• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

有哪些方法可以控制临床试验中的安慰剂效应?一篇叙述性综述。

What can be done to control the placebo response in clinical trials? A narrative review.

机构信息

WCG Analgesic Solutions, Wayland, MA, United States of America.

University of Maryland, School of Nursing & School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.

出版信息

Contemp Clin Trials. 2021 Aug;107:106503. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2021.106503. Epub 2021 Jul 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.cct.2021.106503
PMID:34237458
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8719632/
Abstract

The desire to reduce high placebo response rates in clinical trials is a popular concept. However, few studies have rigorously examined the effectiveness of methods to control for placebo responses that are relevant to randomized controlled trials. The primary objective of this review was to evaluate the effect of experimental placebo manipulations in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We critically reviewed studies designed to manipulate placebo responses including positive expectations regarding the effectiveness of the placebo treatment, manipulating the time spent with subjects, and training study staff and subjects to accurately report symptom severity. These efforts have generally resulted in reduced placebo response and improved discrimination between drug and placebo. Interventions that neutralize staff and subject expectations and improve the ability of subjects to accurately report symptom severity have shown the most promise. Reduction of the placebo response has the potential to accelerate the development of new therapeutics.

摘要

减少临床试验中高安慰剂反应率的愿望是一个流行的概念。然而,很少有研究严格检查控制与随机对照试验相关的安慰剂反应的方法的有效性。本综述的主要目的是评估随机对照试验(RCT)中实验性安慰剂操作的效果。我们批判性地回顾了旨在操纵安慰剂反应的研究,包括对安慰剂治疗效果的积极期望、操纵与受试者在一起的时间,以及培训研究人员和受试者准确报告症状严重程度。这些努力通常导致安慰剂反应减少,药物和安慰剂之间的区分度提高。中和工作人员和受试者期望并提高受试者准确报告症状严重程度的能力的干预措施显示出最大的希望。降低安慰剂反应有可能加速新疗法的开发。

相似文献

1
What can be done to control the placebo response in clinical trials? A narrative review.有哪些方法可以控制临床试验中的安慰剂效应?一篇叙述性综述。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2021 Aug;107:106503. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2021.106503. Epub 2021 Jul 6.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Selective progesterone receptor modulators (SPRMs) for uterine fibroids.用于子宫肌瘤的选择性孕激素受体调节剂(SPRMs)
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 26;4(4):CD010770. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010770.pub2.
4
Placebo Response Reduction and Accurate Pain Reporting Training Reduces Placebo Responses in a Clinical Trial on Chronic Low Back Pain: Results From a Comparison to the Literature.安慰剂反应减少和准确疼痛报告训练可减少慢性下背痛临床试验中的安慰剂反应:与文献比较的结果。
Clin J Pain. 2020 Dec;36(12):950-954. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000873.
5
6
Systematic review: The placebo effect of psychological interventions in the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome.系统评价:心理干预对肠易激综合征治疗的安慰剂效应
World J Gastroenterol. 2017 Mar 28;23(12):2223-2233. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i12.2223.
7
8
Can insights from placebo and nocebo mechanisms studies improve the randomized controlled trial?安慰剂和反安慰剂机制研究的启示能否改善随机对照试验?
Scand J Pain. 2020 Jul 28;20(3):451-467. doi: 10.1515/sjpain-2019-0183.
9
Drug-Placebo Additivity in Randomized Clinical Trials.随机临床试验中的药物-安慰剂相加性。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2019 Dec;106(6):1191-1197. doi: 10.1002/cpt.1626. Epub 2019 Oct 26.
10
Can knowledge of Placebo and Nocebo Mechanisms Help Improve Randomized Clinical Trials?安慰剂和反安慰剂机制的知识能否帮助改善随机临床试验?
Int Rev Neurobiol. 2018;138:329-357. doi: 10.1016/bs.irn.2018.01.012. Epub 2018 Mar 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Vagus nerve stimulation as a potential treatment for acute asthmatic bronchoconstriction: a systematic review.迷走神经刺激作为急性哮喘性支气管收缩的潜在治疗方法:一项系统评价
Front Physiol. 2025 Aug 13;16:1625871. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2025.1625871. eCollection 2025.
2
Dispositional Optimism Predicts Antidepressant Treatment Response in Major Depressive Disorder: Potential Relevance for Positive Psychology Interventions.气质性乐观预测重度抑郁症的抗抑郁治疗反应:对积极心理学干预的潜在意义。
J Posit Psychol. 2024 Nov 14. doi: 10.1080/17439760.2024.2427577.
3
Justice for Placebo: Placebo Effect in Clinical Trials and Everyday Practice.

