Associate Professor and Head of 3D-Laboratory, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery & University of Southern Denmark, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Regional Health Research, Esbjerg Denmark.
Technical Engineer, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 3D-Laboratory, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Esbjerg, Denmark.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021 Nov;79(11):2320-2333. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2021.06.003. Epub 2021 Jun 10.
Three-dimensional (3D) assessment of orthognathic surgery is often time consuming, relies on manual re-identification of anatomical landmarks or is limited to non-segmental osteotomies. The purpose of the present study was to propose and validate an automated approach for 3D assessment of the accuracy and postoperative outcome of segmental bimaxillary surgery.
A semi-automatic approach was developed and validated for virtual surgical analysis (VSA) of segmental bimaxillary surgery using a pair of pre- and postoperative (2 weeks) cone-beam computerized tomography (CBCT) scans. The output of the VSA, the accuracy of the surgical outcome, was calculated as 3D translational and rotational differences between the planned and postoperative movements of the individual bone segments. To evaluate the reliability of the proposed VSA, intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated at a 95% confidence interval on measurements of 2 observers. The VSA was deemed reliable if the ICC was excellent (> 0.80) and the absolute difference of the repeated intra- and inter-observer translational and rotational measurements were significantly lower (p < 0.05) than a hypothesized clinical relevant threshold of 1 voxel (0.45 mm) and 1 degree, respectively.
A total of 10 subjects (6 male; 4 women; mean age 24.4 years) with skeletal class 2 and 3, who underwent segmental bimaxillary surgery, 3-piece Le Fort I, bilateral sagittal split osteotomy and genioplasty, were recruited. The intra- and inter-observer reliability was excellent, ICC range [0.96 - 1.00]. The range of the mean absolute difference of the repeated intra- and inter-observer translational and rotational measurements were [0.07 mm (0.05) - 0.20 mm (0.19)] and [0.11˚ (0.08) - 0.63˚ (0.42)], respectively. This was significantly lower than the hypothesized clinical relevant thresholds (P < .001).
The validation showed that the VSA has excellent reliability for quantitative assessment of the postoperative outcome and accuracy of segmental bimaxillary surgery.
三维(3D)评估正颌手术通常耗时较长,依赖于解剖标志的手动重新识别,或者仅限于非节段性骨切开术。本研究旨在提出并验证一种用于评估节段性双颌手术准确性和术后结果的自动方法。
开发了一种半自动方法,用于使用一对术前和术后(2 周)锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)扫描进行节段性双颌手术的虚拟手术分析(VSA)。VSA 的输出,即手术结果的准确性,计算为个体骨段的计划和术后运动之间的 3D 平移和旋转差异。为了评估所提出的 VSA 的可靠性,在 95%置信区间内计算了 2 名观察者测量的组内相关系数(ICC)。如果 ICC 为优秀(>0.80),并且重复的内-间和间-内观察者平移和旋转测量的绝对差异明显低于(p<0.05)假设的临床相关阈值 1 体素(0.45 毫米)和 1 度,则认为 VSA 是可靠的。
共招募了 10 名患者(6 名男性;4 名女性;平均年龄 24.4 岁),患有骨骼 2 类和 3 类,行节段性双颌手术、3 段 Le Fort I、双侧矢状劈开截骨术和颏成形术。内-间和间-间观察者的可靠性均为优秀,ICC 范围为 [0.96-1.00]。重复的内-间和间-间观察者平移和旋转测量的平均绝对差异范围分别为 [0.07 毫米(0.05)-0.20 毫米(0.19)]和 [0.11˚(0.08)-0.63˚(0.42)]。这明显低于假设的临床相关阈值(P<.001)。
验证表明,VSA 具有出色的可靠性,可用于定量评估节段性双颌手术的术后结果和准确性。