Inácio Silveira Daniela Quaresma, Lia Erica Negrini, Massignan Carla, Stefani Cristine Miron
Dental Surgeon, Universitary Hospital of Brasília (HUB), University of Brasília(UnB), Brasília, DF, Brazil.
Associate Professor, Department of Dentistry, School of Health Sciences, University of Brasília (UnB), Brasília, DF, Brazil.
J Prosthet Dent. 2023 Mar;129(3):413-424. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.05.022. Epub 2021 Jul 8.
Evidence for the efficacy and safety of natural products for the treatment of denture stomatitis is lacking.
The purpose of this systematic review was to answer the question "Are topical natural substances effective and safe compared with conventional antifungals in the treatment of denture stomatitis?"
A structured search in 11 databases, including non-peer-reviewed, was undertaken. Two authors independently selected the studies, extracted the data, assessed the study quality, and graded the evidence, with disagreement resolved with a third reviewer. Data were evaluated descriptively by following Synthesis Without Meta-analysis (SWiM) reporting items. This study was registered at the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO), number CRD42020216213.
After the removal of duplicates, 1925 records remained, and after a 2-phase reading of abstracts and full texts, 17 studies were included. Propolis, green tea, ginger, Zataria multiflora, chitosan, garlic, Artemisia, Schinus terebinthifolius Raddi, Uncaria tomentosa, Punica granatum, and Ricinus communis appeared to have similar efficacy and safety when compared with nystatin or miconazole. Most of the studies presented a high risk of bias.
Certainty in the body of evidence that natural products might be appropriately used in the treatment of denture stomatitis is low. Well-designed randomized controlled trials are still needed to evaluate the topic better because there is high heterogeneity among the studies.
缺乏天然产物治疗义齿性口炎有效性和安全性的证据。
本系统评价的目的是回答“与传统抗真菌药物相比,局部应用天然物质治疗义齿性口炎是否有效且安全?”这一问题。
在11个数据库(包括非同行评审数据库)中进行结构化检索。两位作者独立选择研究、提取数据、评估研究质量并对证据进行分级,如有分歧则由第三位评审员解决。按照非荟萃分析的系统评价(SWiM)报告项目对数据进行描述性评估。本研究已在国际系统评价前瞻性注册库(PROSPERO)注册,注册号为CRD42020216213。
去除重复记录后,剩余1925条记录,经过对摘要和全文的两阶段阅读,纳入了17项研究。与制霉菌素或咪康唑相比,蜂胶、绿茶、生姜、百里香、壳聚糖大蒜、青蒿、巴西胡椒、猫爪草、石榴和蓖麻似乎具有相似的疗效和安全性。大多数研究存在较高的偏倚风险。
关于天然产物可适用于治疗义齿性口炎的证据确定性较低。由于研究之间存在高度异质性,仍需要设计良好的随机对照试验来更好地评估这一主题。