本文引用的文献

1
Placebo Response Reduction and Accurate Pain Reporting Training Reduces Placebo Responses in a Clinical Trial on Chronic Low Back Pain: Results From a Comparison to the Literature.安慰剂反应减少和准确疼痛报告训练可减少慢性下背痛临床试验中的安慰剂反应:与文献比较的结果。
Clin J Pain. 2020 Dec;36(12):950-954. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000873.
2
Placebo and Nocebo Effects.安慰剂和反安慰剂效应。
N Engl J Med. 2020 Feb 6;382(6):554-561. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1907805.
3
A deeper look at pain variability and its relationship with the placebo response: results from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial of naproxen in osteoarthritis of the knee.
安慰剂的公平性:临床试验和日常医疗实践中的安慰剂效应
Medicines (Basel). 2025 Feb 24;12(1):5. doi: 10.3390/medicines12010005.
4
Relationship between pruritus and sleep in participants with primary biliary cholangitis in the Phase 2b GLIMMER trial.在 2b 期 GLIMMER 试验中原发性胆汁性胆管炎参与者中瘙痒与睡眠的关系。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2024 Jun 12;8(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s41687-024-00722-y.
5
Hype or hope? High placebo response in major depression treatment with ketamine and esketamine: a systematic review and meta-analysis.炒作还是希望?氯胺酮和艾氯胺酮治疗重度抑郁症时的高安慰剂反应:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Mar 8;15:1346697. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1346697. eCollection 2024.
6
Short-Term Cannabidiol with Δ-9-Tetrahydrocannabinol in Parkinson's Disease: A Randomized Trial.短期联合使用大麻二酚和 Δ-9-四氢大麻酚治疗帕金森病:一项随机试验。
Mov Disord. 2024 May;39(5):863-875. doi: 10.1002/mds.29768. Epub 2024 Mar 15.
7
A Mini Review of the Impact of Baseline Disease Severity on Clinical Outcomes: Should We Compare Atopic Dermatitis Clinical Trials?基线疾病严重程度对临床结局影响的小型综述:我们应该比较特应性皮炎临床试验吗?
Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2023 Dec;13(12):3019-3029. doi: 10.1007/s13555-023-01052-5. Epub 2023 Nov 2.
8
Conscious connected breathing with breath retention intervention in adults with chronic low back pain: protocol for a randomized controlled pilot study.成人慢性下腰痛患者意识连贯呼吸与屏气干预:一项随机对照试验性研究方案
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2023 Jan 24;9(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s40814-023-01247-9.
9
Seventy Years of Antipsychotic Development: A Critical Review.抗精神病药物研发七十年:批判性综述
Biomedicines. 2023 Jan 4;11(1):130. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11010130.
10
Great Expectations: recommendations for improving the methodological rigor of psychedelic clinical trials.高期望:改善迷幻药临床试验方法严谨性的建议。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2022 Jun;239(6):1989-2010. doi: 10.1007/s00213-022-06123-7. Epub 2022 Apr 1.
深入探讨疼痛变异性及其与安慰剂反应的关系:来自萘普生治疗膝骨关节炎的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照临床试验的结果。
Pain. 2019 Jul;160(7):1522-1528. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001538.
4
The Placebo Effect in Pain Therapies.疼痛治疗中的安慰剂效应。
Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2019 Jan 6;59:191-211. doi: 10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-010818-021542. Epub 2018 Sep 14.
5
Implications of Placebo and Nocebo Effects for Clinical Practice: Expert Consensus.安慰剂和反安慰剂效应对临床实践的影响:专家共识。
Psychother Psychosom. 2018;87(4):204-210. doi: 10.1159/000490354. Epub 2018 Jun 12.
6
Accurate pain reporting training diminishes the placebo response: Results from a randomised, double-blind, crossover trial.准确的疼痛报告训练可降低安慰剂反应:一项随机、双盲、交叉试验的结果。
PLoS One. 2018 May 24;13(5):e0197844. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197844. eCollection 2018.
7
Development and preliminary validation of the focused analgesia selection test to identify accurate pain reporters.用于识别准确疼痛报告者的聚焦镇痛选择测试的开发与初步验证。
J Pain Res. 2017 Feb 9;10:319-326. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S121455. eCollection 2017.
8
Increasing uncertainty in CNS clinical trials: the role of placebo, nocebo, and Hawthorne effects.中枢神经系统临床试验中的不确定性增加:安慰剂、反安慰剂和霍桑效应的作用。
Lancet Neurol. 2016 Jun;15(7):736-747. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(16)00066-1. Epub 2016 Apr 19.
9
Patient-Provider Interactions Affect Symptoms in Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Pilot Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial.医患互动对胃食管反流病症状的影响:一项初步随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 30;10(9):e0136855. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136855. eCollection 2015.
10
Vasopressin Boosts Placebo Analgesic Effects in Women: A Randomized Trial.血管加压素增强女性安慰剂镇痛效果:一项随机试验
Biol Psychiatry. 2016 May 15;79(10):794-802. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2015.07.019. Epub 2015 Aug 4.