Suppr超能文献

重新审视基于胜任力的医学教育的价值主张。

Re-examining the value proposition for Competency-Based Medical Education.

作者信息

Dagnone Jeffrey Damon, Bandiera Glenn, Harris Kenneth

机构信息

Emergency Medicine, Queens University, Ontario, Canada.

Emergency Medicine and Post-Graduate Medical Education, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Can Med Educ J. 2021 Jun 30;12(3):155-158. doi: 10.36834/cmej.68245. eCollection 2021 Jun.

Abstract

The adoption of competency-based medical education (CBME) by Canadian postgraduate training programs has created a storm of excitement and controversy. Implementing the system-wide Competency by Design (CBD) project initiated by the Royal College of Physicians & Surgeons of Canada (RCPSC), is an ambitious transformative change challenge. Not surprisingly, tensions have arisen across the country around the theoretical underpinnings of CBME and the practicalities of implementation, resulting in calls for evidence justifying its value. Assumptions have been made on both sides of the argument contributing to an atmosphere of unhealthy protection of the status quo, premature conclusions of CBME's worth, and an oversimplification of risks and costs to participants. We feel that a renewed effort to find a shared vision of medical education and the true value proposition of CBME is required to recreate a growth-oriented mindset. Also, the aspirational assertion of a direct link between CBME and improved patient outcomes requires deferral until further implementation and study has occurred. However, we perceive more concrete and immediate value of CBME arises from the societal contract physicians have, the connection to maintaining self-regulation, and the potential customization of training for learners.

摘要

加拿大研究生培训项目采用基于能力的医学教育(CBME)引发了一阵兴奋与争议的浪潮。实施由加拿大皇家内科医师与外科医师学院(RCPSC)发起的全系统“设计中的能力”(CBD)项目,是一项雄心勃勃的变革性挑战。不出所料,全国各地围绕CBME的理论基础和实施的实际情况出现了紧张局面,导致人们呼吁提供证据证明其价值。争论双方都做出了假设,这营造了一种对现状过度保护、对CBME价值过早下结论以及对参与者的风险和成本过度简化的不健康氛围。我们认为,需要重新努力找到医学教育的共同愿景以及CBME的真正价值主张,以重塑一种注重成长的思维模式。此外,关于CBME与改善患者结局之间存在直接联系的理想断言,需要推迟到进一步实施和研究之后。然而,我们认为CBME更具体、更直接的价值源于医生所承担的社会契约、与维持自我监管的联系以及为学习者量身定制培训的潜力。

相似文献

1
Re-examining the value proposition for Competency-Based Medical Education.重新审视基于胜任力的医学教育的价值主张。
Can Med Educ J. 2021 Jun 30;12(3):155-158. doi: 10.36834/cmej.68245. eCollection 2021 Jun.
2
A systems approach for institutional CBME adoption at Queen's University.以系统方法在皇后大学推行机构 CBME。
Med Teach. 2020 Aug;42(8):916-921. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2020.1767768. Epub 2020 Jun 2.

引用本文的文献

7
Writing, reading, and critiquing reviews.撰写、阅读和评论综述。
Can Med Educ J. 2021 Jun 30;12(3):1-7. doi: 10.36834/cmej.72945. eCollection 2021 Jun.

本文引用的文献

8
Evaluating the impact of simulation on translational patient outcomes.评估模拟对转化患者结局的影响。
Simul Healthc. 2011 Aug;6 Suppl(Suppl):S42-7. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0b013e318222fde9.
10
Failure to fail: the perspectives of clinical supervisors.无法失败:临床督导的观点。
Acad Med. 2005 Oct;80(10 Suppl):S84-7. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200510001-00023.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验