• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Fixing disconnects: Exploring the emergence of principled adaptations in a competency-based curriculum.解决脱节问题:探索基于能力的课程中原则性适应措施的出现。
Med Educ. 2025 Apr;59(4):428-438. doi: 10.1111/medu.15475. Epub 2024 Aug 6.
2
Lost in translation? How context shapes the implementation of Competence by Design in operative settings.迷失在翻译中?情境如何塑造手术环境中“设计胜任力”的实施。
Can J Surg. 2025 Feb 6;68(1):E49-E54. doi: 10.1503/cjs.014623. Print 2025 Jan-Feb.
3
Aligning Requirements of Training and Assessment in Radiation Treatment Planning in the Era of Competency-Based Medical Education.在以能力为基础的医学教育时代调整放射治疗计划培训和评估的要求。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2020 Jan 1;106(1):32-36. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.10.005. Epub 2019 Oct 21.
4
"The Most Crushing Thing": Understanding Resident Assessment Burden in a Competency-Based Curriculum."最沉重的负担":理解基于能力的课程中的居民评估负担。
J Grad Med Educ. 2022 Oct;14(5):583-592. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-22-00050.1.
5
Is Competency-Based Medical Education being implemented as intended? Early lessons learned from Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.基于能力的医学教育是否按预期实施?物理医学与康复的早期经验教训。
Can Med Educ J. 2024 Aug 30;15(4):50-55. doi: 10.36834/cmej.77188. eCollection 2024 Aug.
6
Tensions in describing competency-based medical education: a study of Canadian key opinion leaders.描述以能力为基础的医学教育的紧张局势:对加拿大主要意见领袖的研究。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2021 Oct;26(4):1277-1289. doi: 10.1007/s10459-021-10049-8. Epub 2021 Apr 24.
7
Competency-based teacher training: A systematic revision of a proven programme in medical didactics.基于能力的教师培训:医学教学法中一个经过验证的项目的系统修订。
GMS J Med Educ. 2017 Oct 16;34(4):Doc44. doi: 10.3205/zma001121. eCollection 2017.
8
Advancing anti-oppression and social justice in healthcare through competency-based medical education (CBME).通过基于能力的医学教育(CBME)推进医疗保健中的反压迫和社会正义。
Med Teach. 2024 Sep;46(9):1167-1174. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2023.2298763. Epub 2024 Jan 12.
9
Was it all worth it? A graduating resident perspective on CBME.这一切都值得吗?一位即将毕业的住院医师对基于能力的医学教育的看法。
Med Teach. 2025 Mar;47(3):467-475. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2024.2339408. Epub 2024 May 14.
10
Aiming Beyond Competent: The Application of the Taxonomy of Significant Learning to Medical Education.超越胜任:重要学习分类法在医学教育中的应用。
Teach Learn Med. 2019 Aug-Sep;31(4):466-478. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2018.1561368. Epub 2019 Jan 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Lost in translation? How context shapes the implementation of Competence by Design in operative settings.迷失在翻译中?情境如何塑造手术环境中“设计胜任力”的实施。
Can J Surg. 2025 Feb 6;68(1):E49-E54. doi: 10.1503/cjs.014623. Print 2025 Jan-Feb.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluating Competence by Design as a Large System Change Initiative: Readiness, Fidelity, and Outcomes.通过设计评估能力作为一个大型系统变革计划:准备情况、保真度和结果。
Perspect Med Educ. 2024 Feb 6;13(1):95-107. doi: 10.5334/pme.962. eCollection 2024.
2
Coaching in Competence by Design: A New Model of Coaching in the Moment and Coaching Over Time to Support Large Scale Implementation.设计导向的能力辅导:一种新的即时辅导和持续辅导模式,以支持大规模实施。
Perspect Med Educ. 2024 Feb 6;13(1):33-43. doi: 10.5334/pme.959. eCollection 2024.
3
Unintended consequences of technology in competency-based education: a qualitative study of lessons learned in an OtoHNS program.基于能力的教育中技术的意外后果:一项耳鼻喉项目经验教训的定性研究。
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023 Aug 23;52(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s40463-023-00649-2.
4
The Assessment Burden in Competency-Based Medical Education: How Programs Are Adapting.基于能力的医学教育中的评估负担:各项目如何适应。
Acad Med. 2023 Nov 1;98(11):1261-1267. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000005305. Epub 2023 Jun 21.
5
Educating for adaptive expertise: case examples along the medical education continuum.培养适应性专长:医学教育连续统一体中的案例示例
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2022 Dec;27(5):1383-1400. doi: 10.1007/s10459-022-10165-z. Epub 2022 Nov 21.
6
Implementation of Entrustable Professional Activities assessments in a Canadian obstetrics and gynecology residency program: a mixed methods study.加拿大妇产科住院医师培训项目中可委托专业活动评估的实施:一项混合方法研究。
Can Med Educ J. 2022 Sep 1;13(5):77-81. doi: 10.36834/cmej.72567. eCollection 2022 Sep.
7
"The Most Crushing Thing": Understanding Resident Assessment Burden in a Competency-Based Curriculum."最沉重的负担":理解基于能力的课程中的居民评估负担。
J Grad Med Educ. 2022 Oct;14(5):583-592. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-22-00050.1.
8
The logic behind entrustable professional activity frameworks: A scoping review of the literature.委托式专业活动框架背后的逻辑:文献综述
Med Educ. 2022 Sep;56(9):881-891. doi: 10.1111/medu.14806. Epub 2022 Apr 19.
9
Twelve tips for introducing E-Portfolios in health professions education.在健康职业教育中引入电子档案袋的 12 个技巧。
Med Teach. 2023 Feb;45(2):139-144. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2022.2053085. Epub 2022 Mar 31.
10
Growth mindset in competency-based medical education.基于能力的医学教育中的成长型思维模式。
Med Teach. 2021 Jul;43(7):751-757. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2021.1928036. Epub 2021 Jul 10.

