• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Metrics of shock in pediatric trauma patients: A systematic search and review.儿童创伤患者休克的评估指标:系统检索与综述。
Injury. 2021 Oct;52(10):3166-3172. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2021.06.014. Epub 2021 Jun 24.
2
Comparison of Prehospital Calculated Age-Adjusted Pediatric Shock Index (SIPA) to Those Calculated in the ED for Identifying Trauma Patients That Needed the Highest-Level Activation Based on Consensus Criteria.比较院前计算的年龄校正小儿休克指数(SIPA)与在 ED 计算的那些根据共识标准识别需要最高级别激活的创伤患者的 SIPA。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2020 Nov-Dec;24(6):778-782. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2020.1718812. Epub 2020 Feb 10.
3
Pediatric specific shock index accurately identifies severely injured children.儿科专用休克指数能准确识别重伤儿童。
J Pediatr Surg. 2015 Feb;50(2):331-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2014.08.009. Epub 2014 Oct 1.
4
Predicting severe outcomes in pediatric trauma patients: Shock index pediatric age-adjusted vs. age-adjusted tachycardia.预测儿科创伤患者的严重结局:休克指数儿科年龄校正与年龄校正心动过速。
Am J Emerg Med. 2024 Sep;83:59-63. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2024.06.041. Epub 2024 Jul 1.
5
Predictive value of the shock index (SI) compared to the age-adjusted pediatric shock index (SIPA) for identifying children that needed the highest-level trauma activation based on the presence of consensus criteria.休克指数(SI)与年龄校正后小儿休克指数(SIPA)对根据共识标准确定需要最高级别创伤激活的儿童的预测价值比较。
J Pediatr Surg. 2020 Sep;55(9):1761-1765. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2019.09.032. Epub 2019 Oct 24.
6
Derivation and validation of an improved pediatric shock index for predicting need for early intervention and outcomes in pediatric trauma.改良小儿休克指数在预测小儿创伤早期干预需求及预后中的推导和验证。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2022 Oct 1;93(4):474-481. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003727. Epub 2022 Jun 24.
7
Improved identification of severely injured pediatric trauma patients using reverse shock index multiplied by Glasgow Coma Scale.应用反向休克指数乘以格拉斯哥昏迷评分提高严重创伤患儿的识别能力。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2022 Jan 1;92(1):69-73. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003432.
8
Shock index and shock index, pediatric age-adjusted as predictors of mortality in pediatric patients with trauma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.休克指数和儿科年龄校正休克指数作为创伤性儿科患者死亡率的预测指标:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 18;19(7):e0307367. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307367. eCollection 2024.
9
Pre-hospital and emergency department shock index pediatric age-adjusted (SIPA) "cut points" to identify pediatric trauma patients at risk for massive transfusion and/or mortality.院前和急诊科休克指数儿科校正(SIPA)“切点”,以识别有大量输血和/或死亡风险的儿科创伤患者。
J Pediatr Surg. 2022 Feb;57(2):302-307. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2021.09.053. Epub 2021 Oct 9.
10
Prospective validation of the shock index pediatric-adjusted (SIPA) in blunt liver and spleen trauma: An ATOMAC+ study.小儿钝性肝脾创伤中休克指数儿科调整版(SIPA)的前瞻性验证:一项ATOMAC+研究。
J Pediatr Surg. 2017 Feb;52(2):340-344. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.09.060. Epub 2016 Sep 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Performance of the Paediatric Trauma Score on survival prediction of injured children at a major trauma centre: A retrospective Colombian cohort, 2011-2019.儿科创伤评分对一家大型创伤中心受伤儿童生存预测的性能:一项2011 - 2019年哥伦比亚回顾性队列研究
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2022 Jun 29;13:100312. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2022.100312. eCollection 2022 Sep.

