients With Femoroacetabular Impingement Obtain Information From Low-Quality Sources Online and Are Most Interested in Conservative Treatment and Expected Recovery.股骨髋臼撞击症患者从网上低质量来源获取信息,且对保守治疗和预期康复最感兴趣。
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2022 Dec 15;5(1):e21-e27. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2022.09.011. eCollection 2023 Feb.
9
[The role of the Internet as a source of medical information for orthopedic patients].[互联网作为骨科患者医学信息来源的作用]
Orthopadie (Heidelb). 2022 Jul;51(7):521-530. doi: 10.1007/s00132-022-04238-5. Epub 2022 Mar 29.
10
Prospective Comparative Study of Preoperative Expectations and Postoperative Outcomes in Anatomic and Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty.解剖型与反置式肩关节置换术术前期望与术后结果的前瞻性对照研究
Joints. 2021 Jun 18;7(4):159-164. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1730982. eCollection 2019 Dec.

在线患者关于反式全肩关节置换术的问题涉及恢复时间线、特定活动及限制。

Online patients questions regarding reverse total shoulder arthroplasty pertain to timeline of recovery, specific activities, and limitations.

作者信息

Obana Kyle K, Lind Dane R G, Luzzi Andrew J, O'Connor Michaela J, LeVasseur Matthew R, Levine William N

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, New York-Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.

Center for Regenerative and Personalized Medicine, Steadman Philippon Research Institute, Vail, CO, USA.

出版信息

JSES Rev Rep Tech. 2024 Oct 19;5(1):7-13. doi: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2024.09.005. eCollection 2025 Feb.

DOI:10.1016/j.xrrt.2024.09.005
PMID:39872341
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11764610/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) demonstrates favorable long-term data and has outpaced anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty and hemiarthroplasty as the most-performed shoulder arthroplasty procedure. As indications and outcomes continue to favor rTSA, patients may turn to the internet as an efficient modality to answer various questions or concerns. This study investigates online patient questions pertaining to rTSA and the quality of the websites providing information.

HYPOTHESES

(1) Questions will pertain to surgical indications, timeline of recovery, and postoperative restrictions; (2) the quality and transparency of online information is largely heterogenous.

METHODS

Three rTSA searches were entered into the Google Web Search. Questions under the "People also ask" tab were expanded sequentially and 100 consecutive results for each query were included for analysis (300 in total). Questions were categorized based on Rothwell's Classification and subcategorized by topic. Websites were categorized by source. Website quality was evaluated by the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) Benchmark Criteria.

RESULTS

Most questions fell into the Rothwell Fact category (49.7%). The most common question topics were Timeline of Recovery (17.3%), Specific Activities (14.7%), and Restrictions (11.3%). The least common question topics were Anatomy/Function (0.0%), Cost (0.3%), and Diagnoses/Evaluation (0.3%). The most common websites were Medical Practice (45.0%), Academic (22.3%), and Single Surgeon (12.3%). PubMed articles consisted of 41.2% of Government websites. The average JAMA score for all websites was 1.48 ± 1.27. Government websites had the highest JAMA score (3.11 ± 1.01) and constituted 55.9% of all websites with a score of 4/4. Medical Practice websites had the lowest JAMA score (0.99 ± 0.91).

CONCLUSION

Patients are interested in the timeline of recovery, ability to perform specific activities after surgery, and short-term and long-term restrictions following rTSA. Although all patients will benefit from education on ways to perform activities of daily living while abiding by postoperative restrictions, physicians should set preoperative expectations regarding return-to-activity following rTSA in younger, more active patients. Finally, surgeons should provide patients with physical booklets and online information available on their websites to avoid reliance on low-quality online sources.

摘要

背景

反向全肩关节置换术(rTSA)显示出良好的长期数据,并且作为最常施行的肩关节置换手术,其发展速度已超过解剖型全肩关节置换术和半肩关节置换术。随着适应症和治疗效果持续支持rTSA,患者可能会转向互联网,将其作为一种高效的方式来解答各种疑问或担忧。本研究调查了与rTSA相关的在线患者问题以及提供信息的网站质量。

假设

(1)问题将涉及手术适应症、恢复时间线和术后限制;(2)在线信息的质量和透明度在很大程度上存在异质性。

方法

在谷歌网络搜索中输入三次rTSA搜索。依次展开“人们也问”标签下的问题,并纳入每个查询的100个连续结果进行分析(共300个)。问题根据罗斯韦尔分类法进行分类,并按主题进行子分类。网站按来源进行分类。网站质量由美国医学会(JAMA)基准标准进行评估。

结果

大多数问题属于罗斯韦尔事实类别(49.7%)。最常见的问题主题是恢复时间线(17.3%)、特定活动(14.7%)和限制(11.3%)。最不常见的问题主题是解剖学/功能(0.0%)、费用(0.3%)和诊断/评估(0.3%)。最常见的网站类型是医疗实践网站(45.0%)、学术网站(22.3%)和单医生网站(12.3%)。政府网站中的PubMed文章占41.2%。所有网站的平均JAMA评分为1.48±1.27。政府网站的JAMA评分最高(3.11±1.01),在所有得分为4/4的网站中占55.9%。医疗实践网站的JAMA评分最低(0.99±0.91)。

结论

患者对rTSA后的恢复时间线、术后进行特定活动的能力以及短期和长期限制感兴趣。虽然所有患者都将从关于在遵守术后限制的同时进行日常生活活动的方法的教育中受益,但医生应该对年轻、活动量较大的患者在rTSA后的恢复活动设定术前预期。最后,外科医生应该为患者提供实体手册以及其网站上的在线信息,以避免患者依赖低质量的在线资源。