Division of Trauma and Burn Surgery, Children's National Hospital, Washington D.C., United States.
Department of Pediatrics, Children's National Hospital, Washington D.C., United States.
Injury. 2021 Oct;52(10):3166-3172. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2021.06.014. Epub 2021 Jun 24.
Shock-index (SI) and systolic blood pressure (SBP) are metrics for identifying children and adults with hemodynamic instability following injury. The purpose of this systematic review was to assess the quality of these metrics as predictors of outcomes following pediatric injury.
We conducted a literature search in Pubmed, SCOPUS, and CINAHL to identify studies describing the association between shock metrics on the morbidity and mortality of injured children and adolescents. We used the data presented in the studies to calculate the sensitivity and specificity for each metric. This study was registered with Prospero, protocol CRD42020162971.
Fifteen articles met the inclusion criteria. seven studies evaluated SI or SIPA score, an age-corrected version of SI, as predictors of outcomes following pediatric trauma, with one study comparing SIPA score and SBP and one study comparing SI and SBP. The remaining eight studies evaluated SBP as the primary indicator of shock. The median sensitivity for predicting mortality and need for blood transfusion was highest for SI, followed by SIPA, and then SBP. The median specificity for predicting these outcomes was highest for SBP, followed by SIPA, and then SI.
Common conclusions were that high SIPA scores were more specific than SI and more sensitive than SBP. SIPA score had better discrimination for severely injured children compared to SI and SBP. An elevated SIPA was associated with a greater need for blood transfusion and higher in-hospital mortality. SIPA is specific enough to exclude most patients who do not require a blood transfusion.
休克指数(SI)和收缩压(SBP)是用于识别受伤后血流动力学不稳定的儿童和成人的指标。本系统评价的目的是评估这些指标作为儿童损伤后结局预测指标的质量。
我们在 Pubmed、SCOPUS 和 CINAHL 中进行了文献检索,以确定描述休克指标与受伤儿童和青少年发病率和死亡率之间关系的研究。我们使用研究中提供的数据计算了每个指标的敏感性和特异性。本研究在 Prospero 上进行了注册,方案编号为 CRD42020162971。
符合纳入标准的文章有 15 篇。7 项研究评估了 SI 或 SIPA 评分(SI 的年龄校正版本)作为儿童创伤后结局的预测指标,其中 1 项研究比较了 SIPA 评分和 SBP,1 项研究比较了 SI 和 SBP。其余 8 项研究评估了 SBP 作为休克的主要指标。预测死亡率和输血需求的敏感性中位数最高的是 SI,其次是 SIPA,然后是 SBP。预测这些结局的特异性中位数最高的是 SBP,其次是 SIPA,然后是 SI。
共同的结论是,高 SIPA 评分比 SI 更特异,比 SBP 更敏感。与 SI 和 SBP 相比,SIPA 评分对严重受伤的儿童具有更好的鉴别力。升高的 SIPA 与更大的输血需求和更高的院内死亡率相关。SIPA 特异性足以排除大多数不需要输血的患者。