Ott Mary C, Dengler Lori, Hibbert Kathryn, Ott Michael
Faculty of Education, York University, Toronto, Canada.
Centre for Education Research & Innovation, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Canada.
Med Educ. 2025 Apr;59(4):428-438. doi: 10.1111/medu.15475. Epub 2024 Aug 6.
Competency-based medical education (CBME) promises to improve medical education through curricular reforms to support learner development. This intention may be at risk in the case of a Canadian approach to CBME called Competence by Design (CBD), since there have been negative impacts on residents. According to Joseph Schwab, teachers, learners and milieu must be included in the process of curriculum-making to prevent misalignments between intended values and practice. This study considered what can be learned from the process of designing, enacting and adapting CBD to better support learners.
This qualitative study explored the making of CBD through the perspectives of implementation leads (N = 18) at national, institutional and programme levels. A sociomaterial orientation to agency in curriculum-making guided the inductive approach to interviewing and analysis in phase one. A deductive analysis in phase two applied Schwab's theory to further understand sources of misalignments and the purpose of adaptive responses.
Misalignments occurred when the needs of teachers, learners and milieu were initially underestimated in the process of curriculum-making, disconnecting assessment practices from experiences of teaching, learning and entrustment. While technical and structural issues posed significant constraints on agency, some implementation leads were able to make changes to the curriculum or context to fix the disconnects. We identified six purposes for principled adaptations to align with CBME values of responsive teaching, individualised learning and meaningful entrustment.
Collectively, the adaptations we characterise demonstrate constructive alignment, a foundational principle of CBME in which assessment and teaching work together to support learning. This study proposes a model for making context-shaped, values-based adaptations to CBME to achieve its promise.
基于胜任力的医学教育(CBME)有望通过课程改革来改善医学教育,以支持学习者的发展。对于加拿大一种名为“设计即胜任力”(CBD)的CBME方法而言,这一目标可能面临风险,因为它对住院医师产生了负面影响。根据约瑟夫·施瓦布的观点,课程编制过程中必须纳入教师、学习者和环境因素,以防止预期价值与实践之间出现偏差。本研究探讨了从CBD的设计、实施和调整过程中可以学到什么,以便更好地支持学习者。
这项定性研究从国家、机构和项目层面的实施负责人(N = 18)的角度,探讨了CBD的形成过程。课程编制中对能动性的社会物质取向指导了第一阶段访谈和分析的归纳方法。第二阶段的演绎分析应用了施瓦布的理论,以进一步理解偏差的来源和适应性应对的目的。
在课程编制过程中,教师、学习者和环境的需求最初被低估时,就会出现偏差,使评估实践与教学、学习和委托体验脱节。虽然技术和结构问题对能动性构成了重大限制,但一些实施负责人能够对课程或环境进行调整,以修复脱节问题。我们确定了六项有原则的调整目的,以符合响应式教学、个性化学习和有意义委托的CBME价值观。
总体而言,我们所描述的这些调整体现了建设性对齐,这是CBME的一项基本原则,即评估和教学共同作用以支持学习。本研究提出了一个针对CBME进行情境塑造、基于价值观的调整的模型,以实现其承诺。