本文引用的文献

1
Timing and volume of crystalloid and blood products in pediatric trauma: An Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma multicenter prospective observational study.小儿创伤中晶体和血制品的时机和容量:东部创伤外科学会多中心前瞻性观察研究。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2020 Jul;89(1):36-42. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002702.
2
Utilization of age-adjusted shock index in a resource-strained setting.资源有限环境下应用校正年龄休克指数。
J Pediatr Surg. 2019 Dec;54(12):2621-2626. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2019.08.021. Epub 2019 Aug 30.
3
Age-adjusted shock index: From injury to arrival.年龄校正休克指数:从受伤到抵达。
J Pediatr Surg. 2019 May;54(5):984-988. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2019.01.049. Epub 2019 Feb 27.
4
Trends in pediatric-adjusted shock index predict morbidity in children with moderate blunt injuries.小儿校正休克指数的趋势可预测中度钝性损伤儿童的发病率。
Pediatr Surg Int. 2019 Jul;35(7):785-791. doi: 10.1007/s00383-019-04469-2. Epub 2019 Mar 20.
5
Shock Index as a Predictor of Morbidity and Mortality in Pediatric Trauma Patients.休克指数作为儿童创伤患者发病率和死亡率的预测指标
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2019 Feb;35(2):132-137. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000001733.
6
The value of vital sign trends in predicting and monitoring clinical deterioration: A systematic review.生命体征趋势在预测和监测临床恶化中的价值:系统评价。
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 15;14(1):e0210875. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210875. eCollection 2019.
7
Blood Pressure Thresholds and Mortality in Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury.儿童创伤性脑损伤的血压阈值与死亡率。
Pediatrics. 2018 Aug;142(2). doi: 10.1542/peds.2018-0594.
8
Severely Elevated Blood Pressure and Early Mortality in Children with Traumatic Brain Injuries: The Neglected End of the Spectrum.严重高血压与创伤性脑损伤儿童的早期死亡率:被忽视的谱系末端。
West J Emerg Med. 2018 May;19(3):452-459. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2018.2.36404. Epub 2018 Apr 5.
9
Multicenter study of crystalloid boluses and transfusion in pediatric trauma-When to go to blood?小儿创伤晶胶复苏与输血的多中心研究-何时输血?
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2018 Jul;85(1):108-112. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001897.
10
Too little too late: Hypotension and blood transfusion in the trauma bay are independent predictors of death in injured children.为时过晚:创伤区低血压和输血是创伤儿童死亡的独立预测因子。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2018 Oct;85(4):674-678. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001823.

儿童创伤患者休克的评估指标:系统检索与综述。

Metrics of shock in pediatric trauma patients: A systematic search and review.

机构信息

Division of Trauma and Burn Surgery, Children's National Hospital, Washington D.C., United States.

Department of Pediatrics, Children's National Hospital, Washington D.C., United States.

出版信息

Injury. 2021 Oct;52(10):3166-3172. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2021.06.014. Epub 2021 Jun 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.injury.2021.06.014
PMID:34238538
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8560576/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Shock-index (SI) and systolic blood pressure (SBP) are metrics for identifying children and adults with hemodynamic instability following injury. The purpose of this systematic review was to assess the quality of these metrics as predictors of outcomes following pediatric injury.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a literature search in Pubmed, SCOPUS, and CINAHL to identify studies describing the association between shock metrics on the morbidity and mortality of injured children and adolescents. We used the data presented in the studies to calculate the sensitivity and specificity for each metric. This study was registered with Prospero, protocol CRD42020162971.

RESULTS

Fifteen articles met the inclusion criteria. seven studies evaluated SI or SIPA score, an age-corrected version of SI, as predictors of outcomes following pediatric trauma, with one study comparing SIPA score and SBP and one study comparing SI and SBP. The remaining eight studies evaluated SBP as the primary indicator of shock. The median sensitivity for predicting mortality and need for blood transfusion was highest for SI, followed by SIPA, and then SBP. The median specificity for predicting these outcomes was highest for SBP, followed by SIPA, and then SI.

CONCLUSIONS

Common conclusions were that high SIPA scores were more specific than SI and more sensitive than SBP. SIPA score had better discrimination for severely injured children compared to SI and SBP. An elevated SIPA was associated with a greater need for blood transfusion and higher in-hospital mortality. SIPA is specific enough to exclude most patients who do not require a blood transfusion.

摘要

简介

休克指数(SI)和收缩压(SBP)是用于识别受伤后血流动力学不稳定的儿童和成人的指标。本系统评价的目的是评估这些指标作为儿童损伤后结局预测指标的质量。

材料和方法

我们在 Pubmed、SCOPUS 和 CINAHL 中进行了文献检索,以确定描述休克指标与受伤儿童和青少年发病率和死亡率之间关系的研究。我们使用研究中提供的数据计算了每个指标的敏感性和特异性。本研究在 Prospero 上进行了注册,方案编号为 CRD42020162971。

结果

符合纳入标准的文章有 15 篇。7 项研究评估了 SI 或 SIPA 评分(SI 的年龄校正版本)作为儿童创伤后结局的预测指标,其中 1 项研究比较了 SIPA 评分和 SBP,1 项研究比较了 SI 和 SBP。其余 8 项研究评估了 SBP 作为休克的主要指标。预测死亡率和输血需求的敏感性中位数最高的是 SI,其次是 SIPA,然后是 SBP。预测这些结局的特异性中位数最高的是 SBP,其次是 SIPA,然后是 SI。

结论

共同的结论是,高 SIPA 评分比 SI 更特异,比 SBP 更敏感。与 SI 和 SBP 相比,SIPA 评分对严重受伤的儿童具有更好的鉴别力。升高的 SIPA 与更大的输血需求和更高的院内死亡率相关。SIPA 特异性足以排除大多数不需要输血的患者。