Suppr超能文献

一种量化“经济锥体”的方法。

A method to quantify the "cone of economy".

作者信息

Haddas Ram, Lieberman Isador H

机构信息

Texas Back Institute Research Foundation, 6020 West Parker Road, Plano, TX, 75093, USA.

Texas Back Institute, Plano, TX, USA.

出版信息

Eur Spine J. 2018 May;27(5):1178-1187. doi: 10.1007/s00586-017-5321-2. Epub 2017 Oct 10.

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

A non-randomized, prospective, concurrent control cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to develop and evaluate a method to quantify the dimensions of the cone of economy (COE) and the energy expenditure associated with maintaining a balanced posture within the COE, scoliosis patients and compare them to matched non-scoliotic controls in a group of adult degenerative. Balance is defined as the ability of the human body to maintain its center of mass (COM) within the base of support with minimal postural sway. The cone of economy refers to the stable region of upright standing posture. The underlying assumption is that deviating outside one's individual cone challenges the balance mechanisms. Adult degenerative scoliosis (ADS) patients exhibit a variety of postural changes within their COE, involving the spine, pelvis and lower extremities, in their effort to compensate for the altered posture.

METHODS

Ten ADS patients and ten non-scoliotic volunteers performed a series of functional balance tests. The dimensions of the COE and the energy expenditure related to maintaining balance within the COE were measured using a human motion video capture system and dynamic surface electromyography.

RESULTS

ADS patients presented more COM sway in the sagittal (ADS: 1.59 cm vs. H: 0.61 cm; p = 0.049) and coronal (ADS: 2.84 cm vs. H: 1.72 cm; p = 0.046) directions in comparison to the non-scoliotic control. ADS patients presented with more COM (ADS: 33.30 cm vs. H: 19.13 cm; p = 0.039) and head (ADS: 31.06 cm vs. H: 19.13 cm; p = 0.013) displacements in comparison to the non-scoliotic controls. Scoliosis patients expended more muscle activity to maintain static standing, as manifest by increased muscle activity in their erector spinae (ADS: 37.16 mV vs. H: 20.31 mV; p = 0.050), and gluteus maximus (ADS: 33.12 mV vs. H: 12.09 mV; p = 0.001) muscles.

CONCLUSIONS

We were able to develop and evaluate a method that quantifies the COE boundaries, COM displacement, and amount of sway within the COE along with the energy expenditure for a specific patient. This method of COE measurement will enable spine care practitioners to objectively evaluate their patients in an effort to determine the most appropriate treatment options, and in objectively documenting the effectiveness of their intervention.

摘要

研究设计

一项非随机、前瞻性、同期对照队列研究。

目的

本研究的目的是开发并评估一种方法,用于量化经济圆锥体(COE)的尺寸以及在COE内维持平衡姿势相关的能量消耗,研究脊柱侧弯患者,并将其与一组成人退行性疾病中匹配的非脊柱侧弯对照进行比较。平衡被定义为人体在支撑面内以最小姿势摆动维持其质心(COM)的能力。经济圆锥体是指直立站立姿势的稳定区域。基本假设是偏离个人的圆锥体挑战平衡机制。成人退行性脊柱侧弯(ADS)患者在其COE内表现出各种姿势变化,涉及脊柱、骨盆和下肢,以努力补偿改变的姿势。

方法

10名ADS患者和10名非脊柱侧弯志愿者进行了一系列功能平衡测试。使用人体运动视频捕捉系统和动态表面肌电图测量COE的尺寸以及与在COE内维持平衡相关的能量消耗。

结果

与非脊柱侧弯对照组相比,ADS患者在矢状面(ADS:1.59厘米对H组:0.61厘米;p = 0.049)和冠状面(ADS:2.84厘米对H组:1.72厘米;p = 0.046)方向上表现出更多的COM摆动。与非脊柱侧弯对照组相比,ADS患者表现出更多的COM(ADS:33.30厘米对H组:19.13厘米;p = 0.039)和头部(ADS:31.06厘米对H组:19.13厘米;p = 0.013)位移。脊柱侧弯患者为维持静态站立消耗了更多的肌肉活动,表现为竖脊肌(ADS:37.16毫伏对H组:20.31毫伏;p = 0.050)和臀大肌(ADS:33.12毫伏对H组:12.09毫伏;p = 0.001)肌肉活动增加。

结论

我们能够开发并评估一种方法,该方法可量化特定患者的COE边界、COM位移、COE内的摆动量以及能量消耗。这种COE测量方法将使脊柱护理从业者能够客观地评估他们的患者,以确定最合适的治疗方案,并客观地记录他们干预措施的有效性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验