Suppr超能文献

基于社区的参与式研究伙伴关系自我评估的结果:罗彻斯特健康社区伙伴关系的经验。

Outcomes of a Community-Based Participatory Research Partnership Self-Evaluation: The Rochester Healthy Community Partnership Experience.

出版信息

Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2021;15(2):161-175. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2021.0019.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Community-based participatory research (CBPR) can effectively address health disparities among groups that are historically difficult to reach, disadvantaged, of a minority status, or are otherwise underrepresented in research. Recent research has focused on the science of CBPR partnership constructs and on developing and testing tools for self-evaluation. Because CBPR requires substantial investment in human and material resources, specific factors that support successful and sustainable research partnerships must be identified. We sought to describe the evolution, implementation, and results of a self-evaluation of a CBPR partnership.

METHODS

Academic and community members of the Rochester Healthy Community Partnership (RHCP) and researchers from the University of New Mexico-Center for Participatory Research collaborated to evaluate RHCP with qualitative and quantitative research methods and group analysis.

RESULTS

The self-evaluation was used to provide an overall picture of the "health" of the partnership, in terms of sustainability and ability to effectively collaborate around community priorities. RHCP members revisited the partnership's mission and values; identified associations between partnership practices, dynamics, and outcomes; and elicited insight from community and academic partners to help guide decisions about future directions and the sustainability of the partnership. Positive partnership dynamics were associated with perceived improvements in health and equity outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Although engaging in a comprehensive self-evaluation requires substantial investment from stakeholders, such assessments have significant value because they enable partners to reflect on the mission and values of the partnership, explore the history and context for its existence, identify factors that have contributed to outcomes, and plan strategically for the future.

摘要

背景

社区参与式研究(CBPR)可以有效地解决历史上难以接触、处于不利地位、少数群体地位或在研究中代表性不足的群体之间的健康差距。最近的研究集中在 CBPR 伙伴关系结构的科学以及开发和测试自我评估工具上。由于 CBPR 需要在人力和物力资源上进行大量投资,因此必须确定支持成功和可持续研究伙伴关系的具体因素。我们试图描述罗切斯特健康社区伙伴关系(RHCP)的自我评估的演变、实施和结果。

方法

罗切斯特健康社区伙伴关系(RHCP)的学术和社区成员以及新墨西哥大学-参与式研究中心的研究人员合作,使用定性和定量研究方法以及小组分析来评估 RHCP。

结果

自我评估用于从可持续性和围绕社区优先事项有效合作的能力方面,全面描述伙伴关系的“健康”状况。RHCP 成员重新审视了伙伴关系的使命和价值观;确定了伙伴关系实践、动态和结果之间的关联;并从社区和学术伙伴那里获得了见解,以帮助指导未来方向和伙伴关系可持续性的决策。积极的伙伴关系动态与感知到的健康和公平结果的改善相关。

结论

尽管进行全面的自我评估需要利益相关者大量投资,但此类评估具有重要价值,因为它们使合作伙伴能够反思伙伴关系的使命和价值观,探讨其存在的历史和背景,确定促成结果的因素,并为未来进行战略规划。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验