解决脱节问题:探索基于能力的课程中原则性适应措施的出现。

Fixing disconnects: Exploring the emergence of principled adaptations in a competency-based curriculum.

作者信息

Ott Mary C, Dengler Lori, Hibbert Kathryn, Ott Michael

机构信息

Faculty of Education, York University, Toronto, Canada.

Centre for Education Research & Innovation, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Canada.

出版信息

Med Educ. 2025 Apr;59(4):428-438. doi: 10.1111/medu.15475. Epub 2024 Aug 6.

DOI:10.1111/medu.15475
PMID:39105665
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11906271/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Competency-based medical education (CBME) promises to improve medical education through curricular reforms to support learner development. This intention may be at risk in the case of a Canadian approach to CBME called Competence by Design (CBD), since there have been negative impacts on residents. According to Joseph Schwab, teachers, learners and milieu must be included in the process of curriculum-making to prevent misalignments between intended values and practice. This study considered what can be learned from the process of designing, enacting and adapting CBD to better support learners.

METHODS

This qualitative study explored the making of CBD through the perspectives of implementation leads (N = 18) at national, institutional and programme levels. A sociomaterial orientation to agency in curriculum-making guided the inductive approach to interviewing and analysis in phase one. A deductive analysis in phase two applied Schwab's theory to further understand sources of misalignments and the purpose of adaptive responses.

RESULTS

Misalignments occurred when the needs of teachers, learners and milieu were initially underestimated in the process of curriculum-making, disconnecting assessment practices from experiences of teaching, learning and entrustment. While technical and structural issues posed significant constraints on agency, some implementation leads were able to make changes to the curriculum or context to fix the disconnects. We identified six purposes for principled adaptations to align with CBME values of responsive teaching, individualised learning and meaningful entrustment.

CONCLUSION

Collectively, the adaptations we characterise demonstrate constructive alignment, a foundational principle of CBME in which assessment and teaching work together to support learning. This study proposes a model for making context-shaped, values-based adaptations to CBME to achieve its promise.

摘要

目的

基于胜任力的医学教育(CBME)有望通过课程改革来改善医学教育,以支持学习者的发展。对于加拿大一种名为“设计即胜任力”(CBD)的CBME方法而言,这一目标可能面临风险,因为它对住院医师产生了负面影响。根据约瑟夫·施瓦布的观点,课程编制过程中必须纳入教师、学习者和环境因素,以防止预期价值与实践之间出现偏差。本研究探讨了从CBD的设计、实施和调整过程中可以学到什么,以便更好地支持学习者。

方法

这项定性研究从国家、机构和项目层面的实施负责人(N = 18)的角度,探讨了CBD的形成过程。课程编制中对能动性的社会物质取向指导了第一阶段访谈和分析的归纳方法。第二阶段的演绎分析应用了施瓦布的理论,以进一步理解偏差的来源和适应性应对的目的。

结果

在课程编制过程中,教师、学习者和环境的需求最初被低估时,就会出现偏差,使评估实践与教学、学习和委托体验脱节。虽然技术和结构问题对能动性构成了重大限制,但一些实施负责人能够对课程或环境进行调整,以修复脱节问题。我们确定了六项有原则的调整目的,以符合响应式教学、个性化学习和有意义委托的CBME价值观。

结论

总体而言,我们所描述的这些调整体现了建设性对齐,这是CBME的一项基本原则,即评估和教学共同作用以支持学习。本研究提出了一个针对CBME进行情境塑造、基于价值观的调整的模型,以实现其承诺。