• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

活性土壤碳对肥料使用效益的影响:来自坦桑尼亚小农户玉米田块的实证证据。

The role of active soil carbon in influencing the profitability of fertilizer use: Empirical evidence from smallholder maize plots in Tanzania.

作者信息

Chamberlin Jordan, Jayne T S, Snapp Sieglinde

机构信息

Socioeconomics Program CIMMYT-Kenya Nairobi Kenya.

Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics Michigan State University East Lansing Michigan USA.

出版信息

Land Degrad Dev. 2021 May 30;32(9):2681-2694. doi: 10.1002/ldr.3940. Epub 2021 Apr 5.

DOI:10.1002/ldr.3940
PMID:34239284
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8251585/
Abstract

We use recent plot-level panel data from Tanzanian smallholder farmers to investigate maize yield responses to inorganic fertilizer under variable soil carbon conditions. Unlike many prior studies which consider total carbon measurements, we focus on active soil carbon, which is a component strongly related to key soil functions, such as nutrient cycling and availability. Active soil carbon is found to be a strong predictor of maize yield response to nitrogen fertilizer. These results highlight important sources of variation in the returns to fertilizer investments across plots and smallholder farmers in the region. When farmgate prices for maize and fertilizer are incorporated into calculations of economic returns, we find that the profitability of fertilizer use is strongly dependent upon farmgate price ratio assumptions: under our most optimistic agronomic response estimates, 39% of farmer plots have an average value-cost ratio greater than 1.5 at a maize-nitrogen price ratio of 0.15. That share drops to 4% at a price ratio of 0.12 and 0% at a price ratio of 0.09. Our findings provide insights into the intertwined biophysical and economic underpinnings of low levels of fertilizer use in Tanzania and elsewhere in the region. Raising active carbon stocks in smallholder systems may be a strategic priority in many areas for incentivizing greater use of inorganic fertilizer, reversing land degradation, and achieving sustainable agricultural intensification.

摘要

我们使用来自坦桑尼亚小农户的最新地块层面面板数据,来研究在不同土壤碳条件下玉米产量对无机肥料的响应。与许多之前考虑总碳测量的研究不同,我们关注的是活性土壤碳,它是与关键土壤功能(如养分循环和有效性)密切相关的一个组成部分。研究发现,活性土壤碳是玉米产量对氮肥响应的一个强有力的预测指标。这些结果凸显了该地区不同地块和小农户肥料投资回报差异的重要来源。当将玉米和肥料的农场门价格纳入经济回报计算时,我们发现肥料使用的盈利能力在很大程度上取决于农场门价格比率假设:在我们最乐观的农艺响应估计下,在玉米 - 氮价格比率为0.15时,39%的农户地块平均价值成本比大于1.5。在价格比率为0.12时,这一比例降至4%,在价格比率为0.09时降至0%。我们的研究结果为坦桑尼亚及该地区其他地方肥料使用水平较低的生物物理和经济交织基础提供了见解。在许多地区,提高小农户系统中的活性碳储量可能是激励更多使用无机肥料、扭转土地退化以及实现可持续农业集约化的战略重点。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c49/8251585/ca87d87429d0/LDR-32-2681-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c49/8251585/0ec6b8b0d899/LDR-32-2681-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c49/8251585/72972ec73161/LDR-32-2681-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c49/8251585/ca87d87429d0/LDR-32-2681-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c49/8251585/0ec6b8b0d899/LDR-32-2681-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c49/8251585/72972ec73161/LDR-32-2681-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c49/8251585/ca87d87429d0/LDR-32-2681-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
The role of active soil carbon in influencing the profitability of fertilizer use: Empirical evidence from smallholder maize plots in Tanzania.活性土壤碳对肥料使用效益的影响:来自坦桑尼亚小农户玉米田块的实证证据。
Land Degrad Dev. 2021 May 30;32(9):2681-2694. doi: 10.1002/ldr.3940. Epub 2021 Apr 5.
2
Assessing and understanding non-responsiveness of maize and soybean to fertilizer applications in African smallholder farms.评估和理解非洲小农户农场中玉米和大豆对肥料施用的无反应情况。
Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2021 Jan 1;305:107165. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2020.107165.
3
Fertilizer profitability for smallholder maize farmers in Tanzania: A spatially-explicit ex ante analysis.坦桑尼亚小农玉米种植户的肥料盈利性:空间明确的事前分析。
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 18;15(9):e0239149. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239149. eCollection 2020.
4
Effective control and yield intensification on maize farms in western Kenya with N fertilizer and herbicide-resistant variety.在肯尼亚西部的玉米农场使用氮肥和抗除草剂品种实现有效控制和产量提高。
Field Crops Res. 2023 May 15;296:108924. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2023.108924.
5
The effect of nitrogen-fertilizer and optimal plant population on the profitability of maize plots in the Wami River sub-basin, Tanzania: A bio-economic simulation approach.氮肥和最佳种植密度对坦桑尼亚瓦米河流域玉米田盈利能力的影响:一种生物经济模拟方法。
Agric Syst. 2020 Nov;185:102948. doi: 10.1016/j.agsy.2020.102948. Epub 2020 Sep 11.
6
Science-based decision support for formulating crop fertilizer recommendations in sub-Saharan Africa.基于科学的决策支持,用于制定撒哈拉以南非洲地区的作物肥料推荐方案。
Agric Syst. 2020 Apr;180:102790. doi: 10.1016/j.agsy.2020.102790.
7
Smallholder Farms and the Potential for Sustainable Intensification.小农户农场与可持续集约化的潜力
Front Plant Sci. 2016 Nov 17;7:1720. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.01720. eCollection 2016.
8
Sustainable maize intensification through site-specific nutrient management advice: Experimental evidence from Nigeria.通过特定地点养分管理建议实现玉米可持续集约化:来自尼日利亚的实验证据。
Food Policy. 2023 Nov;121:102546. doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2023.102546.
9
Profitability of climate-smart soil fertility investment varies widely across sub-Saharan Africa.在撒哈拉以南非洲,气候智能型土壤肥力投资的盈利能力差异很大。
Nat Food. 2022 Apr;3(4):275-285. doi: 10.1038/s43016-022-00493-z. Epub 2022 Apr 25.
10
Enhancing sustainable agri-food systems using multi-nutrient fertilizers in Kenyan smallholder farming systems.在肯尼亚小农户农业系统中使用多养分肥料增强可持续农业食品系统。
Heliyon. 2023 Apr 11;9(4):e15320. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15320. eCollection 2023 Apr.

