Texas Back Institute, Plano, TX, USA.
Texas Back Institute, Plano, TX, USA.
Gait Posture. 2021 Sep;89:67-73. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2021.04.038. Epub 2021 Apr 26.
Changes in balance are common in individuals with spinal disorders and may cause falls. Balance efficiency, is the ability of a person to maintain their center of gravity with minimal neuromuscular energy expenditure, oftentimes referred to as Cone of Economy (CoE). CoE balance is defined by two sets of measures taken from the center of mass (CoM) and head: 1) the range-of-sway (RoS) in the coronal and sagittal planes, and 2) the overall sway distance. This allows spine caregivers to assess the severity of a patient's balance, balance pattern, and dynamic posture and record the changes following surgical intervention. Maintenance of balance requires coordination between the central nervous and musculoskeletal systems.
To discern differences in balance effort values between common degenerative spinal pathologies and a healthy control group.
Three-hundred and forty patients with degenerative spinal pathologies: cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM), adult degenerative scoliosis (ADS), sacroiliac dysfunction (SIJD), degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS), single-level lumbar degeneration (LD), and failed back syndrome (FBS), and 40 healthy controls were recruited. A functional balance test was performed approximately one week before surgery recorded by 3D video motion capture.
Balance effort and compensatory mechanisms were found to be significantly greater in degenerative spinal pathologies patients compared to controls. Head and Center of Mass (CoM) overall sway ranged from 65.22 to 92.78 cm (p < 0.004) and 35.77-53.31 cm (p < 0.001), respectively in degenerative spinal pathologies patients and in comparison to controls (Head: 44.52 cm, CoM: 22.24 cm). Patients with degenerative spinal pathologies presented with greater trunk (1.61-2.98°, p < 0.038), hip (4.25-5.87°, p < 0.049), and knee (4.55-6.09°, p < 0.036) excursion when compared to controls (trunk: 0.95°, hip: 2.97°, and knee: 2.43°).
The results of this study indicate that patients from a wide variety of degenerative spinal pathologies similarly exhibit markedly diminished balance (and compensatory mechanisms) as indicated by increased sway on a Romberg test and a larger Cone of Economy (CoE) as compared to healthy controls. Balance effort, as measured by overall sway, was found to be approximately double in patients with degenerative spinal pathologies compared to healthy matched controls. Clinicians can compare CoE parameters among symptomatic patients from the different cohorts using the Haddas' CoE classification system to guide their postoperative prognosis.
脊柱疾病患者的平衡变化很常见,可能导致跌倒。平衡效率是指一个人以最小的神经肌肉能量消耗来维持其重心的能力,通常被称为经济锥(CoE)。CoE 平衡由从质心(CoM)和头部获得的两组测量值定义:1)冠状面和矢状面的摆动范围(RoS),以及 2)整体摆动距离。这使脊柱护理人员能够评估患者平衡的严重程度、平衡模式和动态姿势,并记录手术干预后的变化。平衡的维持需要中枢神经系统和骨骼肌肉系统之间的协调。
辨别常见退行性脊柱病变与健康对照组之间平衡努力值的差异。
招募了 340 名患有退行性脊柱病变的患者:颈椎病性脊髓病(CSM)、成人退行性脊柱侧凸(ADS)、骶髂关节功能障碍(SIJD)、退行性腰椎滑脱(DLS)、单节段腰椎退变(LD)和失败后综合征(FBS),以及 40 名健康对照者。大约在手术前一周进行了功能性平衡测试,通过 3D 视频运动捕捉进行记录。
与对照组相比,退行性脊柱病变患者的平衡努力和代偿机制明显更大。头部和质心(CoM)的整体摆动范围在退行性脊柱病变患者中分别为 65.22 至 92.78cm(p<0.004)和 35.77-53.31cm(p<0.001),而对照组分别为 44.52cm 和 22.24cm。与对照组相比,退行性脊柱病变患者的躯干(1.61-2.98°,p<0.038)、髋关节(4.25-5.87°,p<0.049)和膝关节(4.55-6.09°,p<0.036)的运动幅度更大。
这项研究的结果表明,来自各种退行性脊柱病变的患者同样表现出明显的平衡能力下降(以及代偿机制),这表现为 Romberg 测试中摆动增加,以及与健康对照组相比,经济锥(CoE)更大。与健康匹配的对照组相比,退行性脊柱病变患者的整体摆动测量的平衡努力大约增加了一倍。临床医生可以使用 Haddas 的 CoE 分类系统比较不同队列中症状患者的 CoE 参数,以指导他们的术后预后。