• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

介入治疗慢性、轴向或神经根性、非癌症性脊柱疼痛:一项随机试验系统评价和网络荟萃分析的方案。

Interventional treatments for chronic, axial or radicular, non-cancer, spinal pain: a protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised trials.

机构信息

Michael G. DeGroote Institute for Pain Research and Care, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2021 Jul 9;11(7):e046025. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046025.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046025
PMID:34244262
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8273478/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Chronic, non-cancer, axial or radicular spinal pain is a common condition associated with considerable socioeconomic burden. Clinicians frequently offer patients various interventional procedures for the treatment of chronic spine pain; however, the comparative effectiveness and safety of available procedures remains uncertain.

METHODS

We will conduct a systematic review of randomised controlled trials that explores the effectiveness and harms of interventional procedures for the management of axial or radicular, chronic, non-cancer, spine pain. We will identify eligible studies through a systematic search of Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Web of Science from inception without language restrictions. Eligible trials will: (1) enrol primarily adult patients (≥18 years old) with axial or radicular, chronic, non-cancer, spine pain, (2) randomise patients to different, currently available, interventional procedures or to an interventional procedure and a placebo/sham procedure or usual care, and (3) measure outcomes at least 1 month after randomisation.Pairs of reviewers will independently screen articles identified through searches and extract information and assess risk of bias of eligible trials. We will use a modified Cochrane instrument to evaluate risk of bias. We will use frequentist random-effects network meta-analyses to assess the relative effects of interventional procedures, and five a priori hypotheses to explore between studies subgroup effects. We will use the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach to assess the certainty in evidence for each outcome, including direct, indirect and network estimates.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

No research ethics approval is required for this systematic review, as no confidential patient data will be used. We will disseminate our findings through publication in a peer-reviewed journal and conference presentations, and our review will support development of a Rapid Recommendations providing contextualised clinical guidance based on this body of evidence.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42020170667.

摘要

介绍

慢性、非癌症、轴向或神经根性脊柱疼痛是一种常见的病症,与相当大的社会经济负担有关。临床医生经常为慢性脊柱疼痛患者提供各种介入性手术治疗;然而,现有手术的疗效和安全性仍不确定。

方法

我们将对随机对照试验进行系统评价,探讨介入性手术治疗轴向或神经根性、慢性、非癌症、脊柱疼痛的有效性和危害。我们将通过系统检索 Medline、EMBASE、CINAHL、Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库和 Web of Science,从成立之初开始,在不限制语言的情况下确定合格的研究。合格的试验将:(1)纳入主要为患有轴向或神经根性、慢性、非癌症、脊柱疼痛的成年患者(≥18 岁);(2)将患者随机分配到不同的、目前可用的介入性手术或介入性手术与安慰剂/假手术或常规护理;(3)至少在随机分组后 1 个月测量结局。 pairs of reviewers 将独立筛选通过搜索确定的文章,并提取信息和评估合格试验的偏倚风险。我们将使用修改后的 Cochrane 工具评估偏倚风险。我们将使用频率随机效应网络荟萃分析来评估介入性手术的相对效果,并使用五个事先假设来探索研究之间的亚组效应。我们将使用推荐评估、制定和评估方法来评估每个结局的证据确定性,包括直接、间接和网络估计。

伦理与传播

由于本系统评价不使用任何机密患者数据,因此不需要研究伦理批准。我们将通过在同行评议期刊上发表和会议演示来传播我们的发现,我们的审查将支持快速推荐的制定,该推荐将基于这一证据体提供基于背景的临床指导。

PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42020170667。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c7b/8273478/7d3bfe037bc1/bmjopen-2020-046025f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c7b/8273478/bb8c112db8e2/bmjopen-2020-046025f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c7b/8273478/7d3bfe037bc1/bmjopen-2020-046025f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c7b/8273478/bb8c112db8e2/bmjopen-2020-046025f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c7b/8273478/7d3bfe037bc1/bmjopen-2020-046025f02.jpg

