• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

长期护理机构中提供痴呆症护理时抗精神病药物和镇静药物的使用。

Antipsychotic and sedative medication use in long-term care facilities providing dementia care.

机构信息

Senior Lecturer, University of Auckland.

Clinical Nurse Specialist, Waikato District Health Board.

出版信息

N Z Med J. 2021 Jun 25;134(1537):56-65.

PMID:34239162
Abstract

AIM

This study aimed to quantify use of antipsychotic and sedative medications in residents with dementia in long-term care facilities in the Waikato District Health Board (DHB) catchment and to identify factors associated with the prescription of these medications.

METHODS

Resident records and the medication charts of 271 residents with a diagnosis of dementia from 13 dementia units in the Waikato DHB catchment, as well as the psychogeriatric (PG) unit, were reviewed for current prescriptions for any antipsychotic or sedative medication and the date those medications were most recently prescribed.

RESULTS

Antipsychotics were prescribed for 133 (49.1%) residents, with a mean (95% CI) of 401 (354-448) days since the most recent prescription was made. Only 16.8% of antipsychotic prescriptions were prescribed in the preceding 12 weeks, with 31.3% of prescriptions prescribed more than a year prior. Residents were more likely to be prescribed an antipsychotic if they were male (56.9% vs 42.6%, p=.019) or had an incident form completed (30.8% vs 19.6% p=.03). Regression analysis showed only gender (OR 1.79, 95%CI 1.07-2.98, p=.026) was associated with antipsychotic medication prescription. Sedatives were prescribed for 60 (22.1%) residents, with a mean (95%CI) of 487 (431-544) days since the most recent prescription was made, and 44.8% of prescriptions were dated more than a year prior. Residents were more likely to be prescribed a sedative if they entered the facility at a younger age (76.9 vs 79.5, p=.042) or had been in the current facility longer (980 vs 734 days, p=.048). Following regression analysis, no individual factors were significantly associated with sedative prescription.

CONCLUSION

With clear evidence of the risks of antipsychotics to patients with dementia, the proportion of residents prescribed an antipsychotic or sedative in this study, in conjunction with the prolonged duration of prescription, is cause for concern and needs addressing.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在量化怀卡托地区卫生委员会(DHB)范围内长期护理机构中痴呆患者使用抗精神病药和镇静剂的情况,并确定与这些药物处方相关的因素。

方法

对怀卡托 DHB 范围内 13 个痴呆单位(包括精神科老年病房)的 271 名痴呆诊断患者的病历和用药记录进行了回顾性分析,以确定当前是否开具任何抗精神病药或镇静剂,以及最近一次开具这些药物的日期。

结果

共为 133 名(49.1%)患者开具了抗精神病药,最近一次处方后平均(95%CI)为 401(354-448)天。仅 16.8%的抗精神病药处方是在过去 12 周内开具的,31.3%的处方是在一年前开具的。如果患者为男性(56.9%比 42.6%,p=.019)或有新入院记录(30.8%比 19.6%,p=.03),则更有可能被开具抗精神病药。回归分析显示,只有性别(OR 1.79,95%CI 1.07-2.98,p=.026)与抗精神病药处方相关。共为 60 名(22.1%)患者开具了镇静剂,最近一次处方后平均(95%CI)为 487(431-544)天,44.8%的处方是在一年前开具的。如果患者进入护理机构的年龄较小(76.9 岁比 79.5 岁,p=.042)或在当前机构的时间较长(980 天比 734 天,p=.048),则更有可能被开具镇静剂。经过回归分析,没有一个单独的因素与镇静剂处方显著相关。

结论

鉴于抗精神病药对痴呆患者的风险有明确证据,本研究中被开具抗精神病药或镇静剂的患者比例,以及处方的持续时间,都令人担忧,需要加以解决。

相似文献

1
Antipsychotic and sedative medication use in long-term care facilities providing dementia care.长期护理机构中提供痴呆症护理时抗精神病药物和镇静药物的使用。
N Z Med J. 2021 Jun 25;134(1537):56-65.
2
Prolonged use of antipsychotic medications in long-term aged care in Australia: a snapshot from the HALT project.在澳大利亚长期老年护理中使用抗精神病药物的时间延长:HALT 项目的一个快照。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2020 Mar;32(3):335-345. doi: 10.1017/S1041610219002011.
3
Sedative load of medications prescribed for older people with dementia in care homes.养老院中痴呆老年人所开处方药物的镇静剂负荷。
BMC Geriatr. 2011 Sep 30;11:56. doi: 10.1186/1471-2318-11-56.
4
An observational study of antipsychotic medication use among long-stay nursing home residents without qualifying diagnoses.一项针对无合格诊断的长期疗养院居民使用抗精神病药物情况的观察性研究。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2018 Oct;25(8):463-474. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12488. Epub 2018 Aug 2.
5
Psychotropic medication prescribing in assisted living and nursing home residents with dementia after the National Partnership.《全国伙伴关系协议后,痴呆症患者在辅助生活和养老院中的精神药物处方》
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2022 Dec;70(12):3513-3525. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18004. Epub 2022 Aug 19.
6
Antipsychotic drug prescription rates among Dutch nursing homes: the influence of patient characteristics and the dementia special care unit.荷兰养老院中抗精神病药物的处方率:患者特征及痴呆症特殊护理单元的影响
Aging Ment Health. 2014 Sep;18(7):828-32. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2014.884537. Epub 2014 Feb 10.
7
Antipsychotic drug use in nursing home residents with and without dementia: keep an eye on the pro re nata medication.患有和未患痴呆症的养老院居民使用抗精神病药物:留意按需给药。
Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2017 Jul;32(4):213-218. doi: 10.1097/YIC.0000000000000173.
8
Sedative load among long-term care facility residents with and without dementia: a cross-sectional study.长期护理机构中伴有和不伴有痴呆症的居民的镇静剂负荷:一项横断面研究。
Clin Drug Investig. 2010;30(1):63-70. doi: 10.2165/11531460-000000000-00000.
9
Impact of an awareness of the doctors treating on the decrease of the prescriptions of antipsychotics in the demented residents in Ehpad.对埃帕德失智居民中治疗医生的知晓度对抗精神病药物处方减少的影响。
Geriatr Psychol Neuropsychiatr Vieil. 2018 Dec 1;16(4):383-390. doi: 10.1684/pnv.2018.0754.
10
Prevalence of psychotropic medication use among German and Austrian nursing home residents: a comparison of 3 cohorts.德国和奥地利养老院居民精神药物使用的流行率:3 个队列的比较。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2012 Feb;13(2):187.e7-187.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2011.03.007. Epub 2011 May 6.