Department of Family and Community Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, United States of America.
Didi Hirsch Mental Health Services, Sepulveda Blvd, Culver City, CA, United States of America.
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2021 Dec;131:108547. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2021.108547. Epub 2021 Jun 24.
Individuals with serious mental illness have high rates of substance use. The most commonly used substances among this population are alcohol and cannabis, and whether clinical providers delivering mental health services feel adequately prepared to address substance use is unclear. While information about the effects of alcohol are well established, the effects of cannabis are less well known and staff may feel less confident in their abilities to assess its use and may rely on more informal sources to learn about it.
Mental health agencies in three states (California, Ohio, and New York) surveyed their staff (n =717) to explore their knowledge, training, and expertise in assessment of substance use generally as well as cannabis and alcohol specifically.
Overall, providers felt more prepared to address their clients' alcohol use than cannabis use. In between-state comparisons, California providers felt significantly less well prepared to assess, discuss, and refer their clients to treatment compared to Ohio and New York providers. Using a series of multi-categorical mediation models, we confirmed that deficits in training for these specific substances largely accounted for between-state differences in assessment, capacity, and treatment.
Substance use training to address the service needs of individuals with co-occurring disorders is insufficient and a significant need exists for systemic changes to workforce training of community mental health providers.
患有严重精神疾病的个体滥用物质的比例较高。该人群中最常使用的物质是酒精和大麻,而提供精神卫生服务的临床医生是否觉得自己有能力解决物质使用问题尚不清楚。虽然关于酒精影响的信息已经很明确,但大麻的影响却鲜为人知,工作人员可能对自己评估其使用情况的能力缺乏信心,可能依赖更非正式的来源来了解它。
三个州(加利福尼亚州、俄亥俄州和纽约州)的心理健康机构对其工作人员(n=717)进行了调查,以探讨他们在一般物质使用评估以及具体的大麻和酒精使用评估方面的知识、培训和专业知识。
总体而言,与大麻使用相比,提供者更有准备解决客户的酒精使用问题。在州际比较中,与俄亥俄州和纽约州的提供者相比,加利福尼亚州的提供者在评估、讨论和转介客户接受治疗方面的准备明显不足。通过一系列多类别中介模型,我们证实,针对这些特定物质的培训不足在很大程度上解释了评估、能力和治疗方面的州际差异。
解决共病患者服务需求的物质使用培训不足,需要对社区精神卫生提供者的劳动力培训进行系统改革。