相似文献

1
Interventional treatments for chronic, axial or radicular, non-cancer, spinal pain: a protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised trials.介入治疗慢性、轴向或神经根性、非癌症性脊柱疼痛:一项随机试验系统评价和网络荟萃分析的方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jul 9;11(7):e046025. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046025.
2
Management of acute musculoskeletal pain (excluding low back pain): protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised trials.急性肌肉骨骼疼痛管理(不包括腰痛):系统评价和网络荟萃分析随机试验的方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Apr 3;9(4):e024441. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024441.
3
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
4
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状Meta分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 9;1(1):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub3.
5
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.
6
Sympathetic nerve blocks for persistent pain in adults with inoperable abdominopelvic cancer.成人无法手术的腹盆腔癌症持续性疼痛的交感神经阻滞。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 6;6(6):CD015229. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015229.pub2.
7
Individual opioids, and long- versus short-acting opioids, for chronic noncancer pain: Protocol for a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.用于慢性非癌性疼痛的个体阿片类药物以及长效与短效阿片类药物:随机对照试验网络荟萃分析方案
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Oct;98(43):e17647. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000017647.
8
Pharmacotherapy in paediatric type 2 diabetes mellitus: a protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised trials.儿科 2 型糖尿病的药物治疗:一项随机试验系统评价和网络荟萃分析的方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Sep 26;12(9):e065287. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065287.
9
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.成人全身麻醉后预防术后恶心呕吐的药物:网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2.
10
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块型银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 23;5(5):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub5.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative effectiveness of manual therapy, pharmacological treatment, exercise therapy, and education for neck pain (COMPETE study): protocol of a systematic review with network meta-analysis.手法治疗、药物治疗、运动疗法及颈部疼痛教育的比较效果(COMPETE研究):一项网络荟萃分析的系统评价方案
Syst Rev. 2025 Jan 31;14(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02737-4.

本文引用的文献

1
Epidural Interventions in the Management of Chronic Spinal Pain: American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians (ASIPP) Comprehensive Evidence-Based Guidelines.硬膜外介入治疗慢性脊柱疼痛管理:美国介入疼痛医师学会(ASIPP)综合循证指南。
Pain Physician. 2021 Jan;24(S1):S27-S208.
2
Minimal important difference estimates for patient-reported outcomes: A systematic survey.最小有意义差异估计值在患者报告结局中的应用:一项系统调查。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 May;133:61-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.11.024. Epub 2020 Dec 13.
3
GRADE approach to drawing conclusions from a network meta-analysis using a minimally contextualised framework.
使用最小化情境化框架从网络荟萃分析得出结论的GRADE方法。
BMJ. 2020 Nov 11;371:m3900. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m3900.
4
Management of Acute Pain From Non-Low Back, Musculoskeletal Injuries : A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials.非低背、肌肉骨骼损伤急性疼痛的管理:随机试验的系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Ann Intern Med. 2020 Nov 3;173(9):730-738. doi: 10.7326/M19-3601. Epub 2020 Aug 18.
5
The revised Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2) showed low interrater reliability and challenges in its application.修订后的 Cochrane 随机对照试验偏倚风险工具(RoB 2)显示出较低的评分者间可靠性和应用方面的挑战。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Oct;126:37-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.06.015. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
6
Comprehensive Evidence-Based Guidelines for Facet Joint Interventions in the Management of Chronic Spinal Pain: American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians (ASIPP) Guidelines Facet Joint Interventions 2020 Guidelines.综合循证指南:脊柱关节突关节介入治疗慢性脊柱疼痛管理:美国介入疼痛医师学会(ASIPP)指南 2020 年脊柱关节突关节介入治疗指南。
Pain Physician. 2020 May;23(3S):S1-S127.
7
Evaluating the credibility of anchor based estimates of minimal important differences for patient reported outcomes: instrument development and reliability study.评估基于锚点的患者报告结局最小重要差异估计值的可信度:仪器开发和可靠性研究。
BMJ. 2020 Jun 4;369:m1714. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m1714.
8
Interventional pain management for chronic pain: a survey of physicians in Canada.介入性疼痛管理治疗慢性疼痛:对加拿大医生的调查。
Can J Anaesth. 2020 Mar;67(3):343-352. doi: 10.1007/s12630-019-01547-w. Epub 2019 Dec 4.
9
Radiofrequency neurotomy in chronic lumbar and sacroiliac joint pain: A meta-analysis.慢性腰和骶髂关节疼痛的射频神经切断术:一项荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Jun;98(26):e16230. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000016230.
10
Nonsurgical medical treatment in the management of pain due to lumbar disc prolapse: A network meta-analysis.非手术医学治疗腰椎间盘突出症疼痛管理:网络荟萃分析。
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2019 Oct;49(2):303-313. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2019.02.012. Epub 2019 Mar 4.