引用本文的文献

1
Response of tef (Eragrostis tef (Zucc.) Trotter) yield to nutrient management under rainy and irrigation production systems in northwestern Amhara, Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚阿姆哈拉西北部雨季和灌溉生产系统下,画眉草(Eragrostis tef (Zucc.) Trotter)产量对养分管理的响应。
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 31;20(1):e0315730. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0315730. eCollection 2025.
2
Rethreading the needle: A novel molecular index of soil health (MISH) using microbial functional genes to predict soil health management.重新穿针引线:一种利用微生物功能基因预测土壤健康管理的新型土壤健康分子指标(MISH)
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 2;19(12):e0314072. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0314072. eCollection 2024.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Economic incentives to use fertilizer on maize under differing agro-ecological conditions in Burkina Faso.布基纳法索不同农业生态条件下玉米施肥的经济激励措施。
Food Secur. 2018;10:1263-1277. doi: 10.1007/s12571-018-0842-z. Epub 2018 Sep 15.
2
Is increasing inorganic fertilizer use for maize production in SSA a profitable proposition? Evidence from Nigeria.在撒哈拉以南非洲地区增加用于玉米生产的无机肥料使用量是一项有利可图的提议吗?来自尼日利亚的证据。
Food Policy. 2017 Feb;67:41-51. doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2016.09.011.
3
Ten striking facts about agricultural input use in Sub-Saharan Africa.
Integration of organics in nutrient management for rice-wheat system improves nitrogen use efficiency favorable soil biological and electrochemical responses.
在稻麦系统的养分管理中有机物质的整合提高了氮素利用效率,并产生了有利的土壤生物和电化学响应。
Front Plant Sci. 2023 Jan 5;13:1075011. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.1075011. eCollection 2022.
4
The geography of agricultural input markets in rural Tanzania.坦桑尼亚农村地区农业投入市场的地理分布
Food Secur. 2021;13(6):1379-1391. doi: 10.1007/s12571-021-01181-9. Epub 2021 Jun 26.
5
How accurate are yield estimates from crop cuts? Evidence from smallholder maize farms in Ethiopia.作物收割产量估计的准确性如何?来自埃塞俄比亚小农户玉米农场的证据。
Food Policy. 2021 Jul;102:102122. doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2021.102122.
关于撒哈拉以南非洲农业投入使用的十个显著事实。
Food Policy. 2017 Feb;67:12-25. doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2016.09.010.
4
Can sub-Saharan Africa feed itself?撒哈拉以南非洲地区能够实现粮食自给自足吗?
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Dec 27;113(52):14964-14969. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1610359113. Epub 2016 Dec 12.
5
Soil Water Holding Capacity Mitigates Downside Risk and Volatility in US Rainfed Maize: Time to Invest in Soil Organic Matter?土壤持水量减轻了美国雨养玉米的下行风险和波动性:是时候投资土壤有机质了吗?
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 25;11(8):e0160974. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160974. eCollection 2016.
6
Does Land Degradation Increase Poverty in Developing Countries?土地退化会加剧发展中国家的贫困吗?
PLoS One. 2016 May 11;11(5):e0152973. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152973. eCollection 2016.
7
The climate hazards infrared precipitation with stations--a new environmental record for monitoring extremes.气候危害与站点的红外降水——一种新的极端环境监测记录。
Sci Data. 2015 Dec 8;2:150066. doi: 10.1038/sdata.2015.66.
8
Intercropping enhances soil carbon and nitrogen.间作提高了土壤碳氮。
Glob Chang Biol. 2015 Apr;21(4):1715-26. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12738. Epub 2014 Oct 23.
9
Persistence of soil organic matter as an ecosystem property.土壤有机质作为生态系统属性的持久性。
Nature. 2011 Oct 5;478(7367):49-56. doi: 10.1038/